Classification of sudden and arrhythmic death

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Classification of sudden and arrhythmic death. / Torp-Pedersen, C; Køber, L; Elming, H; Burchart, H.

I: Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Bind 20, Nr. 10 Pt 2, 1997, s. 2545-52.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Torp-Pedersen, C, Køber, L, Elming, H & Burchart, H 1997, 'Classification of sudden and arrhythmic death', Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, bind 20, nr. 10 Pt 2, s. 2545-52.

APA

Torp-Pedersen, C., Køber, L., Elming, H., & Burchart, H. (1997). Classification of sudden and arrhythmic death. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 20(10 Pt 2), 2545-52.

Vancouver

Torp-Pedersen C, Køber L, Elming H, Burchart H. Classification of sudden and arrhythmic death. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 1997;20(10 Pt 2):2545-52.

Author

Torp-Pedersen, C ; Køber, L ; Elming, H ; Burchart, H. / Classification of sudden and arrhythmic death. I: Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 1997 ; Bind 20, Nr. 10 Pt 2. s. 2545-52.

Bibtex

@article{c1778120123711df803f000ea68e967b,
title = "Classification of sudden and arrhythmic death",
abstract = "Since all death is (eventually) sudden and associated with cardiac arrhythmias, the concept of sudden death is only meaningful if it is unexpected, while arrhythmic death is only meaningful if life could have continued had the arrhythmia been prevented or treated. Current classifications of death as being arrhythmic or sudden are all biased by the difficulty of having to decide on the degree of unexpectedness or the likelihood that life could continue without the arrhythmia. The uncertainties are enlarged by the fact that critical data (such as knowledge of arrhythmias at the time of death or autopsy) are available in only a few percent of cases. A main problem in using classifications is the lack of validation data. This situation has, with the MADIT trial, changed in the case of the Thaler and Hinkle classification of arrhythmic death. The MADIT trial demonstrated that arrhythmic death was nearly abolished by the implantable defibrillator, indicating that arrhythmic death by this classification is meaningful, at least in the population studied. For future investigations, a call is made for committees to present data in a way that allows the reader to examine the quality of the data used for evaluation.",
author = "C Torp-Pedersen and L K{\o}ber and H Elming and H Burchart",
note = "Keywords: Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Death; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Defibrillators, Implantable; Humans",
year = "1997",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "2545--52",
journal = "PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology",
issn = "0147-8389",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10 Pt 2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Classification of sudden and arrhythmic death

AU - Torp-Pedersen, C

AU - Køber, L

AU - Elming, H

AU - Burchart, H

N1 - Keywords: Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Death; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Defibrillators, Implantable; Humans

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Since all death is (eventually) sudden and associated with cardiac arrhythmias, the concept of sudden death is only meaningful if it is unexpected, while arrhythmic death is only meaningful if life could have continued had the arrhythmia been prevented or treated. Current classifications of death as being arrhythmic or sudden are all biased by the difficulty of having to decide on the degree of unexpectedness or the likelihood that life could continue without the arrhythmia. The uncertainties are enlarged by the fact that critical data (such as knowledge of arrhythmias at the time of death or autopsy) are available in only a few percent of cases. A main problem in using classifications is the lack of validation data. This situation has, with the MADIT trial, changed in the case of the Thaler and Hinkle classification of arrhythmic death. The MADIT trial demonstrated that arrhythmic death was nearly abolished by the implantable defibrillator, indicating that arrhythmic death by this classification is meaningful, at least in the population studied. For future investigations, a call is made for committees to present data in a way that allows the reader to examine the quality of the data used for evaluation.

AB - Since all death is (eventually) sudden and associated with cardiac arrhythmias, the concept of sudden death is only meaningful if it is unexpected, while arrhythmic death is only meaningful if life could have continued had the arrhythmia been prevented or treated. Current classifications of death as being arrhythmic or sudden are all biased by the difficulty of having to decide on the degree of unexpectedness or the likelihood that life could continue without the arrhythmia. The uncertainties are enlarged by the fact that critical data (such as knowledge of arrhythmias at the time of death or autopsy) are available in only a few percent of cases. A main problem in using classifications is the lack of validation data. This situation has, with the MADIT trial, changed in the case of the Thaler and Hinkle classification of arrhythmic death. The MADIT trial demonstrated that arrhythmic death was nearly abolished by the implantable defibrillator, indicating that arrhythmic death by this classification is meaningful, at least in the population studied. For future investigations, a call is made for committees to present data in a way that allows the reader to examine the quality of the data used for evaluation.

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 9358501

VL - 20

SP - 2545

EP - 2552

JO - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

JF - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

SN - 0147-8389

IS - 10 Pt 2

ER -

ID: 17422180