Telemetric Continuous Glucose Monitoring During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Isolated Hospitalized Patients in Denmark: A Randomized Controlled Exploratory Trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Telemetric Continuous Glucose Monitoring During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Isolated Hospitalized Patients in Denmark : A Randomized Controlled Exploratory Trial. / Klarskov, Carina Kirstine; Windum, Nicole Avlund; Olsen, Mikkel Thor; Dungu, Arnold Matovu; Jensen, Andreas Kryger; Lindegaard, Birgitte; Pedersen-Bjergaard, Ulrik; Kristensen, Peter Lommer.

I: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, Bind 24, Nr. 2, 2022.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Klarskov, CK, Windum, NA, Olsen, MT, Dungu, AM, Jensen, AK, Lindegaard, B, Pedersen-Bjergaard, U & Kristensen, PL 2022, 'Telemetric Continuous Glucose Monitoring During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Isolated Hospitalized Patients in Denmark: A Randomized Controlled Exploratory Trial', Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, bind 24, nr. 2. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2021.0291

APA

Klarskov, C. K., Windum, N. A., Olsen, M. T., Dungu, A. M., Jensen, A. K., Lindegaard, B., Pedersen-Bjergaard, U., & Kristensen, P. L. (2022). Telemetric Continuous Glucose Monitoring During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Isolated Hospitalized Patients in Denmark: A Randomized Controlled Exploratory Trial. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2021.0291

Vancouver

Klarskov CK, Windum NA, Olsen MT, Dungu AM, Jensen AK, Lindegaard B o.a. Telemetric Continuous Glucose Monitoring During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Isolated Hospitalized Patients in Denmark: A Randomized Controlled Exploratory Trial. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. 2022;24(2). https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2021.0291

Author

Klarskov, Carina Kirstine ; Windum, Nicole Avlund ; Olsen, Mikkel Thor ; Dungu, Arnold Matovu ; Jensen, Andreas Kryger ; Lindegaard, Birgitte ; Pedersen-Bjergaard, Ulrik ; Kristensen, Peter Lommer. / Telemetric Continuous Glucose Monitoring During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Isolated Hospitalized Patients in Denmark : A Randomized Controlled Exploratory Trial. I: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. 2022 ; Bind 24, Nr. 2.

Bibtex

@article{661bed66a87b44508430b78062bbc429,
title = "Telemetric Continuous Glucose Monitoring During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Isolated Hospitalized Patients in Denmark: A Randomized Controlled Exploratory Trial",
abstract = "Objective: To investigate whether telemetric continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in hospitalized and isolated patients with diabetes mellitus and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with better glycemic outcomes and fewer patient health care worker contacts compared to blood glucose monitoring by traditional point-of-care (POC) glucose testing and to investigate the user aspect of implementing a CGM-system in-hospital.Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled exploratory trial was performed on hospitalized and isolated patients with diabetes and COVID-19 from May 2020 until February 2021 at Nordsj AE llands Hospital, Denmark. Participants were randomized to nonblinded telemetric CGM (as the only glucose monitoring method) or traditional POC glucose testing + blinded CGM. The primary endpoint was time in range (TIR) based on CGM data in both groups. A questionnaire about the user aspect of the CGM system was answered by health care personnel (HCP).Results: We included 64 participants in the analysis, 31 in the CGM group and 33 in the POC glucose group. TIR median was 46% for the CGM group and 68% for the POC glucose group (P = 0.368). The mean glucose value for the CGM group was 11.1 and 10.8 mmol/L in the POC glucose group (P = 0.372). CGM was associated with fewer POC glucose measurements (P < 0.001). Out of 30 HCPs, 28 preferred telemetric CGM over POC glucose testing.Conclusion: Remote glucose monitoring by CGM did not improve glycemic outcomes compared to traditional POC glucose testing, but was associated with fewer patient-personnel contacts, saving time for HCPs performing diabetes-related tasks. Most HCPs preferred CGM. The study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT04430608).",
keywords = "COVID-19, Diabetes mellitus, Continuous glucose monitoring, Isolation, Infection, Personal protective equipment, Telemetric medicine, HYPERGLYCEMIA",
author = "Klarskov, {Carina Kirstine} and Windum, {Nicole Avlund} and Olsen, {Mikkel Thor} and Dungu, {Arnold Matovu} and Jensen, {Andreas Kryger} and Birgitte Lindegaard and Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard and Kristensen, {Peter Lommer}",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1089/dia.2021.0291",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
journal = "Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics",
issn = "1520-9156",
publisher = "Mary AnnLiebert, Inc. Publishers",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Telemetric Continuous Glucose Monitoring During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Isolated Hospitalized Patients in Denmark

