Screening for cognitive impairment among patients with work-related stress complaints in Denmark: validation and evaluation of objective and self-report tools

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Screening for cognitive impairment among patients with work-related stress complaints in Denmark : validation and evaluation of objective and self-report tools. / Jensen, Johan Høy; Miskowiak, Kamilla Woznica; Purdon, Scot E.; Thomsen, Jane Frølund; Eller, Nanna Hurwitz.

I: Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, Bind 48, Nr. 1, 2022, s. 71-80.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jensen, JH, Miskowiak, KW, Purdon, SE, Thomsen, JF & Eller, NH 2022, 'Screening for cognitive impairment among patients with work-related stress complaints in Denmark: validation and evaluation of objective and self-report tools', Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, bind 48, nr. 1, s. 71-80. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3990

APA

Jensen, J. H., Miskowiak, K. W., Purdon, S. E., Thomsen, J. F., & Eller, N. H. (2022). Screening for cognitive impairment among patients with work-related stress complaints in Denmark: validation and evaluation of objective and self-report tools. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 48(1), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3990

Vancouver

Jensen JH, Miskowiak KW, Purdon SE, Thomsen JF, Eller NH. Screening for cognitive impairment among patients with work-related stress complaints in Denmark: validation and evaluation of objective and self-report tools. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 2022;48(1):71-80. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3990

Author

Jensen, Johan Høy ; Miskowiak, Kamilla Woznica ; Purdon, Scot E. ; Thomsen, Jane Frølund ; Eller, Nanna Hurwitz. / Screening for cognitive impairment among patients with work-related stress complaints in Denmark : validation and evaluation of objective and self-report tools. I: Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 2022 ; Bind 48, Nr. 1. s. 71-80.

Bibtex

@article{c594695188dc43b88912b35aec9f5dc3,
title = "Screening for cognitive impairment among patients with work-related stress complaints in Denmark: validation and evaluation of objective and self-report tools",
abstract = "Objective Many patients with work-related stress display cognitive impairment that may hamper recovery. We examined objective and subjective tools for screening of cognitive impairment in this patient group. Methods Patients were assessed with Danish versions of the objective Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP-D), standardized neuropsychological tests that tapped into the same cognitive domains, the self-assessed Cognitive Failure Questionnaire (CFQ), and several additional scales of symptom severity and psychosocial status. Concurrent validity of the SCIP-D and CFQ was assessed by calculation of Pearson{\textquoteright}s correlation coefficients between the objective and subjective tools and the scores on more conventional standardized neuropsychological tests. Decision validity was assessed with logistic receiver-operating-characteristic analyses using a cut-score approach to the objective and the subjective test results to predict impairment detected by the standardized tests. Cognitive norms were established through the data of 79 healthy controls. SCIP-D scores were compared between patients and healthy controls with independent t-tests. Results We included 82 patients with work-related stress. The SCIP-D total scores were strongly associated with standardized neuropsychological tests (r=0.76, P<0.001). The self-assessed CFQ was not associated with either measure of objective cognitive functioning (r≤0.12, P≥0.30). The optimal SCIP-D total-score cut of ≤72 identified 43.2% of the patients with global objective cognitive impairment. The patients performed mildly-to. moderately lower than the healthy controls on the SCIP-D total score (Cohen{\textquoteright}s d=0.39) and the subtests for working memory (d=0.39) and processing speed (d=0.61). Conclusion The SCIP-D is a valid screening tool sensitive to objective performance-based cognitive impairment among patients with work-related stress.",
keywords = "assessment, attention, burnout, exhaustion disorder, memory, neuropsychological test, SCIP, selfrated health, working memory",
author = "Jensen, {Johan H{\o}y} and Miskowiak, {Kamilla Woznica} and Purdon, {Scot E.} and Thomsen, {Jane Fr{\o}lund} and Eller, {Nanna Hurwitz}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.5271/sjweh.3990",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "71--80",
journal = "Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health",
issn = "0355-3140",
publisher = "Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Screening for cognitive impairment among patients with work-related stress complaints in Denmark

T2 - validation and evaluation of objective and self-report tools

AU - Jensen, Johan Høy

AU - Miskowiak, Kamilla Woznica

AU - Purdon, Scot E.

