Is mammography screening history a predictor of future breast cancer risk?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Is mammography screening history a predictor of future breast cancer risk? / Andersen, Sune Bangsbøll; Törnberg, Sven; Kilpeläinen, Sini; Von Euler-Chelpin, My; Njor, Sisse Helle.

I: European Journal of Epidemiology, Bind 30, Nr. 2, 2015, s. 143-149.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Andersen, SB, Törnberg, S, Kilpeläinen, S, Von Euler-Chelpin, M & Njor, SH 2015, 'Is mammography screening history a predictor of future breast cancer risk?', European Journal of Epidemiology, bind 30, nr. 2, s. 143-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-014-9972-6

APA

Andersen, S. B., Törnberg, S., Kilpeläinen, S., Von Euler-Chelpin, M., & Njor, S. H. (2015). Is mammography screening history a predictor of future breast cancer risk? European Journal of Epidemiology, 30(2), 143-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-014-9972-6

Vancouver

Andersen SB, Törnberg S, Kilpeläinen S, Von Euler-Chelpin M, Njor SH. Is mammography screening history a predictor of future breast cancer risk? European Journal of Epidemiology. 2015;30(2):143-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-014-9972-6

Author

Andersen, Sune Bangsbøll ; Törnberg, Sven ; Kilpeläinen, Sini ; Von Euler-Chelpin, My ; Njor, Sisse Helle. / Is mammography screening history a predictor of future breast cancer risk?. I: European Journal of Epidemiology. 2015 ; Bind 30, Nr. 2. s. 143-149.

Bibtex

@article{f0779cc90b2d4389b697bc72701ac21d,
title = "Is mammography screening history a predictor of future breast cancer risk?",
abstract = "Inspired by the model by Walter and Day for risk of cervical cancer following negative screens, one might hypothesize that women in a mammography screening programme with a certain number of negative screens had a lower remaining breast cancer risk than that of women in general. We studied whether number of negative screens was a predictor for a low remaining breast cancer risk in women participating in the mammography screening programmes in Stockholm, Copenhagen and Funen. Data were collected from the mammography screening programmes in Stockholm, Sweden (1989-2012), Copenhagen, Denmark (1991-2009) and Funen, Denmark (1993-2009), and linked to the respective cancer registries. We calculated cumulative hazard rates for breast cancer in women in cohorts defined by age at entry and number of negative screens for the maximum follow-up period in each screening centre. For all centres and cohorts, the cumulative hazard were parallel for all number of negative screens, from after the time, when the women were scheduled to be invited for the next screen. This means that the remaining breast cancer risk is similar no matter how many negative screens a woman have had. Number of negative screens was not a predictor of a low remaining breast cancer risk in women participating in the mammography screening programmes in Stockholm, Sweden, Copenhagen and Funen, Denmark. The history of previous negative screens is therefore not suitable for personalisation of mammography screening.",
author = "Andersen, {Sune Bangsb{\o}ll} and Sven T{\"o}rnberg and Sini Kilpel{\"a}inen and {Von Euler-Chelpin}, My and Njor, {Sisse Helle}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s10654-014-9972-6",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "143--149",
journal = "European Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0393-2990",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is mammography screening history a predictor of future breast cancer risk?

AU - Andersen, Sune Bangsbøll

AU - Törnberg, Sven

AU - Kilpeläinen, Sini

AU - Von Euler-Chelpin, My

AU - Njor, Sisse Helle

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Inspired by the model by Walter and Day for risk of cervical cancer following negative screens, one might hypothesize that women in a mammography screening programme with a certain number of negative screens had a lower remaining breast cancer risk than that of women in general. We studied whether number of negative screens was a predictor for a low remaining breast cancer risk in women participating in the mammography screening programmes in Stockholm, Copenhagen and Funen. Data were collected from the mammography screening programmes in Stockholm, Sweden (1989-2012), Copenhagen, Denmark (1991-2009) and Funen, Denmark (1993-2009), and linked to the respective cancer registries. We calculated cumulative hazard rates for breast cancer in women in cohorts defined by age at entry and number of negative screens for the maximum follow-up period in each screening centre. For all centres and cohorts, the cumulative hazard were parallel for all number of negative screens, from after the time, when the women were scheduled to be invited for the next screen. This means that the remaining breast cancer risk is similar no matter how many negative screens a woman have had. Number of negative screens was not a predictor of a low remaining breast cancer risk in women participating in the mammography screening programmes in Stockholm, Sweden, Copenhagen and Funen, Denmark. The history of previous negative screens is therefore not suitable for personalisation of mammography screening.

AB - Inspired by the model by Walter and Day for risk of cervical cancer following negative screens, one might hypothesize that women in a mammography screening programme with a certain number of negative screens had a lower remaining breast cancer risk than that of women in general. We studied whether number of negative screens was a predictor for a low remaining breast cancer risk in women participating in the mammography screening programmes in Stockholm, Copenhagen and Funen. Data were collected from the mammography screening programmes in Stockholm, Sweden (1989-2012), Copenhagen, Denmark (1991-2009) and Funen, Denmark (1993-2009), and linked to the respective cancer registries. We calculated cumulative hazard rates for breast cancer in women in cohorts defined by age at entry and number of negative screens for the maximum follow-up period in each screening centre. For all centres and cohorts, the cumulative hazard were parallel for all number of negative screens, from after the time, when the women were scheduled to be invited for the next screen. This means that the remaining breast cancer risk is similar no matter how many negative screens a woman have had. Number of negative screens was not a predictor of a low remaining breast cancer risk in women participating in the mammography screening programmes in Stockholm, Sweden, Copenhagen and Funen, Denmark. The history of previous negative screens is therefore not suitable for personalisation of mammography screening.

U2 - 10.1007/s10654-014-9972-6

DO - 10.1007/s10654-014-9972-6

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25421784

VL - 30

SP - 143

EP - 149

JO - European Journal of Epidemiology

JF - European Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0393-2990

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 138178712