Obesity as a clinical and public health problem: is there a need for a new definition based on lipotoxicity effects?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Obesity as a clinical and public health problem: is there a need for a new definition based on lipotoxicity effects? / Sørensen, Thorkild I A; Virtue, Sam; Vidal-Puig, Antonio.

I: B B A - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, Bind 1801, Nr. 3, 01.03.2010, s. 400-4.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Sørensen, TIA, Virtue, S & Vidal-Puig, A 2010, 'Obesity as a clinical and public health problem: is there a need for a new definition based on lipotoxicity effects?', B B A - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, bind 1801, nr. 3, s. 400-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.12.011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.12.011

APA

Sørensen, T. I. A., Virtue, S., & Vidal-Puig, A. (2010). Obesity as a clinical and public health problem: is there a need for a new definition based on lipotoxicity effects? B B A - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, 1801(3), 400-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.12.011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.12.011

Vancouver

Sørensen TIA, Virtue S, Vidal-Puig A. Obesity as a clinical and public health problem: is there a need for a new definition based on lipotoxicity effects? B B A - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids. 2010 mar. 1;1801(3):400-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.12.011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.12.011

Author

Sørensen, Thorkild I A ; Virtue, Sam ; Vidal-Puig, Antonio. / Obesity as a clinical and public health problem: is there a need for a new definition based on lipotoxicity effects?. I: B B A - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids. 2010 ; Bind 1801, Nr. 3. s. 400-4.

Bibtex

@article{7fb017ceab33488f8a57ed3164e6f823,
title = "Obesity as a clinical and public health problem: is there a need for a new definition based on lipotoxicity effects?",
abstract = "The risk functions for obesity (defined as the quantitative relation between degree of obesity throughout its range and the risk of health problems) have been used to define 'obesity' as an excess storage of fat in the body to such an extent that it causes health problems leading to increased mortality. The lipotoxicity theory implies that the fat stored in droplets of triglycerides in the cells are biologically inert and that the metabolic dysfunctions are primarily due to the increased exposure of the cells to fatty acids. If this is true, it has profound implications for the interpretations of the multiple epidemiological studies of the risk functions. It is obvious from all these studies that the sizes of the fat depots are risk indicators of health effects in various ways. Paradoxically, the sizes of the fat stores are also indicators of the preceding implementation of the ability of the body to protect itself against the toxic effects of the free fatty acids. The current risk of metabolic dysfunctions appears to be determined by the balance between the rate of loading of the body with fatty acids and the rate of eliminating the fatty acids by either triglyceride storage or oxidation. The progress in the development of the dysfunction then depends on the persistence of the imbalance leading to future cumulative exposure of the cells to the toxic effects of the fatty acids rather than on the current size of the fat depots. This may be considered as a reason for changing the definition of obesity to one based on better estimates of future risks of health problems derived from later metabolic dysfunctions rather than on the past coping with the exposure to the fatty acids by storage as triglycerides. Implementation of such definition would require a test that measures this residual capacity to avoid excess exposure of the cells to the fatty acids before the metabolic dysfunctions have emerged. In analogy with the glucose tolerance test, a fatty acid tolerance test may be needed to identify individuals who are at a level of risk for developing lipotoxicity induced metabolic dysfunctions such that they require intervention. This test would ideally be a single biomarker that would determine residual capacity for adipose expansion, fatty acid oxidation and safe ectopic lipid deposition.",
author = "S{\o}rensen, {Thorkild I A} and Sam Virtue and Antonio Vidal-Puig",
note = "Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2010",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.12.011",
language = "English",
volume = "1801",
pages = "400--4",
journal = "B B A - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids",
issn = "1388-1981",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Obesity as a clinical and public health problem: is there a need for a new definition based on lipotoxicity effects?

AU - Sørensen, Thorkild I A

AU - Virtue, Sam

AU - Vidal-Puig, Antonio

N1 - Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

N2 - The risk functions for obesity (defined as the quantitative relation between degree of obesity throughout its range and the risk of health problems) have been used to define 'obesity' as an excess storage of fat in the body to such an extent that it causes health problems leading to increased mortality. The lipotoxicity theory implies that the fat stored in droplets of triglycerides in the cells are biologically inert and that the metabolic dysfunctions are primarily due to the increased exposure of the cells to fatty acids. If this is true, it has profound implications for the interpretations of the multiple epidemiological studies of the risk functions. It is obvious from all these studies that the sizes of the fat depots are risk indicators of health effects in various ways. Paradoxically, the sizes of the fat stores are also indicators of the preceding implementation of the ability of the body to protect itself against the toxic effects of the free fatty acids. The current risk of metabolic dysfunctions appears to be determined by the balance between the rate of loading of the body with fatty acids and the rate of eliminating the fatty acids by either triglyceride storage or oxidation. The progress in the development of the dysfunction then depends on the persistence of the imbalance leading to future cumulative exposure of the cells to the toxic effects of the fatty acids rather than on the current size of the fat depots. This may be considered as a reason for changing the definition of obesity to one based on better estimates of future risks of health problems derived from later metabolic dysfunctions rather than on the past coping with the exposure to the fatty acids by storage as triglycerides. Implementation of such definition would require a test that measures this residual capacity to avoid excess exposure of the cells to the fatty acids before the metabolic dysfunctions have emerged. In analogy with the glucose tolerance test, a fatty acid tolerance test may be needed to identify individuals who are at a level of risk for developing lipotoxicity induced metabolic dysfunctions such that they require intervention. This test would ideally be a single biomarker that would determine residual capacity for adipose expansion, fatty acid oxidation and safe ectopic lipid deposition.

AB - The risk functions for obesity (defined as the quantitative relation between degree of obesity throughout its range and the risk of health problems) have been used to define 'obesity' as an excess storage of fat in the body to such an extent that it causes health problems leading to increased mortality. The lipotoxicity theory implies that the fat stored in droplets of triglycerides in the cells are biologically inert and that the metabolic dysfunctions are primarily due to the increased exposure of the cells to fatty acids. If this is true, it has profound implications for the interpretations of the multiple epidemiological studies of the risk functions. It is obvious from all these studies that the sizes of the fat depots are risk indicators of health effects in various ways. Paradoxically, the sizes of the fat stores are also indicators of the preceding implementation of the ability of the body to protect itself against the toxic effects of the free fatty acids. The current risk of metabolic dysfunctions appears to be determined by the balance between the rate of loading of the body with fatty acids and the rate of eliminating the fatty acids by either triglyceride storage or oxidation. The progress in the development of the dysfunction then depends on the persistence of the imbalance leading to future cumulative exposure of the cells to the toxic effects of the fatty acids rather than on the current size of the fat depots. This may be considered as a reason for changing the definition of obesity to one based on better estimates of future risks of health problems derived from later metabolic dysfunctions rather than on the past coping with the exposure to the fatty acids by storage as triglycerides. Implementation of such definition would require a test that measures this residual capacity to avoid excess exposure of the cells to the fatty acids before the metabolic dysfunctions have emerged. In analogy with the glucose tolerance test, a fatty acid tolerance test may be needed to identify individuals who are at a level of risk for developing lipotoxicity induced metabolic dysfunctions such that they require intervention. This test would ideally be a single biomarker that would determine residual capacity for adipose expansion, fatty acid oxidation and safe ectopic lipid deposition.

U2 - 10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.12.011

DO - 10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.12.011

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 20045743

VL - 1801

SP - 400

EP - 404

JO - B B A - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids

JF - B B A - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids

SN - 1388-1981

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 40208197