Agreement Between Clinically Measured Weight and Self-reported Weight Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Through an mHealth Lifestyle Coaching Program in Denmark: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 2,34 MB, PDF-dokument

  • Albi Imeraj
  • Thomas Bastholm Olesen
  • Ditte Hjorth Laursen
  • Jens Søndergaard
  • Carl Joakim Brandt
Background:
Digital health interventions are increasingly used to handle and promote positive health behaviors. Clinical measures are often used, and a certain precision is essential for digital health interventions to have an effect. Only few studies have compared clinically measured weights with self-reported weights. No study has examined the validity of self-reported weight from a mobile app used in a tailored weight loss intervention.

Objective:
The aim of this study was to analyze the agreement between clinically measured weight and self-reported weight collected from a mobile health lifestyle coaching program during a 12-month weight loss intervention for obese patients with and without type 2 diabetes. The secondary aim was to investigate the determinants for possible discrepancies between clinically measured and self-reported weights of these patients with different demographic and lifestyle characteristics and achievements of weight loss goals.

Methods:
Weight registrations were collected from participants (N=104) in a Danish randomized controlled trial examining the effect of a digital lifestyle intervention on weight loss among obese patients with and without type 2 diabetes. Data were collected at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. Self-reported weight was measured at home and registered in the app.

Results:
Self-reported body weight was lower than the weight measured in the clinic after 6 months by 1.03 kg (95% CI 1.01-1.05; P<.001) and after 12 months also by 1.03 kg (95% CI 0.99-1.04; P<.001). After 6 months, baseline weight and BMI were associated with a discrepancy of 0.03 kg (95% CI 0.01-0.04; P=.01) and 0.09 kg (95% CI 0.02-0.17; P=.02) per increment of 1 kg and 1 kg/m2, respectively, between clinically measured weight and self-reported weight. Weight change during the first 6 months was also associated with a difference of 0.1 kg (95% CI 0.04-0.01; P<.001) per kilogram of difference in weight between clinically measured weight and self-reported weight. Participants who did not achieve the 5% weight loss goal underestimated their weight by 0.79 kg (95% CI 0.34-1.23) at 6 months. After 12 months, only baseline weight was associated with a discrepancy of 0.03 kg (95% CI 0.01-0.05; P=.02) per increment of kilogram between clinically measured weight and self-reported weight. None of the other factors showed any significant discrepancy after 12 months.

Conclusions:
Self-reported weight obtained from mobile health is a valid method for collecting anthropometric measurements
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummere40739
TidsskriftJMIR Formative Research
Vol/bind6
Udgave nummer9
Antal sider13
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
CJB initiated this study in continuation of research in his PhD dissertation, which was done at the Research Unit for General Practice at University of Southern Denmark (thesis defended on August 2018) [16]). This study was partly funded by Liva Healthcare A/S. A formal research agreement has been made between Liva Healthcare A/S and the University of Southern Denmark to guide the running and financial aspects of the project. The patients in this study were not economically compensated for their participation. Lastly, we want to thank TBO for assisting us during the statistical analysis.

Publisher Copyright:
©Albi Imeraj, Thomas Bastholm Olesen, Ditte Hjorth Laursen, Jens Søndergaard, Carl Joakim Brandt.

ID: 335612720