Symptom Perceptions in Functional Disorders, Major Health Conditions, and Healthy Controls: A General Population Study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 443 KB, PDF-dokument

  • Angelika Weigel
  • Thomas Meinertz Dantoft
  • Torben Jørgensen
  • Tina Carstensen
  • Bernd Löwe
  • John Weinman
  • Lisbeth Frostholm
Background: The present study investigated differences in symptom perceptions between individuals with functional disorders (FD), major health conditions, and FDs + major health conditions, respectively, and a group of healthy individuals. Furthermore, it investigated the relevance of FDs among other health-related and psychological correlates of symptom perceptions in the framework of the Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CMS). Method: This cross-sectional study used epidemiological data from the Danish Study of Functional Disorders part two (N = 7,459 participants, 54% female, 51.99 ± 13.4 years). Symptom perceptions were assessed using the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) and compared between the four health condition groups. Multiple regression analyses were performed to examine associations between symptom perceptions, FDs, and other health-related and psychological correlates from the CMS framework. Results: Individuals with FDs (n = 976) and those with FDs + major health conditions (n = 162) reported less favorable symptom perceptions compared to the other two groups, particularly regarding perceived consequences, timeline, and emotional representations (effect size range Cohen’s d = 0.12-0.66). The presence of a FD was significantly associated with all B-IPQ items, even in the context of 16 other relevant health-related and psychological correlates from the CMS framework, whereas symptom presence last year or last week was not. Conclusion: In the general population, symptom perceptions seem to play a more salient role in FD than in individuals with well-defined physical illness. Symptom perceptions should therefore be targeted in both primary and secondary interventions for FDs.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummere7739
TidsskriftClinical Psychology in Europe
Vol/bind4
Udgave nummer4
Antal sider23
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
This study was a part of the DanFunD study funded by TrygFonden (grant number 7-11-0213), the Lundbeck Foundation (grant number R155-2013-14070) and the Center for Clinical Research and Prevention. The DanFunD scientific management group consists of Professor, DMSci Torben Jørgensen (PI); Professor, DMSci Per Fink; senior consultant, PhD Lene Falgaard Eplov; MSc, PhD Susanne Brix Pedersen; MD, PhD Michael Benros; MSc, PhD Betina Heignsbæk Thuesen, and DanFunD scientific officer MSc, PhD Thomas M Dantoft. The University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf supported this study by funding a three-month research visit in 2018 for Angelika Weigel.

Funding Information:
Funding: This study was a part of the DanFunD study funded by TrygFonden (grant number 7-11-0213), the Lundbeck Foundation (grant number R155-2013-14070) and the Center for Clinical Research and Prevention. The DanFunD management group consists of Professor, DMSci Torben Jørgensen (PI); Professor, DMSci Per Fink; senior consultant, PhD Lene Falgaard Eplov; MSc, PhD Susanne Brix Pedersen; MD, PhD Michael Benros; MSc, PhD Betina Heignsbæk Thuesen, and DanFunD MSc, PhD Thomas M Dantoft. The University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf supported this study by funding a three-month research visit in 2018 for Angelika Weigel.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s).

ID: 343133974