Pregnancy outcomes after recurrent pregnancy loss: a longitudinal cohort study on stress and depression
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Pregnancy outcomes after recurrent pregnancy loss : a longitudinal cohort study on stress and depression. / Kolte, A.M.; Olsen, L.R.; Christiansen, O.B.; Schmidt, Lone; Nielsen, H.S.
I: Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Bind 38, Nr. 4, 2019, s. 599-605.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Pregnancy outcomes after recurrent pregnancy loss
T2 - a longitudinal cohort study on stress and depression
AU - Kolte, A.M.
AU - Olsen, L.R.
AU - Christiansen, O.B.
AU - Schmidt, Lone
AU - Nielsen, H.S.
N1 - Copyright © 2018 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - RESEARCH QUESTION: Are self-reported symptoms of stress and depression associated with pregnancy outcomes within the first year after referral to a tertiary recurrent pregnancy loss unit?DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with online questionnaires using the Major Depression Inventory (MDI) and Cohen's Stress Scale (PSS) at referral and after 1 year. The study was conducted between 2010 and 2014. A total of 301 women who had experienced recurrent pregnancy loss completed the first questionnaire. One year after referral, 185 women (61%) completed a follow-up questionnaire.RESULTS: A score above the threshold for major depression on the MDI at referral was not a predictor for outcome in the first pregnancy after referral; OR (95% CI) for live birth 1.71 (0.66 to 4.44), neither was increasing scores on the PSS: OR 0.98 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.02). At follow-up, women who had achieved a pregnancy resulting in a live birth had significantly lower scores on both the MDI: 13.45 (11.05) versus 11.04 (11.07); difference -2.41 (95% CI -4.60 to -0.23); and the PSS: mean 17.69 (7.59) versus 13.03 (6.83); difference -4.66 (95% CI -6.04 to -3.28), respectively. This was not the case for women who did not have a successful pregnancy. Women who experienced recurrent pregnancy loss after a successful birth were less likely to report symptoms corresponding to major depression than women who had only experienced losses (n = 7 [5%] versus 19 [12%]; P = 0.04).CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported emotional distress did not affect future chance of live birth. A live born child decreased emotional distress.
AB - RESEARCH QUESTION: Are self-reported symptoms of stress and depression associated with pregnancy outcomes within the first year after referral to a tertiary recurrent pregnancy loss unit?DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with online questionnaires using the Major Depression Inventory (MDI) and Cohen's Stress Scale (PSS) at referral and after 1 year. The study was conducted between 2010 and 2014. A total of 301 women who had experienced recurrent pregnancy loss completed the first questionnaire. One year after referral, 185 women (61%) completed a follow-up questionnaire.RESULTS: A score above the threshold for major depression on the MDI at referral was not a predictor for outcome in the first pregnancy after referral; OR (95% CI) for live birth 1.71 (0.66 to 4.44), neither was increasing scores on the PSS: OR 0.98 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.02). At follow-up, women who had achieved a pregnancy resulting in a live birth had significantly lower scores on both the MDI: 13.45 (11.05) versus 11.04 (11.07); difference -2.41 (95% CI -4.60 to -0.23); and the PSS: mean 17.69 (7.59) versus 13.03 (6.83); difference -4.66 (95% CI -6.04 to -3.28), respectively. This was not the case for women who did not have a successful pregnancy. Women who experienced recurrent pregnancy loss after a successful birth were less likely to report symptoms corresponding to major depression than women who had only experienced losses (n = 7 [5%] versus 19 [12%]; P = 0.04).CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported emotional distress did not affect future chance of live birth. A live born child decreased emotional distress.
U2 - 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.006
DO - 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.006
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 30819570
VL - 38
SP - 599
EP - 605
JO - Reproductive BioMedicine Online
JF - Reproductive BioMedicine Online
SN - 1472-6483
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 216160815