The use of prognostic scores for causal inference with general treatment regimes

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


In nonrandomised studies, inferring causal effects requires appropriate methods for addressing confounding bias. Although it is common to adopt propensity score analysis to this purpose, prognostic score analysis has recently been proposed as an alternative strategy. While both approaches were originally introduced to estimate causal effects for binary interventions, the theory of propensity score has since been extended to the case of general treatment regimes. Indeed, many treatments are not assigned in a binary fashion and require a certain extent of dosing. Hence, researchers may often be interested in estimating treatment effects across multiple exposures. To the best of our knowledge, the prognostic score analysis has not been yet generalised to this case. In this article, we describe the theory of prognostic scores for causal inference with general treatment regimes. Our methods can be applied to compare multiple treatments using nonrandomised data, a topic of great relevance in contemporary evaluations of clinical interventions. We propose estimators for the average treatment effects in different populations of interest, the validity of which is assessed through a series of simulations. Finally, we present an illustrative case in which we estimate the effect of the delay to Aspirin administration on a composite outcome of death or dependence at 6 months in stroke patients.

Original languageEnglish
JournalStatistics in Medicine
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)2013-2029
Number of pages17
Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Research areas

  • causal inference, multiple treatment exposures, observational study, prognostic score

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and

No data available

ID: 218395518