AU - Thomsen, Jane Frølund

AU - Eller, Nanna Hurwitz

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022, Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Objective Many patients with work-related stress display cognitive impairment that may hamper recovery. We examined objective and subjective tools for screening of cognitive impairment in this patient group. Methods Patients were assessed with Danish versions of the objective Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP-D), standardized neuropsychological tests that tapped into the same cognitive domains, the self-assessed Cognitive Failure Questionnaire (CFQ), and several additional scales of symptom severity and psychosocial status. Concurrent validity of the SCIP-D and CFQ was assessed by calculation of Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the objective and subjective tools and the scores on more conventional standardized neuropsychological tests. Decision validity was assessed with logistic receiver-operating-characteristic analyses using a cut-score approach to the objective and the subjective test results to predict impairment detected by the standardized tests. Cognitive norms were established through the data of 79 healthy controls. SCIP-D scores were compared between patients and healthy controls with independent t-tests. Results We included 82 patients with work-related stress. The SCIP-D total scores were strongly associated with standardized neuropsychological tests (r=0.76, P<0.001). The self-assessed CFQ was not associated with either measure of objective cognitive functioning (r≤0.12, P≥0.30). The optimal SCIP-D total-score cut of ≤72 identified 43.2% of the patients with global objective cognitive impairment. The patients performed mildly-to. moderately lower than the healthy controls on the SCIP-D total score (Cohen’s d=0.39) and the subtests for working memory (d=0.39) and processing speed (d=0.61). Conclusion The SCIP-D is a valid screening tool sensitive to objective performance-based cognitive impairment among patients with work-related stress.

AB - Objective Many patients with work-related stress display cognitive impairment that may hamper recovery. We examined objective and subjective tools for screening of cognitive impairment in this patient group. Methods Patients were assessed with Danish versions of the objective Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP-D), standardized neuropsychological tests that tapped into the same cognitive domains, the self-assessed Cognitive Failure Questionnaire (CFQ), and several additional scales of symptom severity and psychosocial status. Concurrent validity of the SCIP-D and CFQ was assessed by calculation of Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the objective and subjective tools and the scores on more conventional standardized neuropsychological tests. Decision validity was assessed with logistic receiver-operating-characteristic analyses using a cut-score approach to the objective and the subjective test results to predict impairment detected by the standardized tests. Cognitive norms were established through the data of 79 healthy controls. SCIP-D scores were compared between patients and healthy controls with independent t-tests. Results We included 82 patients with work-related stress. The SCIP-D total scores were strongly associated with standardized neuropsychological tests (r=0.76, P<0.001). The self-assessed CFQ was not associated with either measure of objective cognitive functioning (r≤0.12, P≥0.30). The optimal SCIP-D total-score cut of ≤72 identified 43.2% of the patients with global objective cognitive impairment. The patients performed mildly-to. moderately lower than the healthy controls on the SCIP-D total score (Cohen’s d=0.39) and the subtests for working memory (d=0.39) and processing speed (d=0.61). Conclusion The SCIP-D is a valid screening tool sensitive to objective performance-based cognitive impairment among patients with work-related stress.

KW - assessment

KW - attention

KW - burnout

KW - exhaustion disorder

KW - memory

KW - neuropsychological test

KW - SCIP

KW - selfrated health

KW - working memory

U2 - 10.5271/sjweh.3990

DO - 10.5271/sjweh.3990

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34580738

AN - SCOPUS:85123227803

VL - 48

SP - 71

EP - 80

JO - Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health

JF - Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health

SN - 0355-3140

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 344977384