Effect of postsurgical rehabilitation programmes in patients operated for lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Effect of postsurgical rehabilitation programmes in patients operated for lung cancer : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Sommer, Maja S.; Staerkind, Maja E. B.; Christensen, Jan; Vibe-Petersen, Jette; Larsen, Klaus R; Holst Pedersen, Jesper; Langberg, Henning.

I: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Bind 50, Nr. 3, 2018, s. 236-245.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Sommer, MS, Staerkind, MEB, Christensen, J, Vibe-Petersen, J, Larsen, KR, Holst Pedersen, J & Langberg, H 2018, 'Effect of postsurgical rehabilitation programmes in patients operated for lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis', Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, bind 50, nr. 3, s. 236-245. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2292

APA

Sommer, M. S., Staerkind, M. E. B., Christensen, J., Vibe-Petersen, J., Larsen, K. R., Holst Pedersen, J., & Langberg, H. (2018). Effect of postsurgical rehabilitation programmes in patients operated for lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 50(3), 236-245. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2292

Vancouver

Sommer MS, Staerkind MEB, Christensen J, Vibe-Petersen J, Larsen KR, Holst Pedersen J o.a. Effect of postsurgical rehabilitation programmes in patients operated for lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2018;50(3):236-245. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2292

Author

Sommer, Maja S. ; Staerkind, Maja E. B. ; Christensen, Jan ; Vibe-Petersen, Jette ; Larsen, Klaus R ; Holst Pedersen, Jesper ; Langberg, Henning. / Effect of postsurgical rehabilitation programmes in patients operated for lung cancer : A systematic review and meta-analysis. I: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2018 ; Bind 50, Nr. 3. s. 236-245.

Bibtex

@article{2abc2468e3af482eb803cc4177c7112f,
title = "Effect of postsurgical rehabilitation programmes in patients operated for lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence concerning the effects of postoperative exercise interventions on exercise capacity and health-related quality of life following resection for non-small cell lung cancer, and to review whether different initiation times of exercise produce different effects on exercise capacity.DATA SOURCES: Comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL and PEDro.STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials examining the effects of exercise interventions were eligible for inclusion.DATA EXTRACTION: Postoperative outcome measurements were extracted and the quality of evidence was graded using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group.DATA SYNTHESIS: Four randomized controlled trials were identified involving 262 participants. Short-term follow-up (12-20 weeks) showed significantly higher exercise capacity and physical component of health-related quality of life in the intervention group (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.48; 95{\%} confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.93) compared with the control group (SMD 0.50; 95{\%} CI 0.19-0.82). There was no difference between the effect of late- and early-initiated exercise intervention.CONCLUSION: Exercise has a small-to-moderate effect at short-term follow-up on exercise capacity and the physical component of health-related quality of life in patients operated for lung cancer. The long-term effects of exercise capacity are unknown. Early-initiated exercise programmes (2 weeks post-operation) did not show an effect on exercise capacity. These findings should be interpreted with caution.",
author = "Sommer, {Maja S.} and Staerkind, {Maja E. B.} and Jan Christensen and Jette Vibe-Petersen and Larsen, {Klaus R} and {Holst Pedersen}, Jesper and Henning Langberg",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.2340/16501977-2292",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "236--245",
journal = "Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine",
issn = "1650-1977",
publisher = "Foundation of Rehabilitation Information",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of postsurgical rehabilitation programmes in patients operated for lung cancer

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Sommer, Maja S.

AU - Staerkind, Maja E. B.

AU - Christensen, Jan

AU - Vibe-Petersen, Jette

AU - Larsen, Klaus R

AU - Holst Pedersen, Jesper

AU - Langberg, Henning

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence concerning the effects of postoperative exercise interventions on exercise capacity and health-related quality of life following resection for non-small cell lung cancer, and to review whether different initiation times of exercise produce different effects on exercise capacity.DATA SOURCES: Comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL and PEDro.STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials examining the effects of exercise interventions were eligible for inclusion.DATA EXTRACTION: Postoperative outcome measurements were extracted and the quality of evidence was graded using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group.DATA SYNTHESIS: Four randomized controlled trials were identified involving 262 participants. Short-term follow-up (12-20 weeks) showed significantly higher exercise capacity and physical component of health-related quality of life in the intervention group (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.93) compared with the control group (SMD 0.50; 95% CI 0.19-0.82). There was no difference between the effect of late- and early-initiated exercise intervention.CONCLUSION: Exercise has a small-to-moderate effect at short-term follow-up on exercise capacity and the physical component of health-related quality of life in patients operated for lung cancer. The long-term effects of exercise capacity are unknown. Early-initiated exercise programmes (2 weeks post-operation) did not show an effect on exercise capacity. These findings should be interpreted with caution.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence concerning the effects of postoperative exercise interventions on exercise capacity and health-related quality of life following resection for non-small cell lung cancer, and to review whether different initiation times of exercise produce different effects on exercise capacity.DATA SOURCES: Comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL and PEDro.STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials examining the effects of exercise interventions were eligible for inclusion.DATA EXTRACTION: Postoperative outcome measurements were extracted and the quality of evidence was graded using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group.DATA SYNTHESIS: Four randomized controlled trials were identified involving 262 participants. Short-term follow-up (12-20 weeks) showed significantly higher exercise capacity and physical component of health-related quality of life in the intervention group (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.93) compared with the control group (SMD 0.50; 95% CI 0.19-0.82). There was no difference between the effect of late- and early-initiated exercise intervention.CONCLUSION: Exercise has a small-to-moderate effect at short-term follow-up on exercise capacity and the physical component of health-related quality of life in patients operated for lung cancer. The long-term effects of exercise capacity are unknown. Early-initiated exercise programmes (2 weeks post-operation) did not show an effect on exercise capacity. These findings should be interpreted with caution.

U2 - 10.2340/16501977-2292

DO - 10.2340/16501977-2292

M3 - Review

C2 - 29392334

VL - 50

SP - 236

EP - 245

JO - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

SN - 1650-1977

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 195590935