Database of epidemic trends and control measures during the first wave of COVID-19 in mainland China

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 2,1 MB, PDF-dokument

  • Han Fu
  • Haowei Wang
  • Xiaoyue Xi
  • Adhiratha Boonyasiri
  • Yuanrong Wang
  • Wes Hinsley
  • Keith J. Fraser
  • Ruth McCabe
  • Daniela Olivera Mesa
  • Janetta Skarp
  • Alice Ledda
  • Tamsin Dewé
  • Amy Dighe
  • Peter Winskill
  • Sabine L. van Elsland
  • Kylie E.C. Ainslie
  • Marc Baguelin
  • Olivia Boyd
  • Nicholas F. Brazeau
  • Lorenzo Cattarino
  • Giovanni Charles
  • Zulma M. Cucunuba
  • Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg
  • Christl A. Donnelly
  • Ilaria Dorigatti
  • Oliver D. Eales
  • Richard G. FitzJohn
  • Seth Flaxman
  • Katy A.M. Gaythorpe
  • Azra C. Ghani
  • William D. Green
  • Arran Hamlet
  • Katharina Hauck
  • David J. Haw
  • Benjamin Jeffrey
  • Daniel J. Laydon
  • John A. Lees
  • Thomas Mellan
  • Swapnil Mishra
  • Gemma Nedjati-Gilani
  • Pierre Nouvellet
  • Lucy Okell
  • Kris V. Parag
  • Manon Ragonnet-Cronin
  • Steven Riley
  • Nora Schmit
  • Hayley A. Thompson
  • H. Juliette T. Unwin
  • Robert Verity
  • Michaela A.C. Vollmer
  • Erik Volz
  • Patrick G.T. Walker
  • Caroline E. Walters
  • Oliver J. Watson
  • Charles Whittaker
  • Lilith K. Whittles
  • Natsuko Imai
  • Sangeeta Bhatia
  • Neil M. Ferguson

Objectives: In this data collation study, we aimed to provide a comprehensive database describing the epidemic trends and responses during the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) throughout the main provinces in China. Methods: From mid-January to March 2020, we extracted publicly available data regarding the spread and control of COVID-19 from 31 provincial health authorities and major media outlets in mainland China. Based on these data, we conducted descriptive analyses of the epidemic in the six most-affected provinces. Results: School closures, travel restrictions, community-level lockdown, and contact tracing were introduced concurrently around late January but subsequent epidemic trends differed among provinces. Compared with Hubei, the other five most-affected provinces reported a lower crude case fatality ratio and proportion of critical and severe hospitalised cases. From March 2020, as the local transmission of COVID-19 declined, switching the focus of measures to the testing and quarantine of inbound travellers may have helped to sustain the control of the epidemic. Conclusions: Aggregated indicators of case notifications and severity distributions are essential for monitoring an epidemic. A publicly available database containing these indicators and information regarding control measures is a useful resource for further research and policy planning in response to the COVID-19 epidemic.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases
Vol/bind102
Sider (fra-til)463-471
Antal sider9
ISSN1201-9712
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2021
Eksternt udgivetJa

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
We acknowledge Joint Centre Funding from the UK Medical Research Council and Department for International Development [grant number MR/R015600/1 ]. This study was also supported by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Modelling Methodology , the Abdul Latif Jameel Foundation , and the EDCTP2 programme supported by the European Union .

Funding Information:
We acknowledge Joint Centre Funding from the UK Medical Research Council and Department for International Development [grant number MR/R015600/1]. This study was also supported by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Modelling Methodology, the Abdul Latif Jameel Foundation, and the EDCTP2 programme supported by the European Union.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s)

ID: 290663494