Clinical evaluation of Synthetic Aperture Sequential Beamforming and Tissue Harmonic Imaging

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportKonferencebidrag i proceedingsForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Clinical evaluation of Synthetic Aperture Sequential Beamforming and Tissue Harmonic Imaging. / Brandt, Andreas Hjelm; Hemmsen, Martin Christian; Hansen, Peter Møller; Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov; Lange, Theis; Jensen, Jørgen Arendt; Nielsen, Michael Bachmann.

IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2014. s. 1312-1315 6931774 (IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS).

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportKonferencebidrag i proceedingsForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Brandt, AH, Hemmsen, MC, Hansen, PM, Hansen, KL, Lange, T, Jensen, JA & Nielsen, MB 2014, Clinical evaluation of Synthetic Aperture Sequential Beamforming and Tissue Harmonic Imaging. i IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS., 6931774, IEEE Computer Society Press, IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS, s. 1312-1315, 2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS 2014, Chicago, USA, 03/09/2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2014.0324

APA

Brandt, A. H., Hemmsen, M. C., Hansen, P. M., Hansen, K. L., Lange, T., Jensen, J. A., & Nielsen, M. B. (2014). Clinical evaluation of Synthetic Aperture Sequential Beamforming and Tissue Harmonic Imaging. I IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS (s. 1312-1315). [6931774] IEEE Computer Society Press. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2014.0324

Vancouver

Brandt AH, Hemmsen MC, Hansen PM, Hansen KL, Lange T, Jensen JA o.a. Clinical evaluation of Synthetic Aperture Sequential Beamforming and Tissue Harmonic Imaging. I IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS. IEEE Computer Society Press. 2014. s. 1312-1315. 6931774. (IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS). https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2014.0324

Author

Brandt, Andreas Hjelm ; Hemmsen, Martin Christian ; Hansen, Peter Møller ; Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov ; Lange, Theis ; Jensen, Jørgen Arendt ; Nielsen, Michael Bachmann. / Clinical evaluation of Synthetic Aperture Sequential Beamforming and Tissue Harmonic Imaging. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2014. s. 1312-1315 (IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS).

Bibtex

@inproceedings{2904b55cb836455b8b44e9c8558c5734,
title = "Clinical evaluation of Synthetic Aperture Sequential Beamforming and Tissue Harmonic Imaging",
abstract = "This study determines if the data reduction achieved by the combination Synthetic Aperture Sequential Beamforming (SASB) and Tissue Harmonic Imaging (THI) affects image quality. SASB-THI was evaluated against the combination of Dynamic Received Focusing and Tissue Harmonic Imaging (DRF-THI). A BK medical UltraView 800 ultrasound scanner equipped with a research interface and an abdominal 3.5 MHz 3.5CL192-3ML convex array transducer was used and connected to a stand alone PC. SASB-THI and DRF-THI scan sequences were recorded interleaved and processed offline. Nineteen patients diagnosed with focal liver pathology were scanned to set a clinical condition, where ultrasonography is often performed. A total of 114 sequences were recorded and evaluated by five radiologists. The evaluators were blinded to the imaging technique, and each sequence was shown twice with different left-right positioning, resulting in 1140 evaluations. The program Image Quality Assessment Program (IQap) and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were applied for the evaluation. The scale ranged from -50 to 50, where positive values favored SASB-THI. SASB-THI and DRF-THI were evaluated alike in 49% of the evaluations, 28% favored SASB-THI and 23% favored DRF-THI. The average rating was 0.70 (Cl: -0.80 to 2.19). The statistical analysis, where the hypothesis of no differences between the techniques was tested, yielded a p-value of p=0.64, indicating no preference to any technique. This study demonstrates that SASB-THI and DRF-THI have equally good image quality although a data reduction of 64 times is achieved with SASB-THI.",
keywords = "Comparison of techniques, Imagine quality evaluation, Synthetic Aperture Sequential Beamforming Tissue Harmonic Imaging",
author = "Brandt, {Andreas Hjelm} and Hemmsen, {Martin Christian} and Hansen, {Peter M{\o}ller} and Hansen, {Kristoffer Lindskov} and Theis Lange and Jensen, {J{\o}rgen Arendt} and Nielsen, {Michael Bachmann}",
year = "2014",
month = oct,
day = "20",
doi = "10.1109/ULTSYM.2014.0324",
language = "English",
series = "IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS",
publisher = "IEEE Computer Society Press",
pages = "1312--1315",
booktitle = "IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS",
address = "United States",
note = "2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS 2014 ; Conference date: 03-09-2014 Through 06-09-2014",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Clinical evaluation of Synthetic Aperture Sequential Beamforming and Tissue Harmonic Imaging

