The reliability of child psychiatric diagnosis. A comparison among Danish child psychiatrists of traditional diagnoses and a multiaxial diagnostic system

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

The reliability of child psychiatric diagnosis. A comparison among Danish child psychiatrists of traditional diagnoses and a multiaxial diagnostic system. / Skovgaard, A M; Isager, T; Jørgensen, O S.

I: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Bind 77, Nr. 4, 04.1988, s. 469-76.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Skovgaard, AM, Isager, T & Jørgensen, OS 1988, 'The reliability of child psychiatric diagnosis. A comparison among Danish child psychiatrists of traditional diagnoses and a multiaxial diagnostic system', Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, bind 77, nr. 4, s. 469-76.

APA

Skovgaard, A. M., Isager, T., & Jørgensen, O. S. (1988). The reliability of child psychiatric diagnosis. A comparison among Danish child psychiatrists of traditional diagnoses and a multiaxial diagnostic system. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 77(4), 469-76.

Vancouver

Skovgaard AM, Isager T, Jørgensen OS. The reliability of child psychiatric diagnosis. A comparison among Danish child psychiatrists of traditional diagnoses and a multiaxial diagnostic system. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1988 apr.;77(4):469-76.

Author

Skovgaard, A M ; Isager, T ; Jørgensen, O S. / The reliability of child psychiatric diagnosis. A comparison among Danish child psychiatrists of traditional diagnoses and a multiaxial diagnostic system. I: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1988 ; Bind 77, Nr. 4. s. 469-76.

Bibtex

@article{cb2103b9e1074983a8cef84c3b4061fa,
title = "The reliability of child psychiatric diagnosis. A comparison among Danish child psychiatrists of traditional diagnoses and a multiaxial diagnostic system",
abstract = "The study was conducted to compare an experimental multiaxial diagnostic system (MAS) with traditional multicategorical diagnoses in child psychiatric work. Sixteen written case histories were circulated to 21 child psychiatrists, who made diagnoses independently of one another, using two different diagnostic systems. Diagnostic reliability was measured as percentage of interrater agreement. The highest diagnostic reliability was obtained in psychotic disorders, the lowest in personality disorders. The MAS implied improved diagnostic reliability of mental retardation, somatic disorders and developmental disorders. Adjustment reaction (reactio maladaptiva) was the diagnosis most commonly used, but with varying reliability in both systems. The reliability of the socio-economic and psychosocial axes were generally high.",
keywords = "Adjustment Disorders, Child, Child Psychiatry, Denmark, Humans, Mental Disorders, Neurotic Disorders, Personality Disorders, Psychotic Disorders, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't",
author = "Skovgaard, {A M} and T Isager and J{\o}rgensen, {O S}",
year = "1988",
month = apr,
language = "English",
volume = "77",
pages = "469--76",
journal = "Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-690X",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The reliability of child psychiatric diagnosis. A comparison among Danish child psychiatrists of traditional diagnoses and a multiaxial diagnostic system

AU - Skovgaard, A M

AU - Isager, T

AU - Jørgensen, O S

PY - 1988/4

Y1 - 1988/4

N2 - The study was conducted to compare an experimental multiaxial diagnostic system (MAS) with traditional multicategorical diagnoses in child psychiatric work. Sixteen written case histories were circulated to 21 child psychiatrists, who made diagnoses independently of one another, using two different diagnostic systems. Diagnostic reliability was measured as percentage of interrater agreement. The highest diagnostic reliability was obtained in psychotic disorders, the lowest in personality disorders. The MAS implied improved diagnostic reliability of mental retardation, somatic disorders and developmental disorders. Adjustment reaction (reactio maladaptiva) was the diagnosis most commonly used, but with varying reliability in both systems. The reliability of the socio-economic and psychosocial axes were generally high.

AB - The study was conducted to compare an experimental multiaxial diagnostic system (MAS) with traditional multicategorical diagnoses in child psychiatric work. Sixteen written case histories were circulated to 21 child psychiatrists, who made diagnoses independently of one another, using two different diagnostic systems. Diagnostic reliability was measured as percentage of interrater agreement. The highest diagnostic reliability was obtained in psychotic disorders, the lowest in personality disorders. The MAS implied improved diagnostic reliability of mental retardation, somatic disorders and developmental disorders. Adjustment reaction (reactio maladaptiva) was the diagnosis most commonly used, but with varying reliability in both systems. The reliability of the socio-economic and psychosocial axes were generally high.

KW - Adjustment Disorders

KW - Child

KW - Child Psychiatry

KW - Denmark

KW - Humans

KW - Mental Disorders

KW - Neurotic Disorders

KW - Personality Disorders

KW - Psychotic Disorders

KW - Comparative Study

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 3389185

VL - 77

SP - 469

EP - 476

JO - Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-690X

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 182127473