Occupational risk of COVID-19 in foreign-born employees in Denmark

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Occupational risk of COVID-19 in foreign-born employees in Denmark. / Bonde, J. P. E.; Begtrup, L. M.; Jensen, J. H.; Flachs, E. M.; Jakobsson, K.; Nielsen, C.; Nilsson, K.; Rylander, L.; Vilhelmsson, A.; Petersen, K. U.; Tottenborg, S. S.

I: Occupational Medicine, Bind 74, Nr. 1, 2024, s. 63-70.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Bonde, JPE, Begtrup, LM, Jensen, JH, Flachs, EM, Jakobsson, K, Nielsen, C, Nilsson, K, Rylander, L, Vilhelmsson, A, Petersen, KU & Tottenborg, SS 2024, 'Occupational risk of COVID-19 in foreign-born employees in Denmark', Occupational Medicine, bind 74, nr. 1, s. 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqad044

APA

Bonde, J. P. E., Begtrup, L. M., Jensen, J. H., Flachs, E. M., Jakobsson, K., Nielsen, C., Nilsson, K., Rylander, L., Vilhelmsson, A., Petersen, K. U., & Tottenborg, S. S. (2024). Occupational risk of COVID-19 in foreign-born employees in Denmark. Occupational Medicine, 74(1), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqad044

Vancouver

Bonde JPE, Begtrup LM, Jensen JH, Flachs EM, Jakobsson K, Nielsen C o.a. Occupational risk of COVID-19 in foreign-born employees in Denmark. Occupational Medicine. 2024;74(1):63-70. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqad044

Author

Bonde, J. P. E. ; Begtrup, L. M. ; Jensen, J. H. ; Flachs, E. M. ; Jakobsson, K. ; Nielsen, C. ; Nilsson, K. ; Rylander, L. ; Vilhelmsson, A. ; Petersen, K. U. ; Tottenborg, S. S. / Occupational risk of COVID-19 in foreign-born employees in Denmark. I: Occupational Medicine. 2024 ; Bind 74, Nr. 1. s. 63-70.

Bibtex

@article{d826e05551b748528998401e909c09b4,
title = "Occupational risk of COVID-19 in foreign-born employees in Denmark",
abstract = "Background Foreign-born workers in high-income countries experience higher rates of COVID-19 but the causes are only partially known. Aims To examine if the occupational risk of COVID-19 in foreign-born workers deviates from the risk in native-born employees in Denmark. Methods Within a registry-based cohort of all residents employed in Denmark (n = 2 451 542), we identified four-digit DISCO-08 occupations associated with an increased incidence of COVID-19-related hospital admission during 2020-21 (at-risk occupations). The sex-specific prevalence of at-risk employment in foreign born was compared with the prevalence in native born. Moreover, we examined if the country of birth modified the risk of a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test and COVID-19-related hospital admission in at-risk occupations. Results Workers born in low-income countries and male workers from Eastern Europe more often worked in at-risk occupations (relative risks between 1.16 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.14-1.17] and 1.87 [95% CI 1.82-1.90]). Being foreign-born modified the adjusted risk of PCR test positivity (test for interaction P < 0.0001), primarily because of higher risk in at-risk occupations among men born in Eastern European countries (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 2.39 [95% CI 2.09-2.72] versus IRR 1.19 [95% CI 1.14-1.23] in native-born men). For COVID-19-related hospital admission, no overall interaction was seen, and in women, country of birth did not consistently modify the occupational risk. Conclusions Workplace viral transmission may contribute to an excess risk of COVID-19 in male workers born in Eastern Europe, but most foreign-born employees in at-risk occupations seem not to be at higher occupational risk than native born.In Western countries, foreign-born people from low-income countries experience up to 5-fold higher risk of COVID-19 than native born. While cultural and socio-economic factors explain part of the increased risk, little is known about occupational factors. This study examines if foreign-born people in Denmark more often are working in occupations with known increased risk of COVID-19 and if foreign-born people working in these at-risk occupations are at higher risk than native born in the same occupations.",
keywords = "SARS-COV-2 INFECTION, CARE",
author = "Bonde, {J. P. E.} and Begtrup, {L. M.} and Jensen, {J. H.} and Flachs, {E. M.} and K. Jakobsson and C. Nielsen and K. Nilsson and L. Rylander and A. Vilhelmsson and Petersen, {K. U.} and Tottenborg, {S. S.}",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1093/occmed/kqad044",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "63--70",
journal = "Occupational Medicine",
issn = "0962-7480",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Occupational risk of COVID-19 in foreign-born employees in Denmark

AU - Bonde, J. P. E.

