Metodologiske udfordringer ved målinger af funktionsevne i gerontologisk forskning.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Metodologiske udfordringer ved målinger af funktionsevne i gerontologisk forskning. / Avlund, K.

I: Ugeskrift for læger, Bind 159, Nr. 43, 1997, s. 6353-8.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Avlund, K 1997, 'Metodologiske udfordringer ved målinger af funktionsevne i gerontologisk forskning.', Ugeskrift for læger, bind 159, nr. 43, s. 6353-8.

APA

Avlund, K. (1997). Metodologiske udfordringer ved målinger af funktionsevne i gerontologisk forskning. Ugeskrift for læger, 159(43), 6353-8.

Vancouver

Avlund K. Metodologiske udfordringer ved målinger af funktionsevne i gerontologisk forskning. Ugeskrift for læger. 1997;159(43):6353-8.

Author

Avlund, K. / Metodologiske udfordringer ved målinger af funktionsevne i gerontologisk forskning. I: Ugeskrift for læger. 1997 ; Bind 159, Nr. 43. s. 6353-8.

Bibtex

@article{ae68c84074ca11dbbee902004c4f4f50,
title = "Metodologiske udfordringer ved m{\aa}linger af funktionsevne i gerontologisk forskning.",
abstract = "This article addresses the advantages and disadvantages of different methods in measuring functional ability with its main focus on frame of reference, operationalization, practical procedure, validity, discriminatory power, and responsiveness. When measuring functional ability it is recommended: 1) Always to consider the theoretical frame of reference as part of the validation process. 2) Always to assess the content validity of items before they are combined into an index and before performing tests for construct validity. 3) Not to combine mobility, PADL and IADL in the same index/scale. 4) Not to use IADL as a health-related functional ability measure or, if used, to ask whether problems with IADL or non-performance of IADL are caused by health-related factors. 5) Always to analyse functional ability separately for men and women. 6) To exclude the dead in analyses of change in functional ability if the focus is on predictors of deterioration in functional ability. Udgivelsesdato: 1997-Oct-20",
author = "K Avlund",
note = "Keywords: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Female; Geriatric Assessment; Humans; Male; Research",
year = "1997",
language = "Dansk",
volume = "159",
pages = "6353--8",
journal = "Ugeskrift for Laeger",
issn = "0041-5782",
publisher = "Almindelige Danske Laegeforening",
number = "43",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metodologiske udfordringer ved målinger af funktionsevne i gerontologisk forskning.

AU - Avlund, K

N1 - Keywords: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Female; Geriatric Assessment; Humans; Male; Research

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - This article addresses the advantages and disadvantages of different methods in measuring functional ability with its main focus on frame of reference, operationalization, practical procedure, validity, discriminatory power, and responsiveness. When measuring functional ability it is recommended: 1) Always to consider the theoretical frame of reference as part of the validation process. 2) Always to assess the content validity of items before they are combined into an index and before performing tests for construct validity. 3) Not to combine mobility, PADL and IADL in the same index/scale. 4) Not to use IADL as a health-related functional ability measure or, if used, to ask whether problems with IADL or non-performance of IADL are caused by health-related factors. 5) Always to analyse functional ability separately for men and women. 6) To exclude the dead in analyses of change in functional ability if the focus is on predictors of deterioration in functional ability. Udgivelsesdato: 1997-Oct-20

AB - This article addresses the advantages and disadvantages of different methods in measuring functional ability with its main focus on frame of reference, operationalization, practical procedure, validity, discriminatory power, and responsiveness. When measuring functional ability it is recommended: 1) Always to consider the theoretical frame of reference as part of the validation process. 2) Always to assess the content validity of items before they are combined into an index and before performing tests for construct validity. 3) Not to combine mobility, PADL and IADL in the same index/scale. 4) Not to use IADL as a health-related functional ability measure or, if used, to ask whether problems with IADL or non-performance of IADL are caused by health-related factors. 5) Always to analyse functional ability separately for men and women. 6) To exclude the dead in analyses of change in functional ability if the focus is on predictors of deterioration in functional ability. Udgivelsesdato: 1997-Oct-20

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

C2 - 9411957

VL - 159

SP - 6353

EP - 6358

JO - Ugeskrift for Laeger

JF - Ugeskrift for Laeger

SN - 0041-5782

IS - 43

ER -

ID: 219616