Involuntary childlessness: Lessons from interactionist and ecological approaches to disability

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Involuntary childlessness : Lessons from interactionist and ecological approaches to disability. / Lee, Ji-Young.

I: Bioethics, Bind 37, Nr. 5, 2023, s. 462-469.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Lee, J-Y 2023, 'Involuntary childlessness: Lessons from interactionist and ecological approaches to disability', Bioethics, bind 37, nr. 5, s. 462-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13155

APA

Lee, J-Y. (2023). Involuntary childlessness: Lessons from interactionist and ecological approaches to disability. Bioethics, 37(5), 462-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13155

Vancouver

Lee J-Y. Involuntary childlessness: Lessons from interactionist and ecological approaches to disability. Bioethics. 2023;37(5):462-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13155

Author

Lee, Ji-Young. / Involuntary childlessness : Lessons from interactionist and ecological approaches to disability. I: Bioethics. 2023 ; Bind 37, Nr. 5. s. 462-469.

Bibtex

@article{c8b1607f884144c9bff1f545fc4041f9,
title = "Involuntary childlessness: Lessons from interactionist and ecological approaches to disability",
abstract = "Because many involuntarily childless people have equal interests in benefitting from assisted reproductive technologies like in vitro fertilization as a mode of treatment, we have normative reasons to ensure inclusive access to such interventions for as many of these people as is reasonable and possible. However, the prevailing eligibility criterion for access to assisted reproductive technologies-'infertility'-is inadequate to serve the goal of inclusive access. This is because the prevailing frameworks of infertility, which include medical and social infertility, fail to precisely capture and unify the relevance of certain involuntarily childless experiences as warranting assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. I argue that the least we can do for those who have an interest in accessing ARTs is to conceptualize involuntarily childless experiences in dialogue with interactionist and ecological models of disability, to outline a unified and more inclusive eligibility criterion.",
keywords = "assisted reproductive technologies, childlessness, fertility, in vitro fertilization, infertility, reproduction, FERTILITY TREATMENT, INFERTILITY, EXPERIENCES, DISTRESS, SUPPORT, ACCESS, WOMEN, MODEL",
author = "Ji-Young Lee",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1111/bioe.13155",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "462--469",
journal = "Bioethics",
issn = "0269-9702",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Involuntary childlessness

T2 - Lessons from interactionist and ecological approaches to disability

AU - Lee, Ji-Young

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Because many involuntarily childless people have equal interests in benefitting from assisted reproductive technologies like in vitro fertilization as a mode of treatment, we have normative reasons to ensure inclusive access to such interventions for as many of these people as is reasonable and possible. However, the prevailing eligibility criterion for access to assisted reproductive technologies-'infertility'-is inadequate to serve the goal of inclusive access. This is because the prevailing frameworks of infertility, which include medical and social infertility, fail to precisely capture and unify the relevance of certain involuntarily childless experiences as warranting assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. I argue that the least we can do for those who have an interest in accessing ARTs is to conceptualize involuntarily childless experiences in dialogue with interactionist and ecological models of disability, to outline a unified and more inclusive eligibility criterion.

AB - Because many involuntarily childless people have equal interests in benefitting from assisted reproductive technologies like in vitro fertilization as a mode of treatment, we have normative reasons to ensure inclusive access to such interventions for as many of these people as is reasonable and possible. However, the prevailing eligibility criterion for access to assisted reproductive technologies-'infertility'-is inadequate to serve the goal of inclusive access. This is because the prevailing frameworks of infertility, which include medical and social infertility, fail to precisely capture and unify the relevance of certain involuntarily childless experiences as warranting assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. I argue that the least we can do for those who have an interest in accessing ARTs is to conceptualize involuntarily childless experiences in dialogue with interactionist and ecological models of disability, to outline a unified and more inclusive eligibility criterion.

KW - assisted reproductive technologies

KW - childlessness

KW - fertility

KW - in vitro fertilization

KW - infertility

KW - reproduction

KW - FERTILITY TREATMENT

KW - INFERTILITY

KW - EXPERIENCES

KW - DISTRESS

KW - SUPPORT

KW - ACCESS

KW - WOMEN

KW - MODEL

U2 - 10.1111/bioe.13155

DO - 10.1111/bioe.13155

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36916752

VL - 37

SP - 462

EP - 469

JO - Bioethics

JF - Bioethics

SN - 0269-9702

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 342492158