AU - Begtrup, L. M.

AU - Jensen, J. H.

AU - Flachs, E. M.

AU - Jakobsson, K.

AU - Nielsen, C.

AU - Nilsson, K.

AU - Rylander, L.

AU - Vilhelmsson, A.

AU - Petersen, K. U.

AU - Tottenborg, S. S.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Background Foreign-born workers in high-income countries experience higher rates of COVID-19 but the causes are only partially known. Aims To examine if the occupational risk of COVID-19 in foreign-born workers deviates from the risk in native-born employees in Denmark. Methods Within a registry-based cohort of all residents employed in Denmark (n = 2 451 542), we identified four-digit DISCO-08 occupations associated with an increased incidence of COVID-19-related hospital admission during 2020-21 (at-risk occupations). The sex-specific prevalence of at-risk employment in foreign born was compared with the prevalence in native born. Moreover, we examined if the country of birth modified the risk of a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test and COVID-19-related hospital admission in at-risk occupations. Results Workers born in low-income countries and male workers from Eastern Europe more often worked in at-risk occupations (relative risks between 1.16 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.14-1.17] and 1.87 [95% CI 1.82-1.90]). Being foreign-born modified the adjusted risk of PCR test positivity (test for interaction P < 0.0001), primarily because of higher risk in at-risk occupations among men born in Eastern European countries (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 2.39 [95% CI 2.09-2.72] versus IRR 1.19 [95% CI 1.14-1.23] in native-born men). For COVID-19-related hospital admission, no overall interaction was seen, and in women, country of birth did not consistently modify the occupational risk. Conclusions Workplace viral transmission may contribute to an excess risk of COVID-19 in male workers born in Eastern Europe, but most foreign-born employees in at-risk occupations seem not to be at higher occupational risk than native born.In Western countries, foreign-born people from low-income countries experience up to 5-fold higher risk of COVID-19 than native born. While cultural and socio-economic factors explain part of the increased risk, little is known about occupational factors. This study examines if foreign-born people in Denmark more often are working in occupations with known increased risk of COVID-19 and if foreign-born people working in these at-risk occupations are at higher risk than native born in the same occupations.

AB - Background Foreign-born workers in high-income countries experience higher rates of COVID-19 but the causes are only partially known. Aims To examine if the occupational risk of COVID-19 in foreign-born workers deviates from the risk in native-born employees in Denmark. Methods Within a registry-based cohort of all residents employed in Denmark (n = 2 451 542), we identified four-digit DISCO-08 occupations associated with an increased incidence of COVID-19-related hospital admission during 2020-21 (at-risk occupations). The sex-specific prevalence of at-risk employment in foreign born was compared with the prevalence in native born. Moreover, we examined if the country of birth modified the risk of a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test and COVID-19-related hospital admission in at-risk occupations. Results Workers born in low-income countries and male workers from Eastern Europe more often worked in at-risk occupations (relative risks between 1.16 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.14-1.17] and 1.87 [95% CI 1.82-1.90]). Being foreign-born modified the adjusted risk of PCR test positivity (test for interaction P < 0.0001), primarily because of higher risk in at-risk occupations among men born in Eastern European countries (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 2.39 [95% CI 2.09-2.72] versus IRR 1.19 [95% CI 1.14-1.23] in native-born men). For COVID-19-related hospital admission, no overall interaction was seen, and in women, country of birth did not consistently modify the occupational risk. Conclusions Workplace viral transmission may contribute to an excess risk of COVID-19 in male workers born in Eastern Europe, but most foreign-born employees in at-risk occupations seem not to be at higher occupational risk than native born.In Western countries, foreign-born people from low-income countries experience up to 5-fold higher risk of COVID-19 than native born. While cultural and socio-economic factors explain part of the increased risk, little is known about occupational factors. This study examines if foreign-born people in Denmark more often are working in occupations with known increased risk of COVID-19 and if foreign-born people working in these at-risk occupations are at higher risk than native born in the same occupations.

KW - SARS-COV-2 INFECTION

KW - CARE

U2 - 10.1093/occmed/kqad044

DO - 10.1093/occmed/kqad044

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37133767

VL - 74

SP - 63

EP - 70

JO - Occupational Medicine

JF - Occupational Medicine

SN - 0962-7480

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 346450202