Reproducibility and validity of simple questions to identify urinary incontinence in elderly women
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Reproducibility and validity of simple questions to identify urinary incontinence in elderly women. / Rohr, Gitte; Christensen, Kaare; Ulstrup, Kirsten; Kragstrup, Jakob.
I: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Bind 83, Nr. 10, 10.2004, s. 969-972.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Reproducibility and validity of simple questions to identify urinary incontinence in elderly women
AU - Rohr, Gitte
AU - Christensen, Kaare
AU - Ulstrup, Kirsten
AU - Kragstrup, Jakob
PY - 2004/10
Y1 - 2004/10
N2 - Background. Epidemiologic studies are dependent on simple and valid questions to assess the prevalence and type of urinary incontinence. Objective. To examine the reproducibility and validity of two standardized questions seeking to identify stress and urge incontinence among elderly women. Methods. A random sample of 421 women 75 years or older living in the center of Odense, Denmark, were invited to participate, and 223 (53%) accepted a first interview in their home. A sample of 154 women were selected for a second interview with the same questions [accepted by 144 (94%)]. The second visit also included a long open interview about incontinence and was followed by a prospective registration of leakages. Results. In the first interview 39% (95% confidence interval (CI) 34-47%) of the elderly women reported incontinence. The reliability of the questions was acceptable [kappa of 0.81 (95% CI 0.34-0.89)] with percent agreement of 90% (95% CI 84-95%) between first and second interviews for all incontinence (stress and/or urge). When the open interview was used as a "gold standard," the questions showed acceptable validity: a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI 0.86-0.96) and a specificity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.92) for all incontinence. Conclusion. Standardized questions about incontinence give reproducible answers and produce information that is comparable to a long open interview.
AB - Background. Epidemiologic studies are dependent on simple and valid questions to assess the prevalence and type of urinary incontinence. Objective. To examine the reproducibility and validity of two standardized questions seeking to identify stress and urge incontinence among elderly women. Methods. A random sample of 421 women 75 years or older living in the center of Odense, Denmark, were invited to participate, and 223 (53%) accepted a first interview in their home. A sample of 154 women were selected for a second interview with the same questions [accepted by 144 (94%)]. The second visit also included a long open interview about incontinence and was followed by a prospective registration of leakages. Results. In the first interview 39% (95% confidence interval (CI) 34-47%) of the elderly women reported incontinence. The reliability of the questions was acceptable [kappa of 0.81 (95% CI 0.34-0.89)] with percent agreement of 90% (95% CI 84-95%) between first and second interviews for all incontinence (stress and/or urge). When the open interview was used as a "gold standard," the questions showed acceptable validity: a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI 0.86-0.96) and a specificity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.92) for all incontinence. Conclusion. Standardized questions about incontinence give reproducible answers and produce information that is comparable to a long open interview.
KW - Elderly women
KW - Questionnaire
KW - Urinary incontinence
KW - Validation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4944251095&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00557.x
DO - 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00557.x
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 15453896
AN - SCOPUS:4944251095
VL - 83
SP - 969
EP - 972
JO - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
JF - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
SN - 0001-6349
IS - 10
ER -
ID: 324171891