A Response to 'Attribution Science and the Fate of Climate Change Litigation' - Benoit Mayer

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Formidling

Standard

A Response to 'Attribution Science and the Fate of Climate Change Litigation' - Benoit Mayer. / Otto, Friederike; Minnerop, Petra; Raju, Emmanuel; Harrington, Luke; Stuart-Smith, Rupert F; Boyd, Emily; James, Rachel; Jones, Richard G; Lauta, Kristian Cedervall.

I: Global Policy, Bind 14, Nr. 2, 2023, s. 416-416.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Formidling

Harvard

Otto, F, Minnerop, P, Raju, E, Harrington, L, Stuart-Smith, RF, Boyd, E, James, R, Jones, RG & Lauta, KC 2023, 'A Response to 'Attribution Science and the Fate of Climate Change Litigation' - Benoit Mayer', Global Policy, bind 14, nr. 2, s. 416-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13174

APA

Otto, F., Minnerop, P., Raju, E., Harrington, L., Stuart-Smith, R. F., Boyd, E., James, R., Jones, R. G., & Lauta, K. C. (2023). A Response to 'Attribution Science and the Fate of Climate Change Litigation' - Benoit Mayer. Global Policy, 14(2), 416-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13174

Vancouver

Otto F, Minnerop P, Raju E, Harrington L, Stuart-Smith RF, Boyd E o.a. A Response to 'Attribution Science and the Fate of Climate Change Litigation' - Benoit Mayer. Global Policy. 2023;14(2):416-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13174

Author

Otto, Friederike ; Minnerop, Petra ; Raju, Emmanuel ; Harrington, Luke ; Stuart-Smith, Rupert F ; Boyd, Emily ; James, Rachel ; Jones, Richard G ; Lauta, Kristian Cedervall. / A Response to 'Attribution Science and the Fate of Climate Change Litigation' - Benoit Mayer. I: Global Policy. 2023 ; Bind 14, Nr. 2. s. 416-416.

Bibtex

@article{9ab0de5ed5be4990900503dd8bbe37ec,
title = "A Response to 'Attribution Science and the Fate of Climate Change Litigation' - Benoit Mayer",
abstract = "In the article Causality and the fate of climate litigation: The role of the social superstructure narrative, we argue that an enhanced and wider understanding of attribution science will shape the social superstructure narrative of climate change. This social superstructure narrative influences courts in their decision-making. Benoit Mayer, in the same issue, has commented on our article. We use this rejoinder to clarify three elements of Mayer's comments in his response to help avoid any misconception of our argument or misunderstanding of the German Civil Code and thus hopefully enrich the discussion. These clarifications speak to the role of the courts first to preserve the rule of law and second in the context of climate change with the third clarification relating to the legal basis of a specific claim under German law.",
author = "Friederike Otto and Petra Minnerop and Emmanuel Raju and Luke Harrington and Stuart-Smith, {Rupert F} and Emily Boyd and Rachel James and Jones, {Richard G} and Lauta, {Kristian Cedervall}",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1111/1758-5899.13174",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "416--416",
journal = "Global Policy",
issn = "1758-5880",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Response to 'Attribution Science and the Fate of Climate Change Litigation' - Benoit Mayer

AU - Otto, Friederike

AU - Minnerop, Petra

AU - Raju, Emmanuel

AU - Harrington, Luke

AU - Stuart-Smith, Rupert F

AU - Boyd, Emily

AU - James, Rachel

AU - Jones, Richard G

AU - Lauta, Kristian Cedervall

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - In the article Causality and the fate of climate litigation: The role of the social superstructure narrative, we argue that an enhanced and wider understanding of attribution science will shape the social superstructure narrative of climate change. This social superstructure narrative influences courts in their decision-making. Benoit Mayer, in the same issue, has commented on our article. We use this rejoinder to clarify three elements of Mayer's comments in his response to help avoid any misconception of our argument or misunderstanding of the German Civil Code and thus hopefully enrich the discussion. These clarifications speak to the role of the courts first to preserve the rule of law and second in the context of climate change with the third clarification relating to the legal basis of a specific claim under German law.

AB - In the article Causality and the fate of climate litigation: The role of the social superstructure narrative, we argue that an enhanced and wider understanding of attribution science will shape the social superstructure narrative of climate change. This social superstructure narrative influences courts in their decision-making. Benoit Mayer, in the same issue, has commented on our article. We use this rejoinder to clarify three elements of Mayer's comments in his response to help avoid any misconception of our argument or misunderstanding of the German Civil Code and thus hopefully enrich the discussion. These clarifications speak to the role of the courts first to preserve the rule of law and second in the context of climate change with the third clarification relating to the legal basis of a specific claim under German law.

U2 - 10.1111/1758-5899.13174

DO - 10.1111/1758-5899.13174

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

SP - 416

EP - 416

JO - Global Policy

JF - Global Policy

SN - 1758-5880

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 335691924