Early goal-directed nutrition versus standard of care in adult intensive care patients: the single-centre, randomised, outcome assessor-blinded EAT-ICU trial
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Early goal-directed nutrition versus standard of care in adult intensive care patients : the single-centre, randomised, outcome assessor-blinded EAT-ICU trial. / Allingstrup, Matilde Jo; Kondrup, Jens; Wiis, Jørgen; Claudius, Casper; Pedersen, Ulf Gøttrup; Hein-Rasmussen, Rikke; Bjerregaard, Mads Rye; Steensen, Morten; Jensen, Tom Hartvig; Lange, Theis; Madsen, Martin Bruun; Møller, Morten Hylander; Perner, Anders.
In: Intensive Care Medicine, Vol. 43, No. 11, 11.2017, p. 1637-1647.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Early goal-directed nutrition versus standard of care in adult intensive care patients
T2 - the single-centre, randomised, outcome assessor-blinded EAT-ICU trial
AU - Allingstrup, Matilde Jo
AU - Kondrup, Jens
AU - Wiis, Jørgen
AU - Claudius, Casper
AU - Pedersen, Ulf Gøttrup
AU - Hein-Rasmussen, Rikke
AU - Bjerregaard, Mads Rye
AU - Steensen, Morten
AU - Jensen, Tom Hartvig
AU - Lange, Theis
AU - Madsen, Martin Bruun
AU - Møller, Morten Hylander
AU - Perner, Anders
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - Purpose: We assessed the effects of early goal-directed nutrition (EGDN) vs. standard nutritional care in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients.Methods: We randomised acutely admitted, mechanically ventilated ICU patients expected to stay longer than 3 days in the ICU. In the EGDN group we estimated nutritional requirements by indirect calorimetry and 24-h urinary urea aiming at covering 100% of requirements from the first full trial day using enteral and parenteral nutrition. In the standard of care group we aimed at providing 25 kcal/kg/day by enteral nutrition. If this was not met by day 7, patients were supplemented with parenteral nutrition. The primary outcome was physical component summary (PCS) score of SF-36 at 6 months. We performed multiple imputation for data of the non-responders.Results: We randomised 203 patients and included 199 in the intention-to-treat analyses; baseline variables were reasonably balanced between the two groups. The EGDN group had less negative energy (p < 0.001) and protein (p < 0.001) balances in the ICU as compared to the standard of care group. The PCS score at 6 months did not differ between the two groups (mean difference 0.0, 95% CI −5.9 to 5.8, p = 0.99); neither did mortality, rates of organ failures, serious adverse reactions or infections in the ICU, length of ICU or hospital stay, or days alive without life support at 90 days.Conclusions: EGDN did not appear to affect physical quality of life at 6 months or other important outcomes as compared to standard nutrition care in acutely admitted, mechanically ventilated, adult ICU patients.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier no. NCT01372176.
AB - Purpose: We assessed the effects of early goal-directed nutrition (EGDN) vs. standard nutritional care in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients.Methods: We randomised acutely admitted, mechanically ventilated ICU patients expected to stay longer than 3 days in the ICU. In the EGDN group we estimated nutritional requirements by indirect calorimetry and 24-h urinary urea aiming at covering 100% of requirements from the first full trial day using enteral and parenteral nutrition. In the standard of care group we aimed at providing 25 kcal/kg/day by enteral nutrition. If this was not met by day 7, patients were supplemented with parenteral nutrition. The primary outcome was physical component summary (PCS) score of SF-36 at 6 months. We performed multiple imputation for data of the non-responders.Results: We randomised 203 patients and included 199 in the intention-to-treat analyses; baseline variables were reasonably balanced between the two groups. The EGDN group had less negative energy (p < 0.001) and protein (p < 0.001) balances in the ICU as compared to the standard of care group. The PCS score at 6 months did not differ between the two groups (mean difference 0.0, 95% CI −5.9 to 5.8, p = 0.99); neither did mortality, rates of organ failures, serious adverse reactions or infections in the ICU, length of ICU or hospital stay, or days alive without life support at 90 days.Conclusions: EGDN did not appear to affect physical quality of life at 6 months or other important outcomes as compared to standard nutrition care in acutely admitted, mechanically ventilated, adult ICU patients.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier no. NCT01372176.
KW - Critical care
KW - Nutrition
KW - Protein
KW - Indirect calorimetry
KW - Quality of life
KW - Clinical outcome
U2 - 10.1007/s00134-017-4880-3
DO - 10.1007/s00134-017-4880-3
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 28936712
VL - 43
SP - 1637
EP - 1647
JO - European Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
JF - European Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
SN - 0935-1701
IS - 11
ER -
ID: 185228434