Recommendations on the use of item libraries for patient-reported outcome measurement in oncology trials: findings from an international, multidisciplinary working group
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review
Standard
Recommendations on the use of item libraries for patient-reported outcome measurement in oncology trials : findings from an international, multidisciplinary working group. / Piccinin, Claire; Basch, Ethan; Bhatnagar, Vishal; Calvert, Melanie; Campbell, Alicyn; Cella, David; Cleeland, Charles S; Coens, Corneel; Darlington, Anne-Sophie; Dueck, Amylou C; Groenvold, Mogens; Herold, Ralf; King-Kallimanis, Bellinda L; Kluetz, Paul G; Kuliś, Dagmara; O'Connor, Daniel; Oliver, Kathy; Pe, Madeline; Reeve, Bryce B; Reijneveld, Jaap C; Wang, Xin Shelley; Bottomley, Andrew.
In: The Lancet Oncology, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2023, p. e86-e95.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Recommendations on the use of item libraries for patient-reported outcome measurement in oncology trials
T2 - findings from an international, multidisciplinary working group
AU - Piccinin, Claire
AU - Basch, Ethan
AU - Bhatnagar, Vishal
AU - Calvert, Melanie
AU - Campbell, Alicyn
AU - Cella, David
AU - Cleeland, Charles S
AU - Coens, Corneel
AU - Darlington, Anne-Sophie
AU - Dueck, Amylou C
AU - Groenvold, Mogens
AU - Herold, Ralf
AU - King-Kallimanis, Bellinda L
AU - Kluetz, Paul G
AU - Kuliś, Dagmara
AU - O'Connor, Daniel
AU - Oliver, Kathy
AU - Pe, Madeline
AU - Reeve, Bryce B
AU - Reijneveld, Jaap C
AU - Wang, Xin Shelley
AU - Bottomley, Andrew
N1 - Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - The use of item libraries for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement in oncology allows for the customisation of PRO assessment to measure key health-related quality of life concepts of relevance to the target population and intervention. However, no high-level recommendations exist to guide users on the design and implementation of these customised PRO measures (item lists) across different PRO measurement systems. To address this issue, a working group was set up, including international stakeholders (academic, independent, industry, health technology assessment, regulatory, and patient advocacy), with the goal of creating recommendations for the use of item libraries in oncology trials. A scoping review was carried out to identify relevant publications and highlight any gaps. Stakeholders commented on the available guidance for each research question, proposed recommendations on how to address gaps in the literature, and came to an agreement using discussion-based methods. Nine primary research questions were identified that formed the scope and structure of the recommendations on how to select items and implement item lists created from item libraries. These recommendations address methods to drive item selection, plan the structure and analysis of item lists, and facilitate their use in conjunction with other measures. The findings resulted in high-level, instrument-agnostic recommendations on the use of item-library-derived item lists in oncology trials.
AB - The use of item libraries for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement in oncology allows for the customisation of PRO assessment to measure key health-related quality of life concepts of relevance to the target population and intervention. However, no high-level recommendations exist to guide users on the design and implementation of these customised PRO measures (item lists) across different PRO measurement systems. To address this issue, a working group was set up, including international stakeholders (academic, independent, industry, health technology assessment, regulatory, and patient advocacy), with the goal of creating recommendations for the use of item libraries in oncology trials. A scoping review was carried out to identify relevant publications and highlight any gaps. Stakeholders commented on the available guidance for each research question, proposed recommendations on how to address gaps in the literature, and came to an agreement using discussion-based methods. Nine primary research questions were identified that formed the scope and structure of the recommendations on how to select items and implement item lists created from item libraries. These recommendations address methods to drive item selection, plan the structure and analysis of item lists, and facilitate their use in conjunction with other measures. The findings resulted in high-level, instrument-agnostic recommendations on the use of item-library-derived item lists in oncology trials.
KW - Humans
KW - Quality of Life
KW - Neoplasms/therapy
KW - Patient Reported Outcome Measures
KW - Medical Oncology
KW - Patient Outcome Assessment
U2 - 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00654-4
DO - 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00654-4
M3 - Review
C2 - 36725153
VL - 24
SP - e86-e95
JO - The Lancet Oncology
JF - The Lancet Oncology
SN - 1470-2045
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 338355923