Early goal-directed nutrition versus standard of care in adult intensive care patients: the single-centre, randomised, outcome assessor-blinded EAT-ICU trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Early goal-directed nutrition versus standard of care in adult intensive care patients : the single-centre, randomised, outcome assessor-blinded EAT-ICU trial. / Allingstrup, Matilde Jo; Kondrup, Jens; Wiis, Jørgen; Claudius, Casper; Pedersen, Ulf Gøttrup; Hein-Rasmussen, Rikke; Bjerregaard, Mads Rye; Steensen, Morten; Jensen, Tom Hartvig; Lange, Theis; Madsen, Martin Bruun; Møller, Morten Hylander; Perner, Anders.

In: Intensive Care Medicine, Vol. 43, No. 11, 11.2017, p. 1637-1647.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Allingstrup, MJ, Kondrup, J, Wiis, J, Claudius, C, Pedersen, UG, Hein-Rasmussen, R, Bjerregaard, MR, Steensen, M, Jensen, TH, Lange, T, Madsen, MB, Møller, MH & Perner, A 2017, 'Early goal-directed nutrition versus standard of care in adult intensive care patients: the single-centre, randomised, outcome assessor-blinded EAT-ICU trial', Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 1637-1647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4880-3

APA

Allingstrup, M. J., Kondrup, J., Wiis, J., Claudius, C., Pedersen, U. G., Hein-Rasmussen, R., Bjerregaard, M. R., Steensen, M., Jensen, T. H., Lange, T., Madsen, M. B., Møller, M. H., & Perner, A. (2017). Early goal-directed nutrition versus standard of care in adult intensive care patients: the single-centre, randomised, outcome assessor-blinded EAT-ICU trial. Intensive Care Medicine, 43(11), 1637-1647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4880-3

Vancouver

Allingstrup MJ, Kondrup J, Wiis J, Claudius C, Pedersen UG, Hein-Rasmussen R et al. Early goal-directed nutrition versus standard of care in adult intensive care patients: the single-centre, randomised, outcome assessor-blinded EAT-ICU trial. Intensive Care Medicine. 2017 Nov;43(11):1637-1647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4880-3

Author

Allingstrup, Matilde Jo ; Kondrup, Jens ; Wiis, Jørgen ; Claudius, Casper ; Pedersen, Ulf Gøttrup ; Hein-Rasmussen, Rikke ; Bjerregaard, Mads Rye ; Steensen, Morten ; Jensen, Tom Hartvig ; Lange, Theis ; Madsen, Martin Bruun ; Møller, Morten Hylander ; Perner, Anders. / Early goal-directed nutrition versus standard of care in adult intensive care patients : the single-centre, randomised, outcome assessor-blinded EAT-ICU trial. In: Intensive Care Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 43, No. 11. pp. 1637-1647.

Bibtex

@article{c76073b26b5949cf86aebc2bc65e1c04,
title = "Early goal-directed nutrition versus standard of care in adult intensive care patients: the single-centre, randomised, outcome assessor-blinded EAT-ICU trial",
abstract = "Purpose: We assessed the effects of early goal-directed nutrition (EGDN) vs. standard nutritional care in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients.Methods: We randomised acutely admitted, mechanically ventilated ICU patients expected to stay longer than 3 days in the ICU. In the EGDN group we estimated nutritional requirements by indirect calorimetry and 24-h urinary urea aiming at covering 100% of requirements from the first full trial day using enteral and parenteral nutrition. In the standard of care group we aimed at providing 25 kcal/kg/day by enteral nutrition. If this was not met by day 7, patients were supplemented with parenteral nutrition. The primary outcome was physical component summary (PCS) score of SF-36 at 6 months. We performed multiple imputation for data of the non-responders.Results: We randomised 203 patients and included 199 in the intention-to-treat analyses; baseline variables were reasonably balanced between the two groups. The EGDN group had less negative energy (p < 0.001) and protein (p < 0.001) balances in the ICU as compared to the standard of care group. The PCS score at 6 months did not differ between the two groups (mean difference 0.0, 95% CI −5.9 to 5.8, p = 0.99); neither did mortality, rates of organ failures, serious adverse reactions or infections in the ICU, length of ICU or hospital stay, or days alive without life support at 90 days.Conclusions: EGDN did not appear to affect physical quality of life at 6 months or other important outcomes as compared to standard nutrition care in acutely admitted, mechanically ventilated, adult ICU patients.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier no. NCT01372176.",
keywords = "Critical care, Nutrition, Protein, Indirect calorimetry, Quality of life, Clinical outcome",
author = "Allingstrup, {Matilde Jo} and Jens Kondrup and J{\o}rgen Wiis and Casper Claudius and Pedersen, {Ulf G{\o}ttrup} and Rikke Hein-Rasmussen and Bjerregaard, {Mads Rye} and Morten Steensen and Jensen, {Tom Hartvig} and Theis Lange and Madsen, {Martin Bruun} and M{\o}ller, {Morten Hylander} and Anders Perner",
year = "2017",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1007/s00134-017-4880-3",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "1637--1647",
journal = "European Journal of Intensive Care Medicine",
issn = "0935-1701",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Early goal-directed nutrition versus standard of care in adult intensive care patients

