“In some clinics, they said it's elective, and then they would refuse”: A Mixed-Methods Study on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to abortion services in Germany

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

“In some clinics, they said it's elective, and then they would refuse” : A Mixed-Methods Study on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to abortion services in Germany. / Rød, Helene; Gomperts, Rebecca; Atay, Hazal; Tersbøl, Britt Pinkowski.

I: Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, Bind 36, 100854, 2023.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Rød, H, Gomperts, R, Atay, H & Tersbøl, BP 2023, '“In some clinics, they said it's elective, and then they would refuse”: A Mixed-Methods Study on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to abortion services in Germany', Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, bind 36, 100854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100854

APA

Rød, H., Gomperts, R., Atay, H., & Tersbøl, B. P. (2023). “In some clinics, they said it's elective, and then they would refuse”: A Mixed-Methods Study on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to abortion services in Germany. Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, 36, [100854]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100854

Vancouver

Rød H, Gomperts R, Atay H, Tersbøl BP. “In some clinics, they said it's elective, and then they would refuse”: A Mixed-Methods Study on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to abortion services in Germany. Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. 2023;36. 100854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100854

Author

Rød, Helene ; Gomperts, Rebecca ; Atay, Hazal ; Tersbøl, Britt Pinkowski. / “In some clinics, they said it's elective, and then they would refuse” : A Mixed-Methods Study on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to abortion services in Germany. I: Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. 2023 ; Bind 36.

Bibtex

@article{b478a7853236444e9a65e3569f4aca98,
title = "“In some clinics, they said it's elective, and then they would refuse”: A Mixed-Methods Study on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to abortion services in Germany",
abstract = "Objective: The World Health Organization recognizes abortion as essential health care and has encouraged governments to ensure access to abortion services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the threat of infection combined with government responses to COVID-19 have impacted access to abortion services globally. This study explores access to abortion in Germany during the pandemic. Methods: This study used a mixed-methods design. An analysis of data collected by Women on Web (WoW) was carried out to assess women's reasons for choosing telemedicine abortion outside the formal health system in Germany during the pandemic. Descriptive statistics were generated for 2057 requests for telemedicine abortion received by WoW between March 2020-March 2021. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight healthcare professionals involved in the provision of abortion services to explore how they perceive of women's access to abortion services in Germany during the pandemic. Results: The quantitative analysis found that preferences and needs for privacy (47.3%), secrecy (44.4%) and comfort (43.9%) were the most common reasons for choosing telemedicine abortion. COVID-19 was another important reason (38.8%). The thematic analysis of the interviews was organized into two overarching themes: service provision, and axes of difference. Conclusions: The pandemic affected the provision of abortion services as well as the circumstances of women seeking abortion. The main barriers to access were financial constraints, privacy issues, and lack of abortion providers. Throughout the pandemic, accessing abortion services was more difficult for many women in Germany, especially women experiencing multiple and overlapping forms of discrimination.",
keywords = "Abortion, Abortion access, Barriers to access, Germany, Health policies, Telemedicine abortion",
author = "Helene R{\o}d and Rebecca Gomperts and Hazal Atay and Tersb{\o}l, {Britt Pinkowski}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Authors",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100854",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
journal = "Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare",
issn = "1877-5756",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - “In some clinics, they said it's elective, and then they would refuse”

T2 - A Mixed-Methods Study on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to abortion services in Germany

AU - Rød, Helene

AU - Gomperts, Rebecca

AU - Atay, Hazal

AU - Tersbøl, Britt Pinkowski

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Objective: The World Health Organization recognizes abortion as essential health care and has encouraged governments to ensure access to abortion services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the threat of infection combined with government responses to COVID-19 have impacted access to abortion services globally. This study explores access to abortion in Germany during the pandemic. Methods: This study used a mixed-methods design. An analysis of data collected by Women on Web (WoW) was carried out to assess women's reasons for choosing telemedicine abortion outside the formal health system in Germany during the pandemic. Descriptive statistics were generated for 2057 requests for telemedicine abortion received by WoW between March 2020-March 2021. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight healthcare professionals involved in the provision of abortion services to explore how they perceive of women's access to abortion services in Germany during the pandemic. Results: The quantitative analysis found that preferences and needs for privacy (47.3%), secrecy (44.4%) and comfort (43.9%) were the most common reasons for choosing telemedicine abortion. COVID-19 was another important reason (38.8%). The thematic analysis of the interviews was organized into two overarching themes: service provision, and axes of difference. Conclusions: The pandemic affected the provision of abortion services as well as the circumstances of women seeking abortion. The main barriers to access were financial constraints, privacy issues, and lack of abortion providers. Throughout the pandemic, accessing abortion services was more difficult for many women in Germany, especially women experiencing multiple and overlapping forms of discrimination.

AB - Objective: The World Health Organization recognizes abortion as essential health care and has encouraged governments to ensure access to abortion services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the threat of infection combined with government responses to COVID-19 have impacted access to abortion services globally. This study explores access to abortion in Germany during the pandemic. Methods: This study used a mixed-methods design. An analysis of data collected by Women on Web (WoW) was carried out to assess women's reasons for choosing telemedicine abortion outside the formal health system in Germany during the pandemic. Descriptive statistics were generated for 2057 requests for telemedicine abortion received by WoW between March 2020-March 2021. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight healthcare professionals involved in the provision of abortion services to explore how they perceive of women's access to abortion services in Germany during the pandemic. Results: The quantitative analysis found that preferences and needs for privacy (47.3%), secrecy (44.4%) and comfort (43.9%) were the most common reasons for choosing telemedicine abortion. COVID-19 was another important reason (38.8%). The thematic analysis of the interviews was organized into two overarching themes: service provision, and axes of difference. Conclusions: The pandemic affected the provision of abortion services as well as the circumstances of women seeking abortion. The main barriers to access were financial constraints, privacy issues, and lack of abortion providers. Throughout the pandemic, accessing abortion services was more difficult for many women in Germany, especially women experiencing multiple and overlapping forms of discrimination.

KW - Abortion

KW - Abortion access

KW - Barriers to access

KW - Germany

KW - Health policies

KW - Telemedicine abortion

U2 - 10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100854

DO - 10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100854

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37207395

AN - SCOPUS:85159586480

VL - 36

JO - Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare

JF - Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare

SN - 1877-5756

M1 - 100854

ER -

ID: 357263808