Choosing the most appropriate PROM for clinical studies in sports medicine: Article two in a series of ten

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Choosing the most appropriate PROM for clinical studies in sports medicine : Article two in a series of ten. / Comins, Jonathan D.; Brodersen, John; Siersma, Volkert; Jensen, Jonas; Hansen, Christian Fugl; Krogsgaard, Michael R.

I: Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, Bind 31, Nr. 6, 2021, s. 1209-1215.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Comins, JD, Brodersen, J, Siersma, V, Jensen, J, Hansen, CF & Krogsgaard, MR 2021, 'Choosing the most appropriate PROM for clinical studies in sports medicine: Article two in a series of ten', Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, bind 31, nr. 6, s. 1209-1215. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13906

APA

Comins, J. D., Brodersen, J., Siersma, V., Jensen, J., Hansen, C. F., & Krogsgaard, M. R. (2021). Choosing the most appropriate PROM for clinical studies in sports medicine: Article two in a series of ten. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 31(6), 1209-1215. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13906

Vancouver

Comins JD, Brodersen J, Siersma V, Jensen J, Hansen CF, Krogsgaard MR. Choosing the most appropriate PROM for clinical studies in sports medicine: Article two in a series of ten. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. 2021;31(6):1209-1215. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13906

Author

Comins, Jonathan D. ; Brodersen, John ; Siersma, Volkert ; Jensen, Jonas ; Hansen, Christian Fugl ; Krogsgaard, Michael R. / Choosing the most appropriate PROM for clinical studies in sports medicine : Article two in a series of ten. I: Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. 2021 ; Bind 31, Nr. 6. s. 1209-1215.

Bibtex

@article{c23954fdad0f4cdeacbe212ec6afc087,
title = "Choosing the most appropriate PROM for clinical studies in sports medicine: Article two in a series of ten",
abstract = "Choosing the most appropriate patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for a clinical study is essential in order to achieve trustworthy results. This choice will depend on (a) the objective of the study and hence the research question; (b) the choice of a theoretical framework, such as the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF); (c) whether there currently is a PROM that possesses high content validity and high construct validity for the specific patient group and objective, and if not; (d) the decision on whether to use a suboptimal PROM or develop and validate a new PROM. This paper presents the steps that should be followed in order to assess the relevance of PROMs and suggests ways to enhance the choice depending on the goal of the study.",
keywords = "condition-specific PROM, generic PROM, PICO, sports medicine, WHO-ICF",
author = "Comins, {Jonathan D.} and John Brodersen and Volkert Siersma and Jonas Jensen and Hansen, {Christian Fugl} and Krogsgaard, {Michael R.}",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1111/sms.13906",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "1209--1215",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports",
issn = "0905-7188",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Choosing the most appropriate PROM for clinical studies in sports medicine

T2 - Article two in a series of ten

AU - Comins, Jonathan D.

AU - Brodersen, John

AU - Siersma, Volkert

AU - Jensen, Jonas

AU - Hansen, Christian Fugl

AU - Krogsgaard, Michael R.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Choosing the most appropriate patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for a clinical study is essential in order to achieve trustworthy results. This choice will depend on (a) the objective of the study and hence the research question; (b) the choice of a theoretical framework, such as the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF); (c) whether there currently is a PROM that possesses high content validity and high construct validity for the specific patient group and objective, and if not; (d) the decision on whether to use a suboptimal PROM or develop and validate a new PROM. This paper presents the steps that should be followed in order to assess the relevance of PROMs and suggests ways to enhance the choice depending on the goal of the study.

AB - Choosing the most appropriate patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for a clinical study is essential in order to achieve trustworthy results. This choice will depend on (a) the objective of the study and hence the research question; (b) the choice of a theoretical framework, such as the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF); (c) whether there currently is a PROM that possesses high content validity and high construct validity for the specific patient group and objective, and if not; (d) the decision on whether to use a suboptimal PROM or develop and validate a new PROM. This paper presents the steps that should be followed in order to assess the relevance of PROMs and suggests ways to enhance the choice depending on the goal of the study.

KW - condition-specific PROM

KW - generic PROM

KW - PICO

KW - sports medicine

KW - WHO-ICF

U2 - 10.1111/sms.13906

DO - 10.1111/sms.13906

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33342023

AN - SCOPUS:85098246155

VL - 31

SP - 1209

EP - 1215

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports

SN - 0905-7188

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 255776736