T2 - A Randomized Controlled Exploratory Trial

AU - Klarskov, Carina Kirstine

AU - Windum, Nicole Avlund

AU - Olsen, Mikkel Thor

AU - Dungu, Arnold Matovu

AU - Jensen, Andreas Kryger

AU - Lindegaard, Birgitte

AU - Pedersen-Bjergaard, Ulrik

AU - Kristensen, Peter Lommer

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Objective: To investigate whether telemetric continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in hospitalized and isolated patients with diabetes mellitus and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with better glycemic outcomes and fewer patient health care worker contacts compared to blood glucose monitoring by traditional point-of-care (POC) glucose testing and to investigate the user aspect of implementing a CGM-system in-hospital.Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled exploratory trial was performed on hospitalized and isolated patients with diabetes and COVID-19 from May 2020 until February 2021 at Nordsj AE llands Hospital, Denmark. Participants were randomized to nonblinded telemetric CGM (as the only glucose monitoring method) or traditional POC glucose testing + blinded CGM. The primary endpoint was time in range (TIR) based on CGM data in both groups. A questionnaire about the user aspect of the CGM system was answered by health care personnel (HCP).Results: We included 64 participants in the analysis, 31 in the CGM group and 33 in the POC glucose group. TIR median was 46% for the CGM group and 68% for the POC glucose group (P = 0.368). The mean glucose value for the CGM group was 11.1 and 10.8 mmol/L in the POC glucose group (P = 0.372). CGM was associated with fewer POC glucose measurements (P < 0.001). Out of 30 HCPs, 28 preferred telemetric CGM over POC glucose testing.Conclusion: Remote glucose monitoring by CGM did not improve glycemic outcomes compared to traditional POC glucose testing, but was associated with fewer patient-personnel contacts, saving time for HCPs performing diabetes-related tasks. Most HCPs preferred CGM. The study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT04430608).

AB - Objective: To investigate whether telemetric continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in hospitalized and isolated patients with diabetes mellitus and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with better glycemic outcomes and fewer patient health care worker contacts compared to blood glucose monitoring by traditional point-of-care (POC) glucose testing and to investigate the user aspect of implementing a CGM-system in-hospital.Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled exploratory trial was performed on hospitalized and isolated patients with diabetes and COVID-19 from May 2020 until February 2021 at Nordsj AE llands Hospital, Denmark. Participants were randomized to nonblinded telemetric CGM (as the only glucose monitoring method) or traditional POC glucose testing + blinded CGM. The primary endpoint was time in range (TIR) based on CGM data in both groups. A questionnaire about the user aspect of the CGM system was answered by health care personnel (HCP).Results: We included 64 participants in the analysis, 31 in the CGM group and 33 in the POC glucose group. TIR median was 46% for the CGM group and 68% for the POC glucose group (P = 0.368). The mean glucose value for the CGM group was 11.1 and 10.8 mmol/L in the POC glucose group (P = 0.372). CGM was associated with fewer POC glucose measurements (P < 0.001). Out of 30 HCPs, 28 preferred telemetric CGM over POC glucose testing.Conclusion: Remote glucose monitoring by CGM did not improve glycemic outcomes compared to traditional POC glucose testing, but was associated with fewer patient-personnel contacts, saving time for HCPs performing diabetes-related tasks. Most HCPs preferred CGM. The study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT04430608).

KW - COVID-19

KW - Diabetes mellitus

KW - Continuous glucose monitoring

KW - Isolation

KW - Infection

KW - Personal protective equipment

KW - Telemetric medicine

KW - HYPERGLYCEMIA

U2 - 10.1089/dia.2021.0291

DO - 10.1089/dia.2021.0291

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34524009

VL - 24

JO - Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

JF - Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

SN - 1520-9156

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 290043051