Body weight and sensitivity of screening mammography

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Body weight and sensitivity of screening mammography. / Njor, Sisse H.; von Euler-Chelpin, My; Tjønneland, Anne; Vejborg, Ilse; Lynge, Elsebeth.

I: European Journal of Cancer, Bind 60, 06.2016, s. 93-100.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Njor, SH, von Euler-Chelpin, M, Tjønneland, A, Vejborg, I & Lynge, E 2016, 'Body weight and sensitivity of screening mammography', European Journal of Cancer, bind 60, s. 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.02.028

APA

Njor, S. H., von Euler-Chelpin, M., Tjønneland, A., Vejborg, I., & Lynge, E. (2016). Body weight and sensitivity of screening mammography. European Journal of Cancer, 60, 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.02.028

Vancouver

Njor SH, von Euler-Chelpin M, Tjønneland A, Vejborg I, Lynge E. Body weight and sensitivity of screening mammography. European Journal of Cancer. 2016 jun.;60:93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.02.028

Author

Njor, Sisse H. ; von Euler-Chelpin, My ; Tjønneland, Anne ; Vejborg, Ilse ; Lynge, Elsebeth. / Body weight and sensitivity of screening mammography. I: European Journal of Cancer. 2016 ; Bind 60. s. 93-100.

Bibtex

@article{df683a21d05e4ff9af27491db2208a89,
title = "Body weight and sensitivity of screening mammography",
abstract = "Aim: Obese women tend to participate less in breast cancer screening than normal weight women. However, obese women have fattier breast than normal weight women, and screening mammography works better in fatty than in dense breasts. One might, therefore, hypothesise that obese women would actually benefit more from screening than other women. Methods: We combined data from the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health study and the organised population-based screening mammography programme in Copenhagen, Denmark. Women were categorised according to body mass index (BMI) (<20; 20 to <25; 25 to <30; 30 to <35, and 35+). We measured recall rate, sensitivity and specificity for subsequent screens with a 2-year follow-up period. Results: The study included 6787 women. The recall rate varied from 1.4% for women with BMI <20 to 1.9% for women with BMI 35+, test for trend p = 0.86. Sensitivity varied from 42% (95% confidence interval [CI] 20–64%) for women with BMI <20 to 100% (95% CI 69–100%) for women with BMI 35+, test for trend p = 0.015. Specificity was fairly constant across BMI levels, being on average 98.8%, test for trend p = 0.79. Conclusion: This study showed that obese women were the ones with the highest sensitivity of screening mammography, while the specificity of screening remained stable across weight groups. Screening programmes should be organized to encourage these women to overcome obstacles for participation.",
keywords = "Breast cancer, Obesity, Screening",
author = "Njor, {Sisse H.} and {von Euler-Chelpin}, My and Anne Tj{\o}nneland and Ilse Vejborg and Elsebeth Lynge",
year = "2016",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1016/j.ejca.2016.02.028",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "93--100",
journal = "European Journal of Cancer, Supplement",
issn = "0959-8049",
publisher = "Pergamon",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Body weight and sensitivity of screening mammography

AU - Njor, Sisse H.

AU - von Euler-Chelpin, My

AU - Tjønneland, Anne

AU - Vejborg, Ilse

AU - Lynge, Elsebeth

PY - 2016/6

Y1 - 2016/6

N2 - Aim: Obese women tend to participate less in breast cancer screening than normal weight women. However, obese women have fattier breast than normal weight women, and screening mammography works better in fatty than in dense breasts. One might, therefore, hypothesise that obese women would actually benefit more from screening than other women. Methods: We combined data from the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health study and the organised population-based screening mammography programme in Copenhagen, Denmark. Women were categorised according to body mass index (BMI) (<20; 20 to <25; 25 to <30; 30 to <35, and 35+). We measured recall rate, sensitivity and specificity for subsequent screens with a 2-year follow-up period. Results: The study included 6787 women. The recall rate varied from 1.4% for women with BMI <20 to 1.9% for women with BMI 35+, test for trend p = 0.86. Sensitivity varied from 42% (95% confidence interval [CI] 20–64%) for women with BMI <20 to 100% (95% CI 69–100%) for women with BMI 35+, test for trend p = 0.015. Specificity was fairly constant across BMI levels, being on average 98.8%, test for trend p = 0.79. Conclusion: This study showed that obese women were the ones with the highest sensitivity of screening mammography, while the specificity of screening remained stable across weight groups. Screening programmes should be organized to encourage these women to overcome obstacles for participation.

AB - Aim: Obese women tend to participate less in breast cancer screening than normal weight women. However, obese women have fattier breast than normal weight women, and screening mammography works better in fatty than in dense breasts. One might, therefore, hypothesise that obese women would actually benefit more from screening than other women. Methods: We combined data from the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health study and the organised population-based screening mammography programme in Copenhagen, Denmark. Women were categorised according to body mass index (BMI) (<20; 20 to <25; 25 to <30; 30 to <35, and 35+). We measured recall rate, sensitivity and specificity for subsequent screens with a 2-year follow-up period. Results: The study included 6787 women. The recall rate varied from 1.4% for women with BMI <20 to 1.9% for women with BMI 35+, test for trend p = 0.86. Sensitivity varied from 42% (95% confidence interval [CI] 20–64%) for women with BMI <20 to 100% (95% CI 69–100%) for women with BMI 35+, test for trend p = 0.015. Specificity was fairly constant across BMI levels, being on average 98.8%, test for trend p = 0.79. Conclusion: This study showed that obese women were the ones with the highest sensitivity of screening mammography, while the specificity of screening remained stable across weight groups. Screening programmes should be organized to encourage these women to overcome obstacles for participation.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Obesity

KW - Screening

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.02.028

DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.02.028

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27085424

VL - 60

SP - 93

EP - 100

JO - European Journal of Cancer, Supplement

JF - European Journal of Cancer, Supplement

SN - 0959-8049

ER -

ID: 162671697