Prevalence and prescribing patterns of oral corticosteroids in the United States, Taiwan, and Denmark, 2009–2018

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 306 KB, PDF-dokument

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are commonly prescribed for acute, self-limited conditions, despite studies demonstrating toxicity. Studies evaluating longitudinal OCS prescribing in the general population are scarce and do not compare use across countries. This study investigated and compared OCS prescription patterns from 2009 to 2018 in the general populations of the United States, Taiwan, and Denmark. This international population-based longitudinal cohort study used nationwide claims databases (United States: Optum Clinformatics Data Mart; de-identified; Taiwan: National Health Insurance Research Database; and Denmark: National Prescription and Patient Registries/Danish National Patient Registry) to evaluate OCS prescribing. We classified annual OCS duration as short-term (1–29 days), medium-term (30–89 days), or long-term (≥90 days). Longitudinal change in annual prevalence of OCS use and physician prescribing patterns were reported. Among 54,630,437 participants, average annual percentage of overall OCS use was 6.8% in the United States, 17.5% in Taiwan, and 2.2% in Denmark during 2009–2018. Prevalence of OCS prescribing increased at an average annual rate of 0.1%–0.17%, mainly driven by short-term prescribing to healthy adults. One-quarter to one-fifth of OCS prescribing was associated with a diagnosis of respiratory infection. Family practice and internal medicine physicians were among the highest OCS prescribers across countries and durations. Age- and sex-stratified trends mirrored unstratified trends. This study provides real-world evidence of an ongoing steady increase in OCS use in the general populations of the United States, Taiwan, and Denmark. This increase is largely driven by short-term OCS prescribing to healthy adults, a practice previously viewed as safe but recently shown to incur substantial population-level risk.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftClinical and Translational Science
Vol/bind16
Udgave nummer12
Sider (fra-til)2565-2576
Antal sider12
ISSN1752-8054
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2023

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by grants from National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan (PI: Tsai, PH‐111‐PP‐08), Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (PIs: Tsai, MOST 107‐2314‐B‐400‐031‐MY3; and Yao, MOST 106‐2314‐B‐182‐051‐MY3 and MOST 109‐2314‐B‐182‐042‐MY3), Chang Gung Medical Foundation (PI: Yao, CMRPG3F1711‐3, CMRPG3F0361, CMRPG3J0121, and CMRPG3K1371). Dr. Wallace received no direct support for this work, but her effort during the time of this work was supported by the Veterans Affairs Administration (IK2CX002430) and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (KL2TR002241).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

ID: 379031925