Cities Changing Diabetes: Rule of Halves analysis for Copenhagen

Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapportRapportForskning

Standard

Cities Changing Diabetes : Rule of Halves analysis for Copenhagen. / Holm, Astrid Ledgaard; Andersen, Gregers Stig; Jørgensen, Marit Eika; Diderichsen, Finn.

København : Københavns Universitet, 2016. 52 s.

Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapportRapportForskning

Harvard

Holm, AL, Andersen, GS, Jørgensen, ME & Diderichsen, F 2016, Cities Changing Diabetes: Rule of Halves analysis for Copenhagen. Københavns Universitet, København.

APA

Holm, A. L., Andersen, G. S., Jørgensen, M. E., & Diderichsen, F. (2016). Cities Changing Diabetes: Rule of Halves analysis for Copenhagen. Københavns Universitet.

Vancouver

Holm AL, Andersen GS, Jørgensen ME, Diderichsen F. Cities Changing Diabetes: Rule of Halves analysis for Copenhagen. København: Københavns Universitet, 2016. 52 s.

Author

Holm, Astrid Ledgaard ; Andersen, Gregers Stig ; Jørgensen, Marit Eika ; Diderichsen, Finn. / Cities Changing Diabetes : Rule of Halves analysis for Copenhagen. København : Københavns Universitet, 2016. 52 s.

Bibtex

@book{b89d6a6647fe4da1a0840d31fe886640,
title = "Cities Changing Diabetes: Rule of Halves analysis for Copenhagen",
abstract = "The Rule of Halves (RoH), stating that half of those with diabetes are diagnosed, half of those diagnosed receive care, half of those receiving care achieve treatment targets, and finally that half of those achieving targets also achieve desired outcomes, has not previously been assessed for diabetes in Copenhagen. As part of the quantitative mapping phase of the Cities Changing Diabetes project in Copenhagen, a RoH analysis was conducted. The results of this analysis are summarized below.The figure shows that the {\textquoteleft}Halves{\textquoteright} rule does not generally apply for Copenhagen. On most of the levels, Copenhagen is doing better than simple halves. For example, the results indicate that almost three quarters of the true diabetes population are diagnosed and that almost all of those diagnosed with diabetes receive some form of care.Although the analysis indicates that Copenhagen is doing better than the Rule of Halves when it comes to diabetes, there is still room for improvement. One out of four of those with diabetes have not been diagnosed, and although 98% receive some form of care, that does not necessarily reflect appropriate and timely care; our results show that the proportion ofpatients receiving screening for complications and clinical assessment according to national guidelines is ranging between 85% and 95%. Furthermore, the proportion achieving treatment targets is only around 40-60%, and only 60% of the diabetes population is achieving the desired outcomes in terms of no prevalent experiences of complications. Further, the RoH analysis showed that there are major socioeconomic differences in the prevalence of risk factors and occurrence of diabetes. Especially individuals with a low education, those without employment (i.e. unemployed or retired), of older age and non-western background has higher risk. However, the results also indicate that people with a short education and no employment more often had received information regarding preventive services and accepted offers of such services.",
author = "Holm, {Astrid Ledgaard} and Andersen, {Gregers Stig} and J{\o}rgensen, {Marit Eika} and Finn Diderichsen",
year = "2016",
language = "Dansk",
publisher = "K{\o}benhavns Universitet",

}

RIS

TY - RPRT

T1 - Cities Changing Diabetes

T2 - Rule of Halves analysis for Copenhagen

AU - Holm, Astrid Ledgaard

AU - Andersen, Gregers Stig

AU - Jørgensen, Marit Eika

AU - Diderichsen, Finn

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The Rule of Halves (RoH), stating that half of those with diabetes are diagnosed, half of those diagnosed receive care, half of those receiving care achieve treatment targets, and finally that half of those achieving targets also achieve desired outcomes, has not previously been assessed for diabetes in Copenhagen. As part of the quantitative mapping phase of the Cities Changing Diabetes project in Copenhagen, a RoH analysis was conducted. The results of this analysis are summarized below.The figure shows that the ‘Halves’ rule does not generally apply for Copenhagen. On most of the levels, Copenhagen is doing better than simple halves. For example, the results indicate that almost three quarters of the true diabetes population are diagnosed and that almost all of those diagnosed with diabetes receive some form of care.Although the analysis indicates that Copenhagen is doing better than the Rule of Halves when it comes to diabetes, there is still room for improvement. One out of four of those with diabetes have not been diagnosed, and although 98% receive some form of care, that does not necessarily reflect appropriate and timely care; our results show that the proportion ofpatients receiving screening for complications and clinical assessment according to national guidelines is ranging between 85% and 95%. Furthermore, the proportion achieving treatment targets is only around 40-60%, and only 60% of the diabetes population is achieving the desired outcomes in terms of no prevalent experiences of complications. Further, the RoH analysis showed that there are major socioeconomic differences in the prevalence of risk factors and occurrence of diabetes. Especially individuals with a low education, those without employment (i.e. unemployed or retired), of older age and non-western background has higher risk. However, the results also indicate that people with a short education and no employment more often had received information regarding preventive services and accepted offers of such services.

AB - The Rule of Halves (RoH), stating that half of those with diabetes are diagnosed, half of those diagnosed receive care, half of those receiving care achieve treatment targets, and finally that half of those achieving targets also achieve desired outcomes, has not previously been assessed for diabetes in Copenhagen. As part of the quantitative mapping phase of the Cities Changing Diabetes project in Copenhagen, a RoH analysis was conducted. The results of this analysis are summarized below.The figure shows that the ‘Halves’ rule does not generally apply for Copenhagen. On most of the levels, Copenhagen is doing better than simple halves. For example, the results indicate that almost three quarters of the true diabetes population are diagnosed and that almost all of those diagnosed with diabetes receive some form of care.Although the analysis indicates that Copenhagen is doing better than the Rule of Halves when it comes to diabetes, there is still room for improvement. One out of four of those with diabetes have not been diagnosed, and although 98% receive some form of care, that does not necessarily reflect appropriate and timely care; our results show that the proportion ofpatients receiving screening for complications and clinical assessment according to national guidelines is ranging between 85% and 95%. Furthermore, the proportion achieving treatment targets is only around 40-60%, and only 60% of the diabetes population is achieving the desired outcomes in terms of no prevalent experiences of complications. Further, the RoH analysis showed that there are major socioeconomic differences in the prevalence of risk factors and occurrence of diabetes. Especially individuals with a low education, those without employment (i.e. unemployed or retired), of older age and non-western background has higher risk. However, the results also indicate that people with a short education and no employment more often had received information regarding preventive services and accepted offers of such services.

M3 - Rapport

BT - Cities Changing Diabetes

PB - Københavns Universitet

CY - København

ER -

ID: 165655451