Health app policy: international comparison of nine countries' approaches

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Health app policy : international comparison of nine countries' approaches. / Essen, Anna; Stern, Ariel D.; Haase, Christoffer Bjerre; Car, Josip; Greaves, Felix; Paparova, Dragana; Vandeput, Steven; Wehrens, Rik; Bates, David W.

I: npj Digital Medicine, Bind 5, Nr. 1, 31, 2022.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Essen, A, Stern, AD, Haase, CB, Car, J, Greaves, F, Paparova, D, Vandeput, S, Wehrens, R & Bates, DW 2022, 'Health app policy: international comparison of nine countries' approaches', npj Digital Medicine, bind 5, nr. 1, 31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00573-1

APA

Essen, A., Stern, A. D., Haase, C. B., Car, J., Greaves, F., Paparova, D., Vandeput, S., Wehrens, R., & Bates, D. W. (2022). Health app policy: international comparison of nine countries' approaches. npj Digital Medicine, 5(1), [31]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00573-1

Vancouver

Essen A, Stern AD, Haase CB, Car J, Greaves F, Paparova D o.a. Health app policy: international comparison of nine countries' approaches. npj Digital Medicine. 2022;5(1). 31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00573-1

Author

Essen, Anna ; Stern, Ariel D. ; Haase, Christoffer Bjerre ; Car, Josip ; Greaves, Felix ; Paparova, Dragana ; Vandeput, Steven ; Wehrens, Rik ; Bates, David W. / Health app policy : international comparison of nine countries' approaches. I: npj Digital Medicine. 2022 ; Bind 5, Nr. 1.

Bibtex

@article{c1da99d0f46341d799b9c14e74cc72c3,
title = "Health app policy: international comparison of nine countries' approaches",
abstract = "An abundant and growing supply of digital health applications (apps) exists in the commercial tech-sector, which can be bewildering for clinicians, patients, and payers. A growing challenge for the health care system is therefore to facilitate the identification of safe and effective apps for health care practitioners and patients to generate the most health benefit as well as guide payer coverage decisions. Nearly all developed countries are attempting to define policy frameworks to improve decision-making, patient care, and health outcomes in this context. This study compares the national policy approaches currently in development/use for health apps in nine countries. We used secondary data, combined with a detailed review of policy and regulatory documents, and interviews with key individuals and experts in the field of digital health policy to collect data about implemented and planned policies and initiatives. We found that most approaches aim for centralized pipelines for health app approvals, although some countries are adding decentralized elements. While the countries studied are taking diverse paths, there is nevertheless broad, international convergence in terms of requirements in the areas of transparency, health content, interoperability, and privacy and security. The sheer number of apps on the market in most countries represents a challenge for clinicians and patients. Our analyses of the relevant policies identified challenges in areas such as reimbursement, safety, and privacy and suggest that more regulatory work is needed in the areas of operationalization, implementation and international transferability of approvals. Cross-national efforts are needed around regulation and for countries to realize the benefits of these technologies.",
author = "Anna Essen and Stern, {Ariel D.} and Haase, {Christoffer Bjerre} and Josip Car and Felix Greaves and Dragana Paparova and Steven Vandeput and Rik Wehrens and Bates, {David W.}",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1038/s41746-022-00573-1",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "Nature PJ Digital Medicine",
issn = "2398-6352",
publisher = "Nature Research",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health app policy

T2 - international comparison of nine countries' approaches

AU - Essen, Anna

AU - Stern, Ariel D.

AU - Haase, Christoffer Bjerre

AU - Car, Josip

AU - Greaves, Felix

AU - Paparova, Dragana

AU - Vandeput, Steven

AU - Wehrens, Rik

AU - Bates, David W.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - An abundant and growing supply of digital health applications (apps) exists in the commercial tech-sector, which can be bewildering for clinicians, patients, and payers. A growing challenge for the health care system is therefore to facilitate the identification of safe and effective apps for health care practitioners and patients to generate the most health benefit as well as guide payer coverage decisions. Nearly all developed countries are attempting to define policy frameworks to improve decision-making, patient care, and health outcomes in this context. This study compares the national policy approaches currently in development/use for health apps in nine countries. We used secondary data, combined with a detailed review of policy and regulatory documents, and interviews with key individuals and experts in the field of digital health policy to collect data about implemented and planned policies and initiatives. We found that most approaches aim for centralized pipelines for health app approvals, although some countries are adding decentralized elements. While the countries studied are taking diverse paths, there is nevertheless broad, international convergence in terms of requirements in the areas of transparency, health content, interoperability, and privacy and security. The sheer number of apps on the market in most countries represents a challenge for clinicians and patients. Our analyses of the relevant policies identified challenges in areas such as reimbursement, safety, and privacy and suggest that more regulatory work is needed in the areas of operationalization, implementation and international transferability of approvals. Cross-national efforts are needed around regulation and for countries to realize the benefits of these technologies.

AB - An abundant and growing supply of digital health applications (apps) exists in the commercial tech-sector, which can be bewildering for clinicians, patients, and payers. A growing challenge for the health care system is therefore to facilitate the identification of safe and effective apps for health care practitioners and patients to generate the most health benefit as well as guide payer coverage decisions. Nearly all developed countries are attempting to define policy frameworks to improve decision-making, patient care, and health outcomes in this context. This study compares the national policy approaches currently in development/use for health apps in nine countries. We used secondary data, combined with a detailed review of policy and regulatory documents, and interviews with key individuals and experts in the field of digital health policy to collect data about implemented and planned policies and initiatives. We found that most approaches aim for centralized pipelines for health app approvals, although some countries are adding decentralized elements. While the countries studied are taking diverse paths, there is nevertheless broad, international convergence in terms of requirements in the areas of transparency, health content, interoperability, and privacy and security. The sheer number of apps on the market in most countries represents a challenge for clinicians and patients. Our analyses of the relevant policies identified challenges in areas such as reimbursement, safety, and privacy and suggest that more regulatory work is needed in the areas of operationalization, implementation and international transferability of approvals. Cross-national efforts are needed around regulation and for countries to realize the benefits of these technologies.

U2 - 10.1038/s41746-022-00573-1

DO - 10.1038/s41746-022-00573-1

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35304561

VL - 5

JO - Nature PJ Digital Medicine

JF - Nature PJ Digital Medicine

SN - 2398-6352

IS - 1

M1 - 31

ER -

ID: 301624909