T2 - the single-centre, randomised, outcome assessor-blinded EAT-ICU trial

AU - Allingstrup, Matilde Jo

AU - Kondrup, Jens

AU - Wiis, Jørgen

AU - Claudius, Casper

AU - Pedersen, Ulf Gøttrup

AU - Hein-Rasmussen, Rikke

AU - Bjerregaard, Mads Rye

AU - Steensen, Morten

AU - Jensen, Tom Hartvig

AU - Lange, Theis

AU - Madsen, Martin Bruun

AU - Møller, Morten Hylander

AU - Perner, Anders

PY - 2017/11

Y1 - 2017/11

N2 - Purpose: We assessed the effects of early goal-directed nutrition (EGDN) vs. standard nutritional care in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients.Methods: We randomised acutely admitted, mechanically ventilated ICU patients expected to stay longer than 3 days in the ICU. In the EGDN group we estimated nutritional requirements by indirect calorimetry and 24-h urinary urea aiming at covering 100% of requirements from the first full trial day using enteral and parenteral nutrition. In the standard of care group we aimed at providing 25 kcal/kg/day by enteral nutrition. If this was not met by day 7, patients were supplemented with parenteral nutrition. The primary outcome was physical component summary (PCS) score of SF-36 at 6 months. We performed multiple imputation for data of the non-responders.Results: We randomised 203 patients and included 199 in the intention-to-treat analyses; baseline variables were reasonably balanced between the two groups. The EGDN group had less negative energy (p < 0.001) and protein (p < 0.001) balances in the ICU as compared to the standard of care group. The PCS score at 6 months did not differ between the two groups (mean difference 0.0, 95% CI −5.9 to 5.8, p = 0.99); neither did mortality, rates of organ failures, serious adverse reactions or infections in the ICU, length of ICU or hospital stay, or days alive without life support at 90 days.Conclusions: EGDN did not appear to affect physical quality of life at 6 months or other important outcomes as compared to standard nutrition care in acutely admitted, mechanically ventilated, adult ICU patients.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier no. NCT01372176.

AB - Purpose: We assessed the effects of early goal-directed nutrition (EGDN) vs. standard nutritional care in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients.Methods: We randomised acutely admitted, mechanically ventilated ICU patients expected to stay longer than 3 days in the ICU. In the EGDN group we estimated nutritional requirements by indirect calorimetry and 24-h urinary urea aiming at covering 100% of requirements from the first full trial day using enteral and parenteral nutrition. In the standard of care group we aimed at providing 25 kcal/kg/day by enteral nutrition. If this was not met by day 7, patients were supplemented with parenteral nutrition. The primary outcome was physical component summary (PCS) score of SF-36 at 6 months. We performed multiple imputation for data of the non-responders.Results: We randomised 203 patients and included 199 in the intention-to-treat analyses; baseline variables were reasonably balanced between the two groups. The EGDN group had less negative energy (p < 0.001) and protein (p < 0.001) balances in the ICU as compared to the standard of care group. The PCS score at 6 months did not differ between the two groups (mean difference 0.0, 95% CI −5.9 to 5.8, p = 0.99); neither did mortality, rates of organ failures, serious adverse reactions or infections in the ICU, length of ICU or hospital stay, or days alive without life support at 90 days.Conclusions: EGDN did not appear to affect physical quality of life at 6 months or other important outcomes as compared to standard nutrition care in acutely admitted, mechanically ventilated, adult ICU patients.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier no. NCT01372176.

KW - Critical care

KW - Nutrition

KW - Protein

KW - Indirect calorimetry

KW - Quality of life

KW - Clinical outcome

U2 - 10.1007/s00134-017-4880-3

DO - 10.1007/s00134-017-4880-3

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 28936712

VL - 43

SP - 1637

EP - 1647

JO - European Journal of Intensive Care Medicine

JF - European Journal of Intensive Care Medicine

SN - 0935-1701

IS - 11

ER -

ID: 185228434