Comparison of physical behavior estimates from three different thigh-worn accelerometers brands: A proof-of-concept for the Prospective Physical Activity, Sitting, and Sleep consortium (ProPASS)
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Comparison of physical behavior estimates from three different thigh-worn accelerometers brands : A proof-of-concept for the Prospective Physical Activity, Sitting, and Sleep consortium (ProPASS). / Crowley, Patrick; Skotte, Jørgen; Stamatakis, Emmanuel; Hamer, Mark; Aadahl, Mette; Stevens, Matthew L.; Rangul, Vegar; Mork, Paul J.; Holtermann, Andreas.
I: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Bind 16, Nr. 1, 65, 2019.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of physical behavior estimates from three different thigh-worn accelerometers brands
T2 - A proof-of-concept for the Prospective Physical Activity, Sitting, and Sleep consortium (ProPASS)
AU - Crowley, Patrick
AU - Skotte, Jørgen
AU - Stamatakis, Emmanuel
AU - Hamer, Mark
AU - Aadahl, Mette
AU - Stevens, Matthew L.
AU - Rangul, Vegar
AU - Mork, Paul J.
AU - Holtermann, Andreas
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Background: Pooling data from thigh-worn accelerometers across multiple studies has great potential to advance evidence on the health benefits of physical activity. This requires harmonization of information on body postures, physical activity types, volumes and time patterns across different brands of devices. The aim of this study is to compare the physical behavior estimates provided by three different brands of thigh-worn accelerometers. Methods: Twenty participants volunteered for a 7-day free-living measurement. Three accelerometers - ActiGraph GT3X+, Axivity AX3 and ActivPAL Micro4 - were randomly placed in a vertical line on the midsection of the right thigh. Raw data from each accelerometer was processed and classified into 8 physical activities and postures using the Acti4 software. Absolute differences between estimates and the respective coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated. Results: We observed very minor differences between physical behavior estimates from three different accelerometer brands. When averaged over 24 h (1,440 min), the absolute difference (CV) between accelerometers were: 1.2 mins (0.001) for lying/sitting, 3.4 mins (0.02) for standing, 3.5 mins (0.06) for moving, 1.9 mins (0.03) for walking, 0.1 mins (0.19) for running, 1.2 mins (0.19) for stair climbing, 1.9 mins (0.07) for cycling. Moreover, there was an average absolute difference of 282 steps (0.03) per 24 h. Conclusions: Physical behaviors were classified with negligible difference between the accelerometer brands. These results support harmonization of data from different thigh-worn accelerometers across multiple cohorts when analyzed in an identical manner.
AB - Background: Pooling data from thigh-worn accelerometers across multiple studies has great potential to advance evidence on the health benefits of physical activity. This requires harmonization of information on body postures, physical activity types, volumes and time patterns across different brands of devices. The aim of this study is to compare the physical behavior estimates provided by three different brands of thigh-worn accelerometers. Methods: Twenty participants volunteered for a 7-day free-living measurement. Three accelerometers - ActiGraph GT3X+, Axivity AX3 and ActivPAL Micro4 - were randomly placed in a vertical line on the midsection of the right thigh. Raw data from each accelerometer was processed and classified into 8 physical activities and postures using the Acti4 software. Absolute differences between estimates and the respective coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated. Results: We observed very minor differences between physical behavior estimates from three different accelerometer brands. When averaged over 24 h (1,440 min), the absolute difference (CV) between accelerometers were: 1.2 mins (0.001) for lying/sitting, 3.4 mins (0.02) for standing, 3.5 mins (0.06) for moving, 1.9 mins (0.03) for walking, 0.1 mins (0.19) for running, 1.2 mins (0.19) for stair climbing, 1.9 mins (0.07) for cycling. Moreover, there was an average absolute difference of 282 steps (0.03) per 24 h. Conclusions: Physical behaviors were classified with negligible difference between the accelerometer brands. These results support harmonization of data from different thigh-worn accelerometers across multiple cohorts when analyzed in an identical manner.
KW - Accelerometry
KW - Data pooling
KW - Harmonization
KW - Health
KW - Objective measurement
KW - Posture
KW - Tri-axial
KW - Validation
U2 - 10.1186/s12966-019-0835-0
DO - 10.1186/s12966-019-0835-0
M3 - Review
C2 - 31419998
AN - SCOPUS:85070893330
VL - 16
JO - International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
JF - International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
SN - 1479-5868
IS - 1
M1 - 65
ER -
ID: 242207061