Acceptability and usefulness of the EORTC ‘Write In three Symptoms/Problems’ (WISP): a brief open-ended instrument for symptom assessment in cancer patients

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Acceptability and usefulness of the EORTC ‘Write In three Symptoms/Problems’ (WISP) : a brief open-ended instrument for symptom assessment in cancer patients. / Rojas-Concha, Leslye; Arrarrás, Juan Ignacio; Conroy, Thierry; Chalk, Tara; Guberti, Monica; Holzner, Bernhard; Husson, Olga; Kuliś, Dagmara; Shamieh, Omar; Piccinin, Claire; Puga, María José; Rohde, Gudrun; Groenvold, Mogens.

In: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Vol. 22, No. 1, 28, 2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Rojas-Concha, L, Arrarrás, JI, Conroy, T, Chalk, T, Guberti, M, Holzner, B, Husson, O, Kuliś, D, Shamieh, O, Piccinin, C, Puga, MJ, Rohde, G & Groenvold, M 2024, 'Acceptability and usefulness of the EORTC ‘Write In three Symptoms/Problems’ (WISP): a brief open-ended instrument for symptom assessment in cancer patients', Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, vol. 22, no. 1, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-024-02244-z

APA

Rojas-Concha, L., Arrarrás, J. I., Conroy, T., Chalk, T., Guberti, M., Holzner, B., Husson, O., Kuliś, D., Shamieh, O., Piccinin, C., Puga, M. J., Rohde, G., & Groenvold, M. (2024). Acceptability and usefulness of the EORTC ‘Write In three Symptoms/Problems’ (WISP): a brief open-ended instrument for symptom assessment in cancer patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 22(1), [28]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-024-02244-z

Vancouver

Rojas-Concha L, Arrarrás JI, Conroy T, Chalk T, Guberti M, Holzner B et al. Acceptability and usefulness of the EORTC ‘Write In three Symptoms/Problems’ (WISP): a brief open-ended instrument for symptom assessment in cancer patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2024;22(1). 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-024-02244-z

Author

Rojas-Concha, Leslye ; Arrarrás, Juan Ignacio ; Conroy, Thierry ; Chalk, Tara ; Guberti, Monica ; Holzner, Bernhard ; Husson, Olga ; Kuliś, Dagmara ; Shamieh, Omar ; Piccinin, Claire ; Puga, María José ; Rohde, Gudrun ; Groenvold, Mogens. / Acceptability and usefulness of the EORTC ‘Write In three Symptoms/Problems’ (WISP) : a brief open-ended instrument for symptom assessment in cancer patients. In: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2024 ; Vol. 22, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{40bcbb56250d4c85b7230c9d2cfcf284,
title = "Acceptability and usefulness of the EORTC {\textquoteleft}Write In three Symptoms/Problems{\textquoteright} (WISP): a brief open-ended instrument for symptom assessment in cancer patients",
abstract = "Background: The use of open-ended questions supplementing static questionnaires with closed questions may facilitate the recognition of symptoms and toxicities. The open-ended {\textquoteleft}Write In three Symptoms/Problems (WISP){\textquoteright} instrument permits patients to report additional symptoms/problems not covered by selected EORTC questionnaires. We evaluated the acceptability and usefulness of WISP with cancer patients receiving active and palliative care/treatment in Austria, Chile, France, Jordan, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain and the United Kingdom. Methods: We conducted a literature search on validated instruments for cancer patients including open-ended questions and analyzing their responses. WISP was translated into eight languages and pilot tested. WISP translations were pre-tested together with EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-C15-PAL and relevant modules, followed by patient interviews to evaluate their understanding about WISP. Proportions were used to summarize patient responses obtained from interviews and WISP. Results: From the seven instruments identified in the literature, only the free text collected from the PRO-CTAE has been analyzed previously. In our study, 161 cancer patients participated in the pre-testing and interviews (50% in active treatment). Qualitative interviews showed high acceptability of WISP. Among the 295 symptoms/problems reported using WISP, skin problems, sore mouth and bleeding were more prevalent in patients in active treatment, whereas numbness/tingling, dry mouth and existential problems were more prevalent in patients in palliative care/treatment. Conclusions: The EORTC WISP instrument was found to be acceptable and useful for symptom assessment in cancer patients. WISP improves the identification of symptoms/problems not assessed by cancer-generic questionnaires and therefore, we recommend its use alongside the EORTC questionnaires.",
keywords = "Acceptability, Cancer, Palliative care, Prevalence, Quality of Life, Symptom assessment",
author = "Leslye Rojas-Concha and Arrarr{\'a}s, {Juan Ignacio} and Thierry Conroy and Tara Chalk and Monica Guberti and Bernhard Holzner and Olga Husson and Dagmara Kuli{\'s} and Omar Shamieh and Claire Piccinin and Puga, {Mar{\'i}a Jos{\'e}} and Gudrun Rohde and Mogens Groenvold",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2024.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1186/s12955-024-02244-z",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
journal = "Health and Quality of Life Outcomes",
issn = "1477-7525",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acceptability and usefulness of the EORTC ‘Write In three Symptoms/Problems’ (WISP)

