Hvad siger Bourdieu og Foucault om dyrkelse af sundhedskroppen? Komparation mellem sociologiske og socialfilosofiske positioner

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Hvad siger Bourdieu og Foucault om dyrkelse af sundhedskroppen? Komparation mellem sociologiske og socialfilosofiske positioner. / Larsen, Kristian; Hindhede, Anette Lykke.

I: Praktiske Grunde: Nordisk tidsskrift for kultur- og samfundsvidenskab, Bind 3-4, 2020, s. 49-68.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Larsen, K & Hindhede, AL 2020, 'Hvad siger Bourdieu og Foucault om dyrkelse af sundhedskroppen? Komparation mellem sociologiske og socialfilosofiske positioner', Praktiske Grunde: Nordisk tidsskrift for kultur- og samfundsvidenskab, bind 3-4, s. 49-68. <http://www.praktiskegrunde.dk/2020/praktiskegrunde(2020-3+4z)samlet.pdf>

APA

Larsen, K., & Hindhede, A. L. (2020). Hvad siger Bourdieu og Foucault om dyrkelse af sundhedskroppen? Komparation mellem sociologiske og socialfilosofiske positioner. Praktiske Grunde: Nordisk tidsskrift for kultur- og samfundsvidenskab, 3-4, 49-68. http://www.praktiskegrunde.dk/2020/praktiskegrunde(2020-3+4z)samlet.pdf

Vancouver

Larsen K, Hindhede AL. Hvad siger Bourdieu og Foucault om dyrkelse af sundhedskroppen? Komparation mellem sociologiske og socialfilosofiske positioner. Praktiske Grunde: Nordisk tidsskrift for kultur- og samfundsvidenskab. 2020;3-4:49-68.

Author

Larsen, Kristian ; Hindhede, Anette Lykke. / Hvad siger Bourdieu og Foucault om dyrkelse af sundhedskroppen? Komparation mellem sociologiske og socialfilosofiske positioner. I: Praktiske Grunde: Nordisk tidsskrift for kultur- og samfundsvidenskab. 2020 ; Bind 3-4. s. 49-68.

Bibtex

@article{1814283d72ec448986fed819557e87fd,
title = "Hvad siger Bourdieu og Foucault om dyrkelse af sundhedskroppen?: Komparation mellem sociologiske og socialfilosofiske positioner",
abstract = "In this article, we outline ways of thinking and concepts that addresses the new health regime. We take as an onset Bourdieu{\textquoteright}s writings on the socialized body and lifestyles. We then review studies inspired by the French philosopher Michel Foucault{\textquoteright} thinking about bodies and his concepts of biopolitics and governmentality. Focus will be on the work by Nikolas Rose and his thinking about the will to health and identity. Subsequently, we discuss the similaritiesand differences between the two positions. We argue that common to these ways of thinking is that we must understand bodies as created and creating. However, while the social philosophers show overall and general transformations of societies and bodies, Bourdieu{\textquoteright}s relational position adds to this description by offering empirical sensitivity to social reproductions, distinctions and heterogeneous health- and body strategies.",
author = "Kristian Larsen and Hindhede, {Anette Lykke}",
year = "2020",
language = "Dansk",
volume = "3-4",
pages = "49--68",
journal = "Praktiske Grunde: Nordisk tidsskrift for kultur- og samfundsvidenskab",
issn = "1902-2271",
publisher = "Hexis - Nordisk forum for kultur- og samfundsvidenskab",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hvad siger Bourdieu og Foucault om dyrkelse af sundhedskroppen?

T2 - Komparation mellem sociologiske og socialfilosofiske positioner

AU - Larsen, Kristian

AU - Hindhede, Anette Lykke

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - In this article, we outline ways of thinking and concepts that addresses the new health regime. We take as an onset Bourdieu’s writings on the socialized body and lifestyles. We then review studies inspired by the French philosopher Michel Foucault’ thinking about bodies and his concepts of biopolitics and governmentality. Focus will be on the work by Nikolas Rose and his thinking about the will to health and identity. Subsequently, we discuss the similaritiesand differences between the two positions. We argue that common to these ways of thinking is that we must understand bodies as created and creating. However, while the social philosophers show overall and general transformations of societies and bodies, Bourdieu’s relational position adds to this description by offering empirical sensitivity to social reproductions, distinctions and heterogeneous health- and body strategies.

AB - In this article, we outline ways of thinking and concepts that addresses the new health regime. We take as an onset Bourdieu’s writings on the socialized body and lifestyles. We then review studies inspired by the French philosopher Michel Foucault’ thinking about bodies and his concepts of biopolitics and governmentality. Focus will be on the work by Nikolas Rose and his thinking about the will to health and identity. Subsequently, we discuss the similaritiesand differences between the two positions. We argue that common to these ways of thinking is that we must understand bodies as created and creating. However, while the social philosophers show overall and general transformations of societies and bodies, Bourdieu’s relational position adds to this description by offering empirical sensitivity to social reproductions, distinctions and heterogeneous health- and body strategies.

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 3-4

SP - 49

EP - 68

JO - Praktiske Grunde: Nordisk tidsskrift for kultur- og samfundsvidenskab

JF - Praktiske Grunde: Nordisk tidsskrift for kultur- og samfundsvidenskab

SN - 1902-2271

ER -

ID: 317083343