Accountability in Health Care

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Accountability in Health Care. / Vrangbæk, Karsten; Byrkjeflot, Haldor.

Oxford Handbook of Health Care Management . red. / Ewan Ferlie; Kathleen Montgomery; Anne Reff Pedersen. Oxford; New York : Oxford University Press, 2016. s. 481-495 (Oxford Handbooks).

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Vrangbæk, K & Byrkjeflot, H 2016, Accountability in Health Care. i E Ferlie, K Montgomery & A Reff Pedersen (red), Oxford Handbook of Health Care Management . Oxford University Press, Oxford; New York, Oxford Handbooks, s. 481-495.

APA

Vrangbæk, K., & Byrkjeflot, H. (2016). Accountability in Health Care. I E. Ferlie, K. Montgomery, & A. Reff Pedersen (red.), Oxford Handbook of Health Care Management (s. 481-495). Oxford University Press. Oxford Handbooks

Vancouver

Vrangbæk K, Byrkjeflot H. Accountability in Health Care. I Ferlie E, Montgomery K, Reff Pedersen A, red., Oxford Handbook of Health Care Management . Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. 2016. s. 481-495. (Oxford Handbooks).

Author

Vrangbæk, Karsten ; Byrkjeflot, Haldor. / Accountability in Health Care. Oxford Handbook of Health Care Management . red. / Ewan Ferlie ; Kathleen Montgomery ; Anne Reff Pedersen. Oxford; New York : Oxford University Press, 2016. s. 481-495 (Oxford Handbooks).

Bibtex

@inbook{b5b3fea24277420084657a65ce5fd855,
title = "Accountability in Health Care",
abstract = "The debate on accountability within the public sector has been lively in the past decade. Significant progress has been made in developing conceptual frameworks and typologies for characterizing different features and functions of accountability. However, there is a lack of sector specific adjustment of such frameworks. In this article we present a framework for analyzing accountability within health care. The paper makes use of the concept of {"}accountability regime{"} to signify the combination of different accountability forms, directions and functions at any given point in time. We show that reforms can introduce new forms of accountability, change existing accountability relations or change the relative importance of different accountability forms. They may also change the dominant direction and shift the balance between different functions of accountability. We further suggest that developments in accountability regimes are best analyzed with a combination of top-down and bottom up perspectives and that there is a need to develop research strategies to support this aim. ",
author = "Karsten Vrangb{\ae}k and Haldor Byrkjeflot",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780198705109",
series = "Oxford Handbooks",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
pages = "481--495",
editor = "Ewan Ferlie and Kathleen Montgomery and {Reff Pedersen}, Anne",
booktitle = "Oxford Handbook of Health Care Management",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Accountability in Health Care

AU - Vrangbæk, Karsten

AU - Byrkjeflot, Haldor

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The debate on accountability within the public sector has been lively in the past decade. Significant progress has been made in developing conceptual frameworks and typologies for characterizing different features and functions of accountability. However, there is a lack of sector specific adjustment of such frameworks. In this article we present a framework for analyzing accountability within health care. The paper makes use of the concept of "accountability regime" to signify the combination of different accountability forms, directions and functions at any given point in time. We show that reforms can introduce new forms of accountability, change existing accountability relations or change the relative importance of different accountability forms. They may also change the dominant direction and shift the balance between different functions of accountability. We further suggest that developments in accountability regimes are best analyzed with a combination of top-down and bottom up perspectives and that there is a need to develop research strategies to support this aim.

AB - The debate on accountability within the public sector has been lively in the past decade. Significant progress has been made in developing conceptual frameworks and typologies for characterizing different features and functions of accountability. However, there is a lack of sector specific adjustment of such frameworks. In this article we present a framework for analyzing accountability within health care. The paper makes use of the concept of "accountability regime" to signify the combination of different accountability forms, directions and functions at any given point in time. We show that reforms can introduce new forms of accountability, change existing accountability relations or change the relative importance of different accountability forms. They may also change the dominant direction and shift the balance between different functions of accountability. We further suggest that developments in accountability regimes are best analyzed with a combination of top-down and bottom up perspectives and that there is a need to develop research strategies to support this aim.

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9780198705109

T3 - Oxford Handbooks

SP - 481

EP - 495

BT - Oxford Handbook of Health Care Management

A2 - Ferlie, Ewan

A2 - Montgomery, Kathleen

A2 - Reff Pedersen, Anne

PB - Oxford University Press

CY - Oxford; New York

ER -

ID: 138174859