Debriefing Methods for Simulation in Healthcare: A Systematic Review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Debriefing Methods for Simulation in Healthcare : A Systematic Review. / Duff, Jonathan P.; Morse, Kate J.; Seelandt, Julia; Gross, Isabel T.; Lydston, Melis; Sargeant, Joan; Dieckmann, Peter; Allen, Joseph A.; Rudolph, Jenny W.; Kolbe, Michaela.

I: Simulation in Healthcare, Bind 19, Nr. 1, 2024, s. S112-S121.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Duff, JP, Morse, KJ, Seelandt, J, Gross, IT, Lydston, M, Sargeant, J, Dieckmann, P, Allen, JA, Rudolph, JW & Kolbe, M 2024, 'Debriefing Methods for Simulation in Healthcare: A Systematic Review', Simulation in Healthcare, bind 19, nr. 1, s. S112-S121. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000765

APA

Duff, J. P., Morse, K. J., Seelandt, J., Gross, I. T., Lydston, M., Sargeant, J., Dieckmann, P., Allen, J. A., Rudolph, J. W., & Kolbe, M. (2024). Debriefing Methods for Simulation in Healthcare: A Systematic Review. Simulation in Healthcare, 19(1), S112-S121. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000765

Vancouver

Duff JP, Morse KJ, Seelandt J, Gross IT, Lydston M, Sargeant J o.a. Debriefing Methods for Simulation in Healthcare: A Systematic Review. Simulation in Healthcare. 2024;19(1):S112-S121. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000765

Author

Duff, Jonathan P. ; Morse, Kate J. ; Seelandt, Julia ; Gross, Isabel T. ; Lydston, Melis ; Sargeant, Joan ; Dieckmann, Peter ; Allen, Joseph A. ; Rudolph, Jenny W. ; Kolbe, Michaela. / Debriefing Methods for Simulation in Healthcare : A Systematic Review. I: Simulation in Healthcare. 2024 ; Bind 19, Nr. 1. s. S112-S121.

Bibtex

@article{f299a6b7905c407ba6c04dd2ce962de6,
title = "Debriefing Methods for Simulation in Healthcare: A Systematic Review",
abstract = "Debriefing is a critical component in most simulation experiences. With the growing number of debriefing concepts, approaches, and tools, we need to understand how to debrief most effectively because there is little empiric evidence to guide us in their use. This systematic review explores the current literature on debriefing in healthcare simulation education to understand the evidence behind practice and clarify gaps in the literature. The PICO question for this review was defined as {"}In healthcare providers [P], does the use of one debriefing or feedback intervention [I], compared to a different debriefing or feedback intervention [C], improve educational and clinical outcomes [O] in simulation-based education?{"}We included 70 studies in our final review and found that our current debriefing strategies, frameworks, and techniques are not based on robust empirical evidence. Based on this, we highlight future research needs. ",
keywords = "Debriefing, feedback, simulation",
author = "Duff, {Jonathan P.} and Morse, {Kate J.} and Julia Seelandt and Gross, {Isabel T.} and Melis Lydston and Joan Sargeant and Peter Dieckmann and Allen, {Joseph A.} and Rudolph, {Jenny W.} and Michaela Kolbe",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1097/SIH.0000000000000765",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "S112--S121",
journal = "Simulation in Healthcare",
issn = "1559-2332",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Debriefing Methods for Simulation in Healthcare

T2 - A Systematic Review

AU - Duff, Jonathan P.

AU - Morse, Kate J.

AU - Seelandt, Julia

AU - Gross, Isabel T.

AU - Lydston, Melis

AU - Sargeant, Joan

AU - Dieckmann, Peter

AU - Allen, Joseph A.

AU - Rudolph, Jenny W.

AU - Kolbe, Michaela

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Debriefing is a critical component in most simulation experiences. With the growing number of debriefing concepts, approaches, and tools, we need to understand how to debrief most effectively because there is little empiric evidence to guide us in their use. This systematic review explores the current literature on debriefing in healthcare simulation education to understand the evidence behind practice and clarify gaps in the literature. The PICO question for this review was defined as "In healthcare providers [P], does the use of one debriefing or feedback intervention [I], compared to a different debriefing or feedback intervention [C], improve educational and clinical outcomes [O] in simulation-based education?"We included 70 studies in our final review and found that our current debriefing strategies, frameworks, and techniques are not based on robust empirical evidence. Based on this, we highlight future research needs.

AB - Debriefing is a critical component in most simulation experiences. With the growing number of debriefing concepts, approaches, and tools, we need to understand how to debrief most effectively because there is little empiric evidence to guide us in their use. This systematic review explores the current literature on debriefing in healthcare simulation education to understand the evidence behind practice and clarify gaps in the literature. The PICO question for this review was defined as "In healthcare providers [P], does the use of one debriefing or feedback intervention [I], compared to a different debriefing or feedback intervention [C], improve educational and clinical outcomes [O] in simulation-based education?"We included 70 studies in our final review and found that our current debriefing strategies, frameworks, and techniques are not based on robust empirical evidence. Based on this, we highlight future research needs.

KW - Debriefing

KW - feedback

KW - simulation

U2 - 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000765

DO - 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000765

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38240623

AN - SCOPUS:85182807633

VL - 19

SP - S112-S121

JO - Simulation in Healthcare

JF - Simulation in Healthcare

SN - 1559-2332

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 381555676