Content validity and reliability of the Copenhagen social relations questionnaire

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Content validity and reliability of the Copenhagen social relations questionnaire. / Lund, Rikke; Nielsen, Lene Snabe; Henriksen, Pia Wichmann; Schmidt, Lone; Avlund, Kirsten; Christensen, Ulla.

I: Journal of Aging and Health, Bind 26, Nr. 1, 02.2014, s. 128-50.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Lund, R, Nielsen, LS, Henriksen, PW, Schmidt, L, Avlund, K & Christensen, U 2014, 'Content validity and reliability of the Copenhagen social relations questionnaire', Journal of Aging and Health, bind 26, nr. 1, s. 128-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264313510033

APA

Lund, R., Nielsen, L. S., Henriksen, P. W., Schmidt, L., Avlund, K., & Christensen, U. (2014). Content validity and reliability of the Copenhagen social relations questionnaire. Journal of Aging and Health, 26(1), 128-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264313510033

Vancouver

Lund R, Nielsen LS, Henriksen PW, Schmidt L, Avlund K, Christensen U. Content validity and reliability of the Copenhagen social relations questionnaire. Journal of Aging and Health. 2014 feb;26(1):128-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264313510033

Author

Lund, Rikke ; Nielsen, Lene Snabe ; Henriksen, Pia Wichmann ; Schmidt, Lone ; Avlund, Kirsten ; Christensen, Ulla. / Content validity and reliability of the Copenhagen social relations questionnaire. I: Journal of Aging and Health. 2014 ; Bind 26, Nr. 1. s. 128-50.

Bibtex

@article{c7299eabbfdd4f3a80b6f9d1dbf4fcec,
title = "Content validity and reliability of the Copenhagen social relations questionnaire",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present article is to describe the face and content validity as well as reliability of the Copenhagen Social Relations Questionnaire (CSRQ).METHOD: The face and content validity test was based on focus group discussions and individual interviews with 31 informants. Another 94 men and women participated in an 8-day test-retest analysis.RESULTS: Informants generally expressed that the questions and response categories were relevant and easy to understand. Themes on structure of social relations, social support, and negative aspects of social relations emerged clearly from the interviews. Two additional themes not covered by CSRQ on dynamics and reciprocity of social relations were identified.DISCUSSION: CSRQ holds satisfactory face and content validity as well as reliability, and is suitable for measuring structure and function of social relations including the negative aspects among middle-aged individuals.",
keywords = "Denmark, Female, Focus Groups, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Qualitative Research, Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Social Support",
author = "Rikke Lund and Nielsen, {Lene Snabe} and Henriksen, {Pia Wichmann} and Lone Schmidt and Kirsten Avlund and Ulla Christensen",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/0898264313510033",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "128--50",
journal = "Journal of Aging and Health",
issn = "0898-2643",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Content validity and reliability of the Copenhagen social relations questionnaire

AU - Lund, Rikke

AU - Nielsen, Lene Snabe

AU - Henriksen, Pia Wichmann

AU - Schmidt, Lone

AU - Avlund, Kirsten

AU - Christensen, Ulla

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present article is to describe the face and content validity as well as reliability of the Copenhagen Social Relations Questionnaire (CSRQ).METHOD: The face and content validity test was based on focus group discussions and individual interviews with 31 informants. Another 94 men and women participated in an 8-day test-retest analysis.RESULTS: Informants generally expressed that the questions and response categories were relevant and easy to understand. Themes on structure of social relations, social support, and negative aspects of social relations emerged clearly from the interviews. Two additional themes not covered by CSRQ on dynamics and reciprocity of social relations were identified.DISCUSSION: CSRQ holds satisfactory face and content validity as well as reliability, and is suitable for measuring structure and function of social relations including the negative aspects among middle-aged individuals.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present article is to describe the face and content validity as well as reliability of the Copenhagen Social Relations Questionnaire (CSRQ).METHOD: The face and content validity test was based on focus group discussions and individual interviews with 31 informants. Another 94 men and women participated in an 8-day test-retest analysis.RESULTS: Informants generally expressed that the questions and response categories were relevant and easy to understand. Themes on structure of social relations, social support, and negative aspects of social relations emerged clearly from the interviews. Two additional themes not covered by CSRQ on dynamics and reciprocity of social relations were identified.DISCUSSION: CSRQ holds satisfactory face and content validity as well as reliability, and is suitable for measuring structure and function of social relations including the negative aspects among middle-aged individuals.

KW - Denmark

KW - Female

KW - Focus Groups

KW - Humans

KW - Interpersonal Relations

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Qualitative Research

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Social Support

U2 - 10.1177/0898264313510033

DO - 10.1177/0898264313510033

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24584264

VL - 26

SP - 128

EP - 150

JO - Journal of Aging and Health

JF - Journal of Aging and Health

SN - 0898-2643

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 117200896