Implementation of systematic screening for anxiety and depression in cardiac rehabilitation: Real world lessons from a longitudinal study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Implementation of systematic screening for anxiety and depression in cardiac rehabilitation : Real world lessons from a longitudinal study. / Egholm, Cecilie Lindström; Helmark, Charlotte; Rossau, Henriette Knold; Munkehøj, Pia; Brøndum, Stig; Pedersen, Susanne S.; Zwisler, Ann Dorthe.

I: Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Bind 158, 110909, 2022.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Egholm, CL, Helmark, C, Rossau, HK, Munkehøj, P, Brøndum, S, Pedersen, SS & Zwisler, AD 2022, 'Implementation of systematic screening for anxiety and depression in cardiac rehabilitation: Real world lessons from a longitudinal study', Journal of Psychosomatic Research, bind 158, 110909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110909

APA

Egholm, C. L., Helmark, C., Rossau, H. K., Munkehøj, P., Brøndum, S., Pedersen, S. S., & Zwisler, A. D. (2022). Implementation of systematic screening for anxiety and depression in cardiac rehabilitation: Real world lessons from a longitudinal study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 158, [110909]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110909

Vancouver

Egholm CL, Helmark C, Rossau HK, Munkehøj P, Brøndum S, Pedersen SS o.a. Implementation of systematic screening for anxiety and depression in cardiac rehabilitation: Real world lessons from a longitudinal study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2022;158. 110909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110909

Author

Egholm, Cecilie Lindström ; Helmark, Charlotte ; Rossau, Henriette Knold ; Munkehøj, Pia ; Brøndum, Stig ; Pedersen, Susanne S. ; Zwisler, Ann Dorthe. / Implementation of systematic screening for anxiety and depression in cardiac rehabilitation : Real world lessons from a longitudinal study. I: Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2022 ; Bind 158.

Bibtex

@article{11a948666c68405aba294ccf48663137,
title = "Implementation of systematic screening for anxiety and depression in cardiac rehabilitation: Real world lessons from a longitudinal study",
abstract = "Aims: Systematic screening for anxiety and depression is widely recommended as a core component of cardiac rehabilitation in ischemic heart disease, however, recommendation-practice gaps are common and limited knowledge exists about factors hindering and supporting implementation. The study aimed to assess adherence to national clinical guideline recommendations and to gain a greater understanding of the implementation of screening in real-world practice. Methods: An observational, longitudinal mixed-methods design including hospitals and municipalities in Denmark. We retrieved nationwide survey data from 2013, 2015, 2018 and 2021 to assess adherence to screening on programme level, and clinical quality registry data from 2016 to 2020 to assess proportion of patients screened. Data were analysed descriptively. Semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals were conducted in 2015 (n = 11) and 2020 (n = 11) to explore how screening was conducted and factors supporting implementation. Normalization Process Theory guided interviews and content analysis. Results: Screening on programme level increased from 61% to 88% in hospitals and 20% to 89% in municipalities. The individual proportion of patients screened remained relatively stable in both hospitals and municipalities overall, however with considerable inter-site differences. Screening practices became more aligned to guidelines, pushed by formal recommendations and monitoring, and pulled by activities strengthening the knowledge and motivation among staff. Conclusion: Screening for anxiety and depression improved considerably over the seven-year period, from a scattered practice driven by individuals to a movement where healthcare professionals had a feeling of going with the flow. Nationwide implementation of screening requires national and local supporting activities and a continuous effort.",
keywords = "Anxiety, Cardiac rehabilitation, Delivery of health care, Depression, Implementation, Quality improvement, Screening",
author = "Egholm, {Cecilie Lindstr{\"o}m} and Charlotte Helmark and Rossau, {Henriette Knold} and Pia Munkeh{\o}j and Stig Br{\o}ndum and Pedersen, {Susanne S.} and Zwisler, {Ann Dorthe}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110909",
language = "English",
volume = "158",
journal = "Journal of Psychosomatic Research",
issn = "0022-3999",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation of systematic screening for anxiety and depression in cardiac rehabilitation

T2 - Real world lessons from a longitudinal study

AU - Egholm, Cecilie Lindström

AU - Helmark, Charlotte

AU - Rossau, Henriette Knold

AU - Munkehøj, Pia

AU - Brøndum, Stig

AU - Pedersen, Susanne S.

AU - Zwisler, Ann Dorthe

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Aims: Systematic screening for anxiety and depression is widely recommended as a core component of cardiac rehabilitation in ischemic heart disease, however, recommendation-practice gaps are common and limited knowledge exists about factors hindering and supporting implementation. The study aimed to assess adherence to national clinical guideline recommendations and to gain a greater understanding of the implementation of screening in real-world practice. Methods: An observational, longitudinal mixed-methods design including hospitals and municipalities in Denmark. We retrieved nationwide survey data from 2013, 2015, 2018 and 2021 to assess adherence to screening on programme level, and clinical quality registry data from 2016 to 2020 to assess proportion of patients screened. Data were analysed descriptively. Semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals were conducted in 2015 (n = 11) and 2020 (n = 11) to explore how screening was conducted and factors supporting implementation. Normalization Process Theory guided interviews and content analysis. Results: Screening on programme level increased from 61% to 88% in hospitals and 20% to 89% in municipalities. The individual proportion of patients screened remained relatively stable in both hospitals and municipalities overall, however with considerable inter-site differences. Screening practices became more aligned to guidelines, pushed by formal recommendations and monitoring, and pulled by activities strengthening the knowledge and motivation among staff. Conclusion: Screening for anxiety and depression improved considerably over the seven-year period, from a scattered practice driven by individuals to a movement where healthcare professionals had a feeling of going with the flow. Nationwide implementation of screening requires national and local supporting activities and a continuous effort.

AB - Aims: Systematic screening for anxiety and depression is widely recommended as a core component of cardiac rehabilitation in ischemic heart disease, however, recommendation-practice gaps are common and limited knowledge exists about factors hindering and supporting implementation. The study aimed to assess adherence to national clinical guideline recommendations and to gain a greater understanding of the implementation of screening in real-world practice. Methods: An observational, longitudinal mixed-methods design including hospitals and municipalities in Denmark. We retrieved nationwide survey data from 2013, 2015, 2018 and 2021 to assess adherence to screening on programme level, and clinical quality registry data from 2016 to 2020 to assess proportion of patients screened. Data were analysed descriptively. Semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals were conducted in 2015 (n = 11) and 2020 (n = 11) to explore how screening was conducted and factors supporting implementation. Normalization Process Theory guided interviews and content analysis. Results: Screening on programme level increased from 61% to 88% in hospitals and 20% to 89% in municipalities. The individual proportion of patients screened remained relatively stable in both hospitals and municipalities overall, however with considerable inter-site differences. Screening practices became more aligned to guidelines, pushed by formal recommendations and monitoring, and pulled by activities strengthening the knowledge and motivation among staff. Conclusion: Screening for anxiety and depression improved considerably over the seven-year period, from a scattered practice driven by individuals to a movement where healthcare professionals had a feeling of going with the flow. Nationwide implementation of screening requires national and local supporting activities and a continuous effort.

KW - Anxiety

KW - Cardiac rehabilitation

KW - Delivery of health care

KW - Depression

KW - Implementation

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Screening

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110909

DO - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110909

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35472687

AN - SCOPUS:85129116509

VL - 158

JO - Journal of Psychosomatic Research

JF - Journal of Psychosomatic Research

SN - 0022-3999

M1 - 110909

ER -

ID: 342933742