Comparison of three infertility-specific measures in men and women going through assisted reproductive technology treatment

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Comparison of three infertility-specific measures in men and women going through assisted reproductive technology treatment. / Pedro, Juliana; Frederiksen, Yoon; Schmidt, Lone; Ingerslev, Hans J.; Zachariae, Robert ; Martins, Mariana V.

I: Journal of Health Psychology, Bind 24, Nr. 6, 01.05.2019, s. 738-749.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Pedro, J, Frederiksen, Y, Schmidt, L, Ingerslev, HJ, Zachariae, R & Martins, MV 2019, 'Comparison of three infertility-specific measures in men and women going through assisted reproductive technology treatment', Journal of Health Psychology, bind 24, nr. 6, s. 738-749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316678669

APA

Pedro, J., Frederiksen, Y., Schmidt, L., Ingerslev, H. J., Zachariae, R., & Martins, M. V. (2019). Comparison of three infertility-specific measures in men and women going through assisted reproductive technology treatment. Journal of Health Psychology, 24(6), 738-749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316678669

Vancouver

Pedro J, Frederiksen Y, Schmidt L, Ingerslev HJ, Zachariae R, Martins MV. Comparison of three infertility-specific measures in men and women going through assisted reproductive technology treatment. Journal of Health Psychology. 2019 maj 1;24(6):738-749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316678669

Author

Pedro, Juliana ; Frederiksen, Yoon ; Schmidt, Lone ; Ingerslev, Hans J. ; Zachariae, Robert ; Martins, Mariana V. / Comparison of three infertility-specific measures in men and women going through assisted reproductive technology treatment. I: Journal of Health Psychology. 2019 ; Bind 24, Nr. 6. s. 738-749.

Bibtex

@article{d7739bbbd3b347daa4b7e049f608845d,
title = "Comparison of three infertility-specific measures in men and women going through assisted reproductive technology treatment",
abstract = "We compared the psychometric properties of COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales, Fertility Problem Inventory, and Fertility Quality of Life Tool in 293 patients enrolled for assisted reproductive technology. COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales and Fertility Problem Inventory subscales presented higher internal consistency. COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales differentiated best between its domains. Fertility Problem Inventory revealed better concurrent validity. Fertility Quality of Life Tool presented betterfit. While discrimination for depression was similar between measures, Fertility Quality of Life Tool was better at discriminating anxiety. Results suggest that while all compared measures are reliable and valid inassessing the psychosocial adjustment to infertility, the choice of measure should be based according to the assessment goals.",
author = "Juliana Pedro and Yoon Frederiksen and Lone Schmidt and Ingerslev, {Hans J.} and Robert Zachariae and Martins, {Mariana V.}",
year = "2019",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1359105316678669",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "738--749",
journal = "Journal of Health Psychology",
issn = "1359-1053",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of three infertility-specific measures in men and women going through assisted reproductive technology treatment

AU - Pedro, Juliana

AU - Frederiksen, Yoon

AU - Schmidt, Lone

AU - Ingerslev, Hans J.

AU - Zachariae, Robert

AU - Martins, Mariana V.

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - We compared the psychometric properties of COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales, Fertility Problem Inventory, and Fertility Quality of Life Tool in 293 patients enrolled for assisted reproductive technology. COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales and Fertility Problem Inventory subscales presented higher internal consistency. COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales differentiated best between its domains. Fertility Problem Inventory revealed better concurrent validity. Fertility Quality of Life Tool presented betterfit. While discrimination for depression was similar between measures, Fertility Quality of Life Tool was better at discriminating anxiety. Results suggest that while all compared measures are reliable and valid inassessing the psychosocial adjustment to infertility, the choice of measure should be based according to the assessment goals.

AB - We compared the psychometric properties of COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales, Fertility Problem Inventory, and Fertility Quality of Life Tool in 293 patients enrolled for assisted reproductive technology. COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales and Fertility Problem Inventory subscales presented higher internal consistency. COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales differentiated best between its domains. Fertility Problem Inventory revealed better concurrent validity. Fertility Quality of Life Tool presented betterfit. While discrimination for depression was similar between measures, Fertility Quality of Life Tool was better at discriminating anxiety. Results suggest that while all compared measures are reliable and valid inassessing the psychosocial adjustment to infertility, the choice of measure should be based according to the assessment goals.

U2 - 10.1177/1359105316678669

DO - 10.1177/1359105316678669

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27881623

VL - 24

SP - 738

EP - 749

JO - Journal of Health Psychology

JF - Journal of Health Psychology

SN - 1359-1053

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 169357224