Statistical anxiety and attitudes towards statistics: Criterion-related construct validity of the HFS-R questionnaire revisited using Rasch models

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Statistical anxiety and attitudes towards statistics : Criterion-related construct validity of the HFS-R questionnaire revisited using Rasch models. / Nielsen, Tine; Kreiner, Svend.

I: Cogent Education, Bind 8, Nr. 1, 1947941, 2021.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Nielsen, T & Kreiner, S 2021, 'Statistical anxiety and attitudes towards statistics: Criterion-related construct validity of the HFS-R questionnaire revisited using Rasch models', Cogent Education, bind 8, nr. 1, 1947941. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1947941

APA

Nielsen, T., & Kreiner, S. (2021). Statistical anxiety and attitudes towards statistics: Criterion-related construct validity of the HFS-R questionnaire revisited using Rasch models. Cogent Education, 8(1), [1947941]. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1947941

Vancouver

Nielsen T, Kreiner S. Statistical anxiety and attitudes towards statistics: Criterion-related construct validity of the HFS-R questionnaire revisited using Rasch models. Cogent Education. 2021;8(1). 1947941. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1947941

Author

Nielsen, Tine ; Kreiner, Svend. / Statistical anxiety and attitudes towards statistics : Criterion-related construct validity of the HFS-R questionnaire revisited using Rasch models. I: Cogent Education. 2021 ; Bind 8, Nr. 1.

Bibtex

@article{83fc1de2a3f64adda17f309395050b6d,
title = "Statistical anxiety and attitudes towards statistics: Criterion-related construct validity of the HFS-R questionnaire revisited using Rasch models",
abstract = "In 2018, Nielsen and Kreiner provided evidence that the Attitudes and Relationship to Statistics—Revised (HFS-R) questionnaire provides essentially valid, objective, and reliable measurement of three statistical anxiety constructs and one statistical attitude construct among students of sociology and public health. The purpose of the study described in this paper was to revisit the HFS-R instrument to assess the degree to which the properties of the instrument and its subscales extends to students of psychology. The study confirmed that this was largely the case. HFS-R is again found to provide essentially valid, objective and reliable measures of a three-dimensional construct related to Statistical Anxiety and a unidimensional construct associated with attitudes towards statistics. This paper provides the documentation supporting these claims.",
keywords = "attitudes towards statistics, HFS-R, higher education, Rasch models, statistical anxiety",
author = "Tine Nielsen and Svend Kreiner",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1080/2331186X.2021.1947941",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Cogent Education",
issn = "2331-186X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statistical anxiety and attitudes towards statistics

T2 - Criterion-related construct validity of the HFS-R questionnaire revisited using Rasch models

AU - Nielsen, Tine

AU - Kreiner, Svend

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - In 2018, Nielsen and Kreiner provided evidence that the Attitudes and Relationship to Statistics—Revised (HFS-R) questionnaire provides essentially valid, objective, and reliable measurement of three statistical anxiety constructs and one statistical attitude construct among students of sociology and public health. The purpose of the study described in this paper was to revisit the HFS-R instrument to assess the degree to which the properties of the instrument and its subscales extends to students of psychology. The study confirmed that this was largely the case. HFS-R is again found to provide essentially valid, objective and reliable measures of a three-dimensional construct related to Statistical Anxiety and a unidimensional construct associated with attitudes towards statistics. This paper provides the documentation supporting these claims.

AB - In 2018, Nielsen and Kreiner provided evidence that the Attitudes and Relationship to Statistics—Revised (HFS-R) questionnaire provides essentially valid, objective, and reliable measurement of three statistical anxiety constructs and one statistical attitude construct among students of sociology and public health. The purpose of the study described in this paper was to revisit the HFS-R instrument to assess the degree to which the properties of the instrument and its subscales extends to students of psychology. The study confirmed that this was largely the case. HFS-R is again found to provide essentially valid, objective and reliable measures of a three-dimensional construct related to Statistical Anxiety and a unidimensional construct associated with attitudes towards statistics. This paper provides the documentation supporting these claims.

KW - attitudes towards statistics

KW - HFS-R

KW - higher education

KW - Rasch models

KW - statistical anxiety

U2 - 10.1080/2331186X.2021.1947941

DO - 10.1080/2331186X.2021.1947941

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85110823622

VL - 8

JO - Cogent Education

JF - Cogent Education

SN - 2331-186X

IS - 1

M1 - 1947941

ER -

ID: 286631154