Comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients: The TRAUMOX2 trial—Statistical analysis plan

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients : The TRAUMOX2 trial—Statistical analysis plan. / Arleth, Tobias; Baekgaard, Josefine; Siersma, Volkert; Klimek, Markus; Hinkelbein, Jochen; Rasmussen, Lars Simon; Steinmetz, Jacob; for The TRAUMOX2 Study Group.

I: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Bind 67, Nr. 6, 2023.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Arleth, T, Baekgaard, J, Siersma, V, Klimek, M, Hinkelbein, J, Rasmussen, LS, Steinmetz, J & for The TRAUMOX2 Study Group 2023, 'Comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients: The TRAUMOX2 trial—Statistical analysis plan', Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, bind 67, nr. 6. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14230

APA

Arleth, T., Baekgaard, J., Siersma, V., Klimek, M., Hinkelbein, J., Rasmussen, L. S., Steinmetz, J., & for The TRAUMOX2 Study Group (2023). Comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients: The TRAUMOX2 trial—Statistical analysis plan. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 67(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14230

Vancouver

Arleth T, Baekgaard J, Siersma V, Klimek M, Hinkelbein J, Rasmussen LS o.a. Comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients: The TRAUMOX2 trial—Statistical analysis plan. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2023;67(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14230

Author

Arleth, Tobias ; Baekgaard, Josefine ; Siersma, Volkert ; Klimek, Markus ; Hinkelbein, Jochen ; Rasmussen, Lars Simon ; Steinmetz, Jacob ; for The TRAUMOX2 Study Group. / Comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients : The TRAUMOX2 trial—Statistical analysis plan. I: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2023 ; Bind 67, Nr. 6.

Bibtex

@article{46987210e1744e1a8600b2d69ab24b68,
title = "Comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients: The TRAUMOX2 trial—Statistical analysis plan",
abstract = "Background: The international advanced trauma life support guidelines recommend that all severely injured trauma patients receive supplemental oxygen based on very limited evidence. The TRAUMOX2 trial randomises adult trauma patients to a restrictive or liberal oxygen strategy for 8 h. The primary composite outcome consists of 30-day mortality and/or development of major respiratory complications (pneumonia and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome). This manuscript presents the statistical analysis plan for TRAUMOX2. Methods: Patients are randomised 1:1 in variable block sizes of four, six and eight, stratified by including centre (pre-hospital base or trauma centre) and tracheal intubation at inclusion. The trial will include 1420 patients to be able to detect a 33% relative risk reduction with the restrictive oxygen strategy of the composite primary outcome with 80% power at the 5% significance level. We will conduct modified intention-to-treat analyses on all randomised patients and per-protocol analyses for the primary composite outcome and key secondary outcomes. The primary composite outcome and two key secondary outcomes will be compared between the two allocated groups using logistic regression reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals adjusted for the stratification variables as in the primary analysis. A p-value below 5% will be considered statistically significant. A Data Monitoring and Safety Committee has been established to conduct interim analyses after inclusion of 25% and 50% of the patients. Conclusion: This statistical analysis plan of the TRAUMOX2 trial will minimise bias and add transparency to the statistics applied in the analysis of the trial. The results will add evidence on restrictive and liberal supplemental oxygen strategies for trauma patients. Trial Registration: EudraCT number: 2021–000556-19; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05146700 (date of registration: 7 December 2021).",
keywords = "injury, oxygen, statistics, trauma, TRAUMOX2",
author = "Tobias Arleth and Josefine Baekgaard and Volkert Siersma and Markus Klimek and Jochen Hinkelbein and Rasmussen, {Lars Simon} and Jacob Steinmetz and {for The TRAUMOX2 Study Group}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1111/aas.14230",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
journal = "Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-5172",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients

T2 - The TRAUMOX2 trial—Statistical analysis plan

AU - Arleth, Tobias

AU - Baekgaard, Josefine

AU - Siersma, Volkert

AU - Klimek, Markus

AU - Hinkelbein, Jochen

AU - Rasmussen, Lars Simon

AU - Steinmetz, Jacob

AU - for The TRAUMOX2 Study Group

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Background: The international advanced trauma life support guidelines recommend that all severely injured trauma patients receive supplemental oxygen based on very limited evidence. The TRAUMOX2 trial randomises adult trauma patients to a restrictive or liberal oxygen strategy for 8 h. The primary composite outcome consists of 30-day mortality and/or development of major respiratory complications (pneumonia and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome). This manuscript presents the statistical analysis plan for TRAUMOX2. Methods: Patients are randomised 1:1 in variable block sizes of four, six and eight, stratified by including centre (pre-hospital base or trauma centre) and tracheal intubation at inclusion. The trial will include 1420 patients to be able to detect a 33% relative risk reduction with the restrictive oxygen strategy of the composite primary outcome with 80% power at the 5% significance level. We will conduct modified intention-to-treat analyses on all randomised patients and per-protocol analyses for the primary composite outcome and key secondary outcomes. The primary composite outcome and two key secondary outcomes will be compared between the two allocated groups using logistic regression reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals adjusted for the stratification variables as in the primary analysis. A p-value below 5% will be considered statistically significant. A Data Monitoring and Safety Committee has been established to conduct interim analyses after inclusion of 25% and 50% of the patients. Conclusion: This statistical analysis plan of the TRAUMOX2 trial will minimise bias and add transparency to the statistics applied in the analysis of the trial. The results will add evidence on restrictive and liberal supplemental oxygen strategies for trauma patients. Trial Registration: EudraCT number: 2021–000556-19; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05146700 (date of registration: 7 December 2021).

AB - Background: The international advanced trauma life support guidelines recommend that all severely injured trauma patients receive supplemental oxygen based on very limited evidence. The TRAUMOX2 trial randomises adult trauma patients to a restrictive or liberal oxygen strategy for 8 h. The primary composite outcome consists of 30-day mortality and/or development of major respiratory complications (pneumonia and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome). This manuscript presents the statistical analysis plan for TRAUMOX2. Methods: Patients are randomised 1:1 in variable block sizes of four, six and eight, stratified by including centre (pre-hospital base or trauma centre) and tracheal intubation at inclusion. The trial will include 1420 patients to be able to detect a 33% relative risk reduction with the restrictive oxygen strategy of the composite primary outcome with 80% power at the 5% significance level. We will conduct modified intention-to-treat analyses on all randomised patients and per-protocol analyses for the primary composite outcome and key secondary outcomes. The primary composite outcome and two key secondary outcomes will be compared between the two allocated groups using logistic regression reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals adjusted for the stratification variables as in the primary analysis. A p-value below 5% will be considered statistically significant. A Data Monitoring and Safety Committee has been established to conduct interim analyses after inclusion of 25% and 50% of the patients. Conclusion: This statistical analysis plan of the TRAUMOX2 trial will minimise bias and add transparency to the statistics applied in the analysis of the trial. The results will add evidence on restrictive and liberal supplemental oxygen strategies for trauma patients. Trial Registration: EudraCT number: 2021–000556-19; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05146700 (date of registration: 7 December 2021).

KW - injury

KW - oxygen

KW - statistics

KW - trauma

KW - TRAUMOX2

U2 - 10.1111/aas.14230

DO - 10.1111/aas.14230

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36906804

AN - SCOPUS:85151680437

VL - 67

JO - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-5172

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 342826231