Medication-related experiences of patients with polypharmacy: a systematic review of qualitative studies

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Medication-related experiences of patients with polypharmacy : a systematic review of qualitative studies. / Eriksen, Christian Ulrich; Kyriakidis, Stavros; Christensen, Line Due; Jacobsen, Ramune; Laursen, Jannie; Christensen, Mikkel Bring; Frølich, Anne.

I: BMJ Open, Bind 10, Nr. 9, e036158, 06.09.2020.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Eriksen, CU, Kyriakidis, S, Christensen, LD, Jacobsen, R, Laursen, J, Christensen, MB & Frølich, A 2020, 'Medication-related experiences of patients with polypharmacy: a systematic review of qualitative studies', BMJ Open, bind 10, nr. 9, e036158. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036158

APA

Eriksen, C. U., Kyriakidis, S., Christensen, L. D., Jacobsen, R., Laursen, J., Christensen, M. B., & Frølich, A. (2020). Medication-related experiences of patients with polypharmacy: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMJ Open, 10(9), [e036158]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036158

Vancouver

Eriksen CU, Kyriakidis S, Christensen LD, Jacobsen R, Laursen J, Christensen MB o.a. Medication-related experiences of patients with polypharmacy: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMJ Open. 2020 sep. 6;10(9). e036158. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036158

Author

Eriksen, Christian Ulrich ; Kyriakidis, Stavros ; Christensen, Line Due ; Jacobsen, Ramune ; Laursen, Jannie ; Christensen, Mikkel Bring ; Frølich, Anne. / Medication-related experiences of patients with polypharmacy : a systematic review of qualitative studies. I: BMJ Open. 2020 ; Bind 10, Nr. 9.

Bibtex

@article{5201af2d33db4663bcbc04d9747da785,
title = "Medication-related experiences of patients with polypharmacy: a systematic review of qualitative studies",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: We aimed to synthesise qualitative studies exploring medication-related experiences of polypharmacy among patients with multimorbidity.METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature in February 2020 for primary, peer-reviewed qualitative studies about multimorbid patients' medication-related experiences with polypharmacy, defined as the use of four or more medications. Identified studies were appraised for methodological quality by applying the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research, and data were extracted and synthesised by the meta-aggregation approach.RESULTS: We included 13 qualitative studies, representing 499 patients with polypharmacy and a wide range of chronic conditions. Overall, most Critical Appraisal Skills Programme items were reported in the studies. We extracted 140 findings, synthesised these into 17 categories, and developed five interrelated syntheses: (1) patients with polypharmacy are a heterogeneous group in terms of needing and appraising medication information; (2) patients are aware of the importance of medication adherence, but it is difficult to achieve; (3) decision-making about medications is complex; (4) multiple relational factors affect communication between patients and physicians, and these factors can prevent patients from disclosing important information; and (5) polypharmacy affects patients' lives and self-perception, and challenges with polypharmacy are not limited to practical issues of medication-taking.DISCUSSION: Polypharmacy poses many challenges to patients, which have a negative impact on quality of life and adherence. Thus, when dealing with polypharmacy patients, it is crucial that healthcare professionals actively solicit individual patients' perspectives on challenges related to polypharmacy. Based on the reported experiences, we recommend that healthcare professionals upscale communicative efforts and involve patients' social network on an individualised basis to facilitate shared decision-making and treatment adherence in multimorbidpatients with polypharmacy.",
author = "Eriksen, {Christian Ulrich} and Stavros Kyriakidis and Christensen, {Line Due} and Ramune Jacobsen and Jannie Laursen and Christensen, {Mikkel Bring} and Anne Fr{\o}lich",
note = "{\textcopyright} Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.",
year = "2020",
month = sep,
day = "6",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036158",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medication-related experiences of patients with polypharmacy

T2 - a systematic review of qualitative studies

AU - Eriksen, Christian Ulrich

AU - Kyriakidis, Stavros

AU - Christensen, Line Due

AU - Jacobsen, Ramune

AU - Laursen, Jannie

AU - Christensen, Mikkel Bring

AU - Frølich, Anne

N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

PY - 2020/9/6

Y1 - 2020/9/6

N2 - BACKGROUND: We aimed to synthesise qualitative studies exploring medication-related experiences of polypharmacy among patients with multimorbidity.METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature in February 2020 for primary, peer-reviewed qualitative studies about multimorbid patients' medication-related experiences with polypharmacy, defined as the use of four or more medications. Identified studies were appraised for methodological quality by applying the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research, and data were extracted and synthesised by the meta-aggregation approach.RESULTS: We included 13 qualitative studies, representing 499 patients with polypharmacy and a wide range of chronic conditions. Overall, most Critical Appraisal Skills Programme items were reported in the studies. We extracted 140 findings, synthesised these into 17 categories, and developed five interrelated syntheses: (1) patients with polypharmacy are a heterogeneous group in terms of needing and appraising medication information; (2) patients are aware of the importance of medication adherence, but it is difficult to achieve; (3) decision-making about medications is complex; (4) multiple relational factors affect communication between patients and physicians, and these factors can prevent patients from disclosing important information; and (5) polypharmacy affects patients' lives and self-perception, and challenges with polypharmacy are not limited to practical issues of medication-taking.DISCUSSION: Polypharmacy poses many challenges to patients, which have a negative impact on quality of life and adherence. Thus, when dealing with polypharmacy patients, it is crucial that healthcare professionals actively solicit individual patients' perspectives on challenges related to polypharmacy. Based on the reported experiences, we recommend that healthcare professionals upscale communicative efforts and involve patients' social network on an individualised basis to facilitate shared decision-making and treatment adherence in multimorbidpatients with polypharmacy.

AB - BACKGROUND: We aimed to synthesise qualitative studies exploring medication-related experiences of polypharmacy among patients with multimorbidity.METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature in February 2020 for primary, peer-reviewed qualitative studies about multimorbid patients' medication-related experiences with polypharmacy, defined as the use of four or more medications. Identified studies were appraised for methodological quality by applying the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research, and data were extracted and synthesised by the meta-aggregation approach.RESULTS: We included 13 qualitative studies, representing 499 patients with polypharmacy and a wide range of chronic conditions. Overall, most Critical Appraisal Skills Programme items were reported in the studies. We extracted 140 findings, synthesised these into 17 categories, and developed five interrelated syntheses: (1) patients with polypharmacy are a heterogeneous group in terms of needing and appraising medication information; (2) patients are aware of the importance of medication adherence, but it is difficult to achieve; (3) decision-making about medications is complex; (4) multiple relational factors affect communication between patients and physicians, and these factors can prevent patients from disclosing important information; and (5) polypharmacy affects patients' lives and self-perception, and challenges with polypharmacy are not limited to practical issues of medication-taking.DISCUSSION: Polypharmacy poses many challenges to patients, which have a negative impact on quality of life and adherence. Thus, when dealing with polypharmacy patients, it is crucial that healthcare professionals actively solicit individual patients' perspectives on challenges related to polypharmacy. Based on the reported experiences, we recommend that healthcare professionals upscale communicative efforts and involve patients' social network on an individualised basis to facilitate shared decision-making and treatment adherence in multimorbidpatients with polypharmacy.

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036158

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036158

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32895268

VL - 10

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 9

M1 - e036158

ER -

ID: 248545816