Quality clusters in general practice: associations between cluster organization and general practitioners' self-reported benefits

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Quality clusters in general practice : associations between cluster organization and general practitioners' self-reported benefits. / Bundgaard, Maria; Jarbol, Dorte Ejg; Søndergaard, Jens; Kousgaard, Marius Brostrom; Wehberg, Sonja; Pedersen, Line Bjornskov.

I: Family Practice, Bind 39, Nr. 5, 2022, s. 852–859.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Bundgaard, M, Jarbol, DE, Søndergaard, J, Kousgaard, MB, Wehberg, S & Pedersen, LB 2022, 'Quality clusters in general practice: associations between cluster organization and general practitioners' self-reported benefits', Family Practice, bind 39, nr. 5, s. 852–859. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmac011

APA

Bundgaard, M., Jarbol, D. E., Søndergaard, J., Kousgaard, M. B., Wehberg, S., & Pedersen, L. B. (2022). Quality clusters in general practice: associations between cluster organization and general practitioners' self-reported benefits. Family Practice, 39(5), 852–859. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmac011

Vancouver

Bundgaard M, Jarbol DE, Søndergaard J, Kousgaard MB, Wehberg S, Pedersen LB. Quality clusters in general practice: associations between cluster organization and general practitioners' self-reported benefits. Family Practice. 2022;39(5):852–859. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmac011

Author

Bundgaard, Maria ; Jarbol, Dorte Ejg ; Søndergaard, Jens ; Kousgaard, Marius Brostrom ; Wehberg, Sonja ; Pedersen, Line Bjornskov. / Quality clusters in general practice : associations between cluster organization and general practitioners' self-reported benefits. I: Family Practice. 2022 ; Bind 39, Nr. 5. s. 852–859.

Bibtex

@article{72776cd98d6d4e5999db8c1d51200703,
title = "Quality clusters in general practice: associations between cluster organization and general practitioners' self-reported benefits",
abstract = "Background Quality clusters were introduced as a quality improvement concept in Danish general practice in 2018. This new concept anchored quality improvement in local clusters managed by general practitioners (GPs). Objectives To describe the cluster organization and GPs' self-reported benefits of participating in them and explore the associations between cluster organization and self-reported benefits. Methods A national survey in Danish general practice gathering information about cluster organization (cluster size, cluster meetings, participants, and content) and GPs' self-reported benefits (overall benefit, internal changes in the clinic, and improved external collaboration). Results One hundred and eight (95%) clusters and 1,219 GPs (36%) were included. Cluster size varied from 10 to 68 GPs (34 GPs on average). Approximately 70% of GPs reported moderate to very high overall benefit from cluster participation. Most GPs experienced changes in their clinic organization (68%), drug prescriptions (78%), and patient care (77%). Collaboration was reported improved between the GPs (86%), municipality (50%), and hospital (36.2%). GPs in clusters with 3-6 planned meetings per year (odds ratio [OR] 1.9; confidence interval [CI] 1.3-2.9), mixed meeting types (OR 1.7; CI 1.2-2.4), group work (OR 1.7; CI 1.1-2.5), and use of guidelines in their meetings (OR 1.8; CI 1.3-2.4) had statistically significantly higher odds for reporting overall benefit of participating in clusters compared with GPs in clusters without these characteristics. Conclusions Frequent and active meetings with a relevant meeting content are positively related to GPs' perceived benefits and with improved collaboration between GPs in the clusters. There seems to be a potential for developing collaboration with other healthcare providers.",
keywords = "general practice, primary healthcare, quality circles, Quality of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, quality improvement",
author = "Maria Bundgaard and Jarbol, {Dorte Ejg} and Jens S{\o}ndergaard and Kousgaard, {Marius Brostrom} and Sonja Wehberg and Pedersen, {Line Bjornskov}",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1093/fampra/cmac011",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "852–859",
journal = "Family Practice",
issn = "0263-2136",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality clusters in general practice

T2 - associations between cluster organization and general practitioners' self-reported benefits

AU - Bundgaard, Maria

AU - Jarbol, Dorte Ejg

AU - Søndergaard, Jens

AU - Kousgaard, Marius Brostrom

AU - Wehberg, Sonja

AU - Pedersen, Line Bjornskov

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Background Quality clusters were introduced as a quality improvement concept in Danish general practice in 2018. This new concept anchored quality improvement in local clusters managed by general practitioners (GPs). Objectives To describe the cluster organization and GPs' self-reported benefits of participating in them and explore the associations between cluster organization and self-reported benefits. Methods A national survey in Danish general practice gathering information about cluster organization (cluster size, cluster meetings, participants, and content) and GPs' self-reported benefits (overall benefit, internal changes in the clinic, and improved external collaboration). Results One hundred and eight (95%) clusters and 1,219 GPs (36%) were included. Cluster size varied from 10 to 68 GPs (34 GPs on average). Approximately 70% of GPs reported moderate to very high overall benefit from cluster participation. Most GPs experienced changes in their clinic organization (68%), drug prescriptions (78%), and patient care (77%). Collaboration was reported improved between the GPs (86%), municipality (50%), and hospital (36.2%). GPs in clusters with 3-6 planned meetings per year (odds ratio [OR] 1.9; confidence interval [CI] 1.3-2.9), mixed meeting types (OR 1.7; CI 1.2-2.4), group work (OR 1.7; CI 1.1-2.5), and use of guidelines in their meetings (OR 1.8; CI 1.3-2.4) had statistically significantly higher odds for reporting overall benefit of participating in clusters compared with GPs in clusters without these characteristics. Conclusions Frequent and active meetings with a relevant meeting content are positively related to GPs' perceived benefits and with improved collaboration between GPs in the clusters. There seems to be a potential for developing collaboration with other healthcare providers.

AB - Background Quality clusters were introduced as a quality improvement concept in Danish general practice in 2018. This new concept anchored quality improvement in local clusters managed by general practitioners (GPs). Objectives To describe the cluster organization and GPs' self-reported benefits of participating in them and explore the associations between cluster organization and self-reported benefits. Methods A national survey in Danish general practice gathering information about cluster organization (cluster size, cluster meetings, participants, and content) and GPs' self-reported benefits (overall benefit, internal changes in the clinic, and improved external collaboration). Results One hundred and eight (95%) clusters and 1,219 GPs (36%) were included. Cluster size varied from 10 to 68 GPs (34 GPs on average). Approximately 70% of GPs reported moderate to very high overall benefit from cluster participation. Most GPs experienced changes in their clinic organization (68%), drug prescriptions (78%), and patient care (77%). Collaboration was reported improved between the GPs (86%), municipality (50%), and hospital (36.2%). GPs in clusters with 3-6 planned meetings per year (odds ratio [OR] 1.9; confidence interval [CI] 1.3-2.9), mixed meeting types (OR 1.7; CI 1.2-2.4), group work (OR 1.7; CI 1.1-2.5), and use of guidelines in their meetings (OR 1.8; CI 1.3-2.4) had statistically significantly higher odds for reporting overall benefit of participating in clusters compared with GPs in clusters without these characteristics. Conclusions Frequent and active meetings with a relevant meeting content are positively related to GPs' perceived benefits and with improved collaboration between GPs in the clusters. There seems to be a potential for developing collaboration with other healthcare providers.

KW - general practice

KW - primary healthcare

KW - quality circles

KW - Quality of Health Care

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

KW - quality improvement

U2 - 10.1093/fampra/cmac011

DO - 10.1093/fampra/cmac011

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35302605

VL - 39

SP - 852

EP - 859

JO - Family Practice

JF - Family Practice

SN - 0263-2136

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 302149957