Inter-Day Test-Retest Reproducibility of the CAT, CCQ, HADS and EQ-5D-3L in Patients with Severe and Very Severe COPD
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Inter-Day Test-Retest Reproducibility of the CAT, CCQ, HADS and EQ-5D-3L in Patients with Severe and Very Severe COPD. / Hansen, Henrik; Beyer, Nina; Frolich, Anne; Godtfredsen, Nina; Bieler, Theresa.
In: Patient Related Outcome Measures, Vol. 12, 2021, p. 117-128.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Inter-Day Test-Retest Reproducibility of the CAT, CCQ, HADS and EQ-5D-3L in Patients with Severe and Very Severe COPD
AU - Hansen, Henrik
AU - Beyer, Nina
AU - Frolich, Anne
AU - Godtfredsen, Nina
AU - Bieler, Theresa
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Introduction: In patients with COPD, the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D-3L) are widely used patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of respiratory symptoms, anxiety, depression and quality of life. Despite established validity, responsiveness and minimal important change (MIC), the reproducibility and especially important agreement parameters remain unreported in these frequently used PROMs. The aim of this study was to investigate the inter-day test-retest reliability and agreement of the CAT, CCQ, HADS and EQ-5D-3L in patients with severe and very severe COPD (FEV1Patients and Methods: Fifty patients (22 females, mean [SD] age 67 [9] yrs.; FEV1 32[9] %; 6-minute walk distance 347 [102] meters; CAT 21 [6] points; BMI: 26 [6] kg/m(2)) completed the questionnaires (CAT, CCQ, HADS, EQ-5D-3L) in combination with functional performance test instructed by one assessor on test-day one (T1) and by another assessor 7-10 days later on testday two (T2).Results: The inter-day test-retest reliability ICC was 0.88 (LL95CI: 0.80) for CAT; 0.69 (LL95CI: 0.46) for CCQ; 0.86 (LL95CI: 0.75) and 0.90 (LL95CI: 0.82) for HADS-anxiety (A) and depression (D) and 0.87 (LL95CI: 0.76) for EQ-5D-VAS. The corresponding agreements within a single measurement (standard error of measurement, SEM) and for repeated measurement errors (smallest real difference, SRD) were respectively 2.1 and 2.9 points for CAT; 0.5 and 0.7 points for CCQ total; 1.3 and 1.9 points for HADS-A; 0.9 and 1.3 points for HADS-D and 6.8 and 9.7 VAS-score for EQ-5D-3L, respectively. Ceiling/flooring effect was present inConclusion: In patients with severe and very severe COPD, the CAT, CCQ, HADS and EQ-5D-3L questionnaires presented moderate to excellent inter-day test-retest reliability, and no floor or ceiling effect was documented for any of the questionnaires. Only CAT and HADS had an acceptable SRD below the established MIC for assessing change over time on group level, and none of the PROMS were fit to assess individual changes over time.
AB - Introduction: In patients with COPD, the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D-3L) are widely used patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of respiratory symptoms, anxiety, depression and quality of life. Despite established validity, responsiveness and minimal important change (MIC), the reproducibility and especially important agreement parameters remain unreported in these frequently used PROMs. The aim of this study was to investigate the inter-day test-retest reliability and agreement of the CAT, CCQ, HADS and EQ-5D-3L in patients with severe and very severe COPD (FEV1Patients and Methods: Fifty patients (22 females, mean [SD] age 67 [9] yrs.; FEV1 32[9] %; 6-minute walk distance 347 [102] meters; CAT 21 [6] points; BMI: 26 [6] kg/m(2)) completed the questionnaires (CAT, CCQ, HADS, EQ-5D-3L) in combination with functional performance test instructed by one assessor on test-day one (T1) and by another assessor 7-10 days later on testday two (T2).Results: The inter-day test-retest reliability ICC was 0.88 (LL95CI: 0.80) for CAT; 0.69 (LL95CI: 0.46) for CCQ; 0.86 (LL95CI: 0.75) and 0.90 (LL95CI: 0.82) for HADS-anxiety (A) and depression (D) and 0.87 (LL95CI: 0.76) for EQ-5D-VAS. The corresponding agreements within a single measurement (standard error of measurement, SEM) and for repeated measurement errors (smallest real difference, SRD) were respectively 2.1 and 2.9 points for CAT; 0.5 and 0.7 points for CCQ total; 1.3 and 1.9 points for HADS-A; 0.9 and 1.3 points for HADS-D and 6.8 and 9.7 VAS-score for EQ-5D-3L, respectively. Ceiling/flooring effect was present inConclusion: In patients with severe and very severe COPD, the CAT, CCQ, HADS and EQ-5D-3L questionnaires presented moderate to excellent inter-day test-retest reliability, and no floor or ceiling effect was documented for any of the questionnaires. Only CAT and HADS had an acceptable SRD below the established MIC for assessing change over time on group level, and none of the PROMS were fit to assess individual changes over time.
KW - COPD
KW - questionnaires
KW - patient reported outcomes
KW - reproducibility of results
KW - CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE
KW - HOME-BASED REHABILITATION
KW - HEALTH-STATUS
KW - PULMONARY REHABILITATION
KW - STATISTICAL-METHODS
KW - PALLIATIVE CARE
KW - RELIABILITY
KW - QUESTIONNAIRE
KW - VALIDATION
KW - AGREEMENT
U2 - 10.2147/PROM.S306352
DO - 10.2147/PROM.S306352
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34104024
VL - 12
SP - 117
EP - 128
JO - Patient Related Outcome Measures
JF - Patient Related Outcome Measures
SN - 1179-271X
ER -
ID: 271868797