T2 - a brief open-ended instrument for symptom assessment in cancer patients

AU - Rojas-Concha, Leslye

AU - Arrarrás, Juan Ignacio

AU - Conroy, Thierry

AU - Chalk, Tara

AU - Guberti, Monica

AU - Holzner, Bernhard

AU - Husson, Olga

AU - Kuliś, Dagmara

AU - Shamieh, Omar

AU - Piccinin, Claire

AU - Puga, María José

AU - Rohde, Gudrun

AU - Groenvold, Mogens

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Background: The use of open-ended questions supplementing static questionnaires with closed questions may facilitate the recognition of symptoms and toxicities. The open-ended ‘Write In three Symptoms/Problems (WISP)’ instrument permits patients to report additional symptoms/problems not covered by selected EORTC questionnaires. We evaluated the acceptability and usefulness of WISP with cancer patients receiving active and palliative care/treatment in Austria, Chile, France, Jordan, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain and the United Kingdom. Methods: We conducted a literature search on validated instruments for cancer patients including open-ended questions and analyzing their responses. WISP was translated into eight languages and pilot tested. WISP translations were pre-tested together with EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-C15-PAL and relevant modules, followed by patient interviews to evaluate their understanding about WISP. Proportions were used to summarize patient responses obtained from interviews and WISP. Results: From the seven instruments identified in the literature, only the free text collected from the PRO-CTAE has been analyzed previously. In our study, 161 cancer patients participated in the pre-testing and interviews (50% in active treatment). Qualitative interviews showed high acceptability of WISP. Among the 295 symptoms/problems reported using WISP, skin problems, sore mouth and bleeding were more prevalent in patients in active treatment, whereas numbness/tingling, dry mouth and existential problems were more prevalent in patients in palliative care/treatment. Conclusions: The EORTC WISP instrument was found to be acceptable and useful for symptom assessment in cancer patients. WISP improves the identification of symptoms/problems not assessed by cancer-generic questionnaires and therefore, we recommend its use alongside the EORTC questionnaires.

AB - Background: The use of open-ended questions supplementing static questionnaires with closed questions may facilitate the recognition of symptoms and toxicities. The open-ended ‘Write In three Symptoms/Problems (WISP)’ instrument permits patients to report additional symptoms/problems not covered by selected EORTC questionnaires. We evaluated the acceptability and usefulness of WISP with cancer patients receiving active and palliative care/treatment in Austria, Chile, France, Jordan, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain and the United Kingdom. Methods: We conducted a literature search on validated instruments for cancer patients including open-ended questions and analyzing their responses. WISP was translated into eight languages and pilot tested. WISP translations were pre-tested together with EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-C15-PAL and relevant modules, followed by patient interviews to evaluate their understanding about WISP. Proportions were used to summarize patient responses obtained from interviews and WISP. Results: From the seven instruments identified in the literature, only the free text collected from the PRO-CTAE has been analyzed previously. In our study, 161 cancer patients participated in the pre-testing and interviews (50% in active treatment). Qualitative interviews showed high acceptability of WISP. Among the 295 symptoms/problems reported using WISP, skin problems, sore mouth and bleeding were more prevalent in patients in active treatment, whereas numbness/tingling, dry mouth and existential problems were more prevalent in patients in palliative care/treatment. Conclusions: The EORTC WISP instrument was found to be acceptable and useful for symptom assessment in cancer patients. WISP improves the identification of symptoms/problems not assessed by cancer-generic questionnaires and therefore, we recommend its use alongside the EORTC questionnaires.

KW - Acceptability

KW - Cancer

KW - Palliative care

KW - Prevalence

KW - Quality of Life

KW - Symptom assessment

U2 - 10.1186/s12955-024-02244-z

DO - 10.1186/s12955-024-02244-z

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38532393

AN - SCOPUS:85188575640

VL - 22

JO - Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

JF - Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

SN - 1477-7525

IS - 1

M1 - 28

ER -

ID: 387655966