Conceptualizing negotiation in the clinical encounter – A scoping review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Conceptualizing negotiation in the clinical encounter – A scoping review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis. / Nilou, Freja Ekstrøm; Christoffersen, Nanna Bjørnbak; Lian, Olaug S.; Guassora, Ann Dorrit; Broholm-Jørgensen, Marie.
I: Patient Education and Counseling, Bind 121, 108134, 2024.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Conceptualizing negotiation in the clinical encounter – A scoping review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis
AU - Nilou, Freja Ekstrøm
AU - Christoffersen, Nanna Bjørnbak
AU - Lian, Olaug S.
AU - Guassora, Ann Dorrit
AU - Broholm-Jørgensen, Marie
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Objective: Negotiation as an analytical concept in research about clinical encounters is vague. We aim to provide a conceptual synthesis of key characteristics of the process of negotiation in clinical encounters based on a scoping review. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of relevant literature in Embase, Psych Info, Global Health and SCOPUS. We included 25 studies from 1737 citations reviewed. Results: We found that the process of negotiation is socially situated depending on the individual patient and professional, a dynamic element of the interaction that may occur both tacitly and explicitly at all stages of the encounter and is not necessarily tied to a specific health problem. Hence, negotiation is complex and influenced by both social, biomedical, and temporal contexts. Conclusions: We found that negotiation between patient and health professional occurs at all stages of the clinical encounter. Negotiation is influenced by social, temporal, and biomedical contexts that encompass the social meeting between patient and health professional. We suggest that health professionals strive to be attentive to patients’ tacit negotiation practices. This will strengthen the recognition of the patients’ actual wishes for their course of treatment which can thus guide the health professionals’ recommendations and treatment.
AB - Objective: Negotiation as an analytical concept in research about clinical encounters is vague. We aim to provide a conceptual synthesis of key characteristics of the process of negotiation in clinical encounters based on a scoping review. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of relevant literature in Embase, Psych Info, Global Health and SCOPUS. We included 25 studies from 1737 citations reviewed. Results: We found that the process of negotiation is socially situated depending on the individual patient and professional, a dynamic element of the interaction that may occur both tacitly and explicitly at all stages of the encounter and is not necessarily tied to a specific health problem. Hence, negotiation is complex and influenced by both social, biomedical, and temporal contexts. Conclusions: We found that negotiation between patient and health professional occurs at all stages of the clinical encounter. Negotiation is influenced by social, temporal, and biomedical contexts that encompass the social meeting between patient and health professional. We suggest that health professionals strive to be attentive to patients’ tacit negotiation practices. This will strengthen the recognition of the patients’ actual wishes for their course of treatment which can thus guide the health professionals’ recommendations and treatment.
KW - Clinical Encounter
KW - Negotiation
KW - Patient-Professional Interaction
KW - Scoping Review
U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108134
DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108134
M3 - Review
C2 - 38199175
AN - SCOPUS:85182029200
VL - 121
JO - Patient Education and Counseling
JF - Patient Education and Counseling
SN - 0738-3991
M1 - 108134
ER -
ID: 384337813