AU - Brandt, Andreas Hjelm

AU - Hemmsen, Martin Christian

AU - Hansen, Peter Møller

AU - Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov

AU - Lange, Theis

AU - Jensen, Jørgen Arendt

AU - Nielsen, Michael Bachmann

PY - 2014/10/20

Y1 - 2014/10/20

N2 - This study determines if the data reduction achieved by the combination Synthetic Aperture Sequential Beamforming (SASB) and Tissue Harmonic Imaging (THI) affects image quality. SASB-THI was evaluated against the combination of Dynamic Received Focusing and Tissue Harmonic Imaging (DRF-THI). A BK medical UltraView 800 ultrasound scanner equipped with a research interface and an abdominal 3.5 MHz 3.5CL192-3ML convex array transducer was used and connected to a stand alone PC. SASB-THI and DRF-THI scan sequences were recorded interleaved and processed offline. Nineteen patients diagnosed with focal liver pathology were scanned to set a clinical condition, where ultrasonography is often performed. A total of 114 sequences were recorded and evaluated by five radiologists. The evaluators were blinded to the imaging technique, and each sequence was shown twice with different left-right positioning, resulting in 1140 evaluations. The program Image Quality Assessment Program (IQap) and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were applied for the evaluation. The scale ranged from -50 to 50, where positive values favored SASB-THI. SASB-THI and DRF-THI were evaluated alike in 49% of the evaluations, 28% favored SASB-THI and 23% favored DRF-THI. The average rating was 0.70 (Cl: -0.80 to 2.19). The statistical analysis, where the hypothesis of no differences between the techniques was tested, yielded a p-value of p=0.64, indicating no preference to any technique. This study demonstrates that SASB-THI and DRF-THI have equally good image quality although a data reduction of 64 times is achieved with SASB-THI.

AB - This study determines if the data reduction achieved by the combination Synthetic Aperture Sequential Beamforming (SASB) and Tissue Harmonic Imaging (THI) affects image quality. SASB-THI was evaluated against the combination of Dynamic Received Focusing and Tissue Harmonic Imaging (DRF-THI). A BK medical UltraView 800 ultrasound scanner equipped with a research interface and an abdominal 3.5 MHz 3.5CL192-3ML convex array transducer was used and connected to a stand alone PC. SASB-THI and DRF-THI scan sequences were recorded interleaved and processed offline. Nineteen patients diagnosed with focal liver pathology were scanned to set a clinical condition, where ultrasonography is often performed. A total of 114 sequences were recorded and evaluated by five radiologists. The evaluators were blinded to the imaging technique, and each sequence was shown twice with different left-right positioning, resulting in 1140 evaluations. The program Image Quality Assessment Program (IQap) and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were applied for the evaluation. The scale ranged from -50 to 50, where positive values favored SASB-THI. SASB-THI and DRF-THI were evaluated alike in 49% of the evaluations, 28% favored SASB-THI and 23% favored DRF-THI. The average rating was 0.70 (Cl: -0.80 to 2.19). The statistical analysis, where the hypothesis of no differences between the techniques was tested, yielded a p-value of p=0.64, indicating no preference to any technique. This study demonstrates that SASB-THI and DRF-THI have equally good image quality although a data reduction of 64 times is achieved with SASB-THI.

KW - Comparison of techniques

KW - Imagine quality evaluation

KW - Synthetic Aperture Sequential Beamforming Tissue Harmonic Imaging

U2 - 10.1109/ULTSYM.2014.0324

DO - 10.1109/ULTSYM.2014.0324

M3 - Article in proceedings

AN - SCOPUS:84910028228

T3 - IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS

SP - 1312

EP - 1315

BT - IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS

PB - IEEE Computer Society Press

T2 - 2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS 2014

Y2 - 3 September 2014 through 6 September 2014

ER -

ID: 239625772