'More constricting than inspiring' - GPs find chronic care programmes of limited clinical utility. A qualitative study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

'More constricting than inspiring' - GPs find chronic care programmes of limited clinical utility. A qualitative study. / Kristensen, Mads Aage Toft; Due, Tina Drud; Hølge-Hazelton, Bibi; Guassora, Ann Dorrit; Waldorff, Frans Boch.

I: British Journal of General Practice Open , Bind 2, Nr. 2, 2018.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Kristensen, MAT, Due, TD, Hølge-Hazelton, B, Guassora, AD & Waldorff, FB 2018, ''More constricting than inspiring' - GPs find chronic care programmes of limited clinical utility. A qualitative study', British Journal of General Practice Open , bind 2, nr. 2. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101591

APA

Kristensen, M. A. T., Due, T. D., Hølge-Hazelton, B., Guassora, A. D., & Waldorff, F. B. (2018). 'More constricting than inspiring' - GPs find chronic care programmes of limited clinical utility. A qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice Open , 2(2). https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101591

Vancouver

Kristensen MAT, Due TD, Hølge-Hazelton B, Guassora AD, Waldorff FB. 'More constricting than inspiring' - GPs find chronic care programmes of limited clinical utility. A qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice Open . 2018;2(2). https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101591

Author

Kristensen, Mads Aage Toft ; Due, Tina Drud ; Hølge-Hazelton, Bibi ; Guassora, Ann Dorrit ; Waldorff, Frans Boch. / 'More constricting than inspiring' - GPs find chronic care programmes of limited clinical utility. A qualitative study. I: British Journal of General Practice Open . 2018 ; Bind 2, Nr. 2.

Bibtex

@article{37b70eb961b64bdb923c34fa238f49f5,
title = "'More constricting than inspiring' - GPs find chronic care programmes of limited clinical utility. A qualitative study",
abstract = "Background: As in other countries, Danish health authorities have introduced disease management programmes (DMPs) to improve care quality. These contain clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and guidelines for patient stratification based on doctors' assessments of disease severity and self-care. However, these programmes are challenged when patients have complex chronic conditions. Aim: To explore how GPs experience the clinical applicability of disease management programmes for patients with multiple chronic conditions and lowered self-care ability. Design & setting: A qualitative study from general practice, conducted in rural areas of Denmark with economically disadvantaged populations. Method: Data were collected through case-based, semi-structured interviews with 12 GPs. The principles of systematic text condensation were used in the analysis. Results: GPs found DMPs inadequate, particularly for patients with multiple conditions and lowered self-care ability. Their experience was that adhering to multiple programmes' CPGs resulted in too much medication, conflicting treatments, an overload of appointments, and fragmented health care. They disregarded stratifying according to guidelines because they deemed stratification criteria to reflect neither patients' need for self-care support, nor flexible referral options to hospitals and municipalities. Therefore, GPs were often solely responsible for treatment of patients with very complex chronic conditions. Conclusion: GPs found DMPs to be of limited clinical applicability due to challenges related to CPGs, patient stratification, and lack of adequate health services to support patients with complex healthcare needs. To increase the benefits of these programmes, they should be more flexible, and adjusted to the needs of patients with multiple chronic conditions and lowered self-care ability.",
keywords = "Chronic disease, Continuity of patient care, Disease management, General practice, Multimorbidity, Self-care",
author = "Kristensen, {Mads Aage Toft} and Due, {Tina Drud} and Bibi H{\o}lge-Hazelton and Guassora, {Ann Dorrit} and Waldorff, {Frans Boch}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.3399/bjgpopen18X101591",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
journal = "British Journal of General Practice Open ",
issn = "2398-3795",
publisher = " The Royal College of General Practitioners",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'More constricting than inspiring' - GPs find chronic care programmes of limited clinical utility. A qualitative study

AU - Kristensen, Mads Aage Toft

AU - Due, Tina Drud

AU - Hølge-Hazelton, Bibi

AU - Guassora, Ann Dorrit

AU - Waldorff, Frans Boch

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Background: As in other countries, Danish health authorities have introduced disease management programmes (DMPs) to improve care quality. These contain clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and guidelines for patient stratification based on doctors' assessments of disease severity and self-care. However, these programmes are challenged when patients have complex chronic conditions. Aim: To explore how GPs experience the clinical applicability of disease management programmes for patients with multiple chronic conditions and lowered self-care ability. Design & setting: A qualitative study from general practice, conducted in rural areas of Denmark with economically disadvantaged populations. Method: Data were collected through case-based, semi-structured interviews with 12 GPs. The principles of systematic text condensation were used in the analysis. Results: GPs found DMPs inadequate, particularly for patients with multiple conditions and lowered self-care ability. Their experience was that adhering to multiple programmes' CPGs resulted in too much medication, conflicting treatments, an overload of appointments, and fragmented health care. They disregarded stratifying according to guidelines because they deemed stratification criteria to reflect neither patients' need for self-care support, nor flexible referral options to hospitals and municipalities. Therefore, GPs were often solely responsible for treatment of patients with very complex chronic conditions. Conclusion: GPs found DMPs to be of limited clinical applicability due to challenges related to CPGs, patient stratification, and lack of adequate health services to support patients with complex healthcare needs. To increase the benefits of these programmes, they should be more flexible, and adjusted to the needs of patients with multiple chronic conditions and lowered self-care ability.

AB - Background: As in other countries, Danish health authorities have introduced disease management programmes (DMPs) to improve care quality. These contain clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and guidelines for patient stratification based on doctors' assessments of disease severity and self-care. However, these programmes are challenged when patients have complex chronic conditions. Aim: To explore how GPs experience the clinical applicability of disease management programmes for patients with multiple chronic conditions and lowered self-care ability. Design & setting: A qualitative study from general practice, conducted in rural areas of Denmark with economically disadvantaged populations. Method: Data were collected through case-based, semi-structured interviews with 12 GPs. The principles of systematic text condensation were used in the analysis. Results: GPs found DMPs inadequate, particularly for patients with multiple conditions and lowered self-care ability. Their experience was that adhering to multiple programmes' CPGs resulted in too much medication, conflicting treatments, an overload of appointments, and fragmented health care. They disregarded stratifying according to guidelines because they deemed stratification criteria to reflect neither patients' need for self-care support, nor flexible referral options to hospitals and municipalities. Therefore, GPs were often solely responsible for treatment of patients with very complex chronic conditions. Conclusion: GPs found DMPs to be of limited clinical applicability due to challenges related to CPGs, patient stratification, and lack of adequate health services to support patients with complex healthcare needs. To increase the benefits of these programmes, they should be more flexible, and adjusted to the needs of patients with multiple chronic conditions and lowered self-care ability.

KW - Chronic disease

KW - Continuity of patient care

KW - Disease management

KW - General practice

KW - Multimorbidity

KW - Self-care

U2 - 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101591

DO - 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101591

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2

JO - British Journal of General Practice Open

JF - British Journal of General Practice Open

SN - 2398-3795

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 240194713