Disentangling concepts of inappropriate polypharmacy in old age: A scoping review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikel

Standard

Disentangling concepts of inappropriate polypharmacy in old age : A scoping review. / Lau, Sofie Rosenlund; Waldorff, Frans Boch; Andersen, John Sahl; Hølmkjær, Pernille.

I: BMC Public Health, Bind 23, 245, 2023.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikel

Harvard

Lau, SR, Waldorff, FB, Andersen, JS & Hølmkjær, P 2023, 'Disentangling concepts of inappropriate polypharmacy in old age: A scoping review', BMC Public Health, bind 23, 245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15013-2

APA

Lau, S. R., Waldorff, F. B., Andersen, J. S., & Hølmkjær, P. (2023). Disentangling concepts of inappropriate polypharmacy in old age: A scoping review. BMC Public Health, 23, [245]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15013-2

Vancouver

Lau SR, Waldorff FB, Andersen JS, Hølmkjær P. Disentangling concepts of inappropriate polypharmacy in old age: A scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2023;23. 245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15013-2

Author

Lau, Sofie Rosenlund ; Waldorff, Frans Boch ; Andersen, John Sahl ; Hølmkjær, Pernille. / Disentangling concepts of inappropriate polypharmacy in old age : A scoping review. I: BMC Public Health. 2023 ; Bind 23.

Bibtex

@article{9cba3a34498744fd8eacbe8de68903bb,
title = "Disentangling concepts of inappropriate polypharmacy in old age: A scoping review",
abstract = "IntroductionPolypharmacy is a common concern, especially in the older population. In some countries more that 50% of all individuals over 60 receive five or more drugs, most often due to multimorbidity and increased longevity. However, polypharmacy is associated with multiple adverse events, and more medication may not always be the answer. The terms “appropriate” and “inappropriate” are often used to distinguish between “much” and “too much” medications in relation to polypharmacy in research and practice, but no explicit definition exists to describe what these terms encompass. The aim of this review is to unfold the different understandings of and perspectives on (in)appropriate polypharmacy and suggest a framework for further research and practice.MethodA scoping review was conducted using the framework of Arksey and O{\textquoteright}Malley and Levac et al. Pubmed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane database, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for references in English, Danish, Norwegian and Swedish using the search string “Polypharmacy” AND “Appropriate” OR “Inappropriate”. Data was extracted on author information, aims and objectives, methodology, study population and setting, country of origin, main findings and implications, and all text including the words “appropriate,” “inappropriate,” and “polypharmacy.” Qualitative meaning condensation analysis was used and data charted using descriptive and thematic analysis.ResultsOf 3982 references, a total of 92 references were included in the review. Most references were from 2016-2021, from fields related to medicine or pharmacy, and occurred within primary and secondary healthcare settings. Based on the qualitative analysis, a framework were assembled consisting of Context, three domains (Standardization, Practices and Values & Concerns) and Patient Perspective.ConclusionInappropriate polypharmacy is a concept loaded by its heterogeneity and the usefulness of a single definition is doubtful. Instead, the framework suggested in this article representing different dimensions of inappropriate polypharmacy may serve as an initial strategy for focusing research and practice on polypharmacy in old age",
author = "Lau, {Sofie Rosenlund} and Waldorff, {Frans Boch} and Andersen, {John Sahl} and Pernille H{\o}lmkj{\ae}r",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1186/s12889-023-15013-2",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disentangling concepts of inappropriate polypharmacy in old age

T2 - A scoping review

AU - Lau, Sofie Rosenlund

AU - Waldorff, Frans Boch

AU - Andersen, John Sahl

AU - Hølmkjær, Pernille

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - IntroductionPolypharmacy is a common concern, especially in the older population. In some countries more that 50% of all individuals over 60 receive five or more drugs, most often due to multimorbidity and increased longevity. However, polypharmacy is associated with multiple adverse events, and more medication may not always be the answer. The terms “appropriate” and “inappropriate” are often used to distinguish between “much” and “too much” medications in relation to polypharmacy in research and practice, but no explicit definition exists to describe what these terms encompass. The aim of this review is to unfold the different understandings of and perspectives on (in)appropriate polypharmacy and suggest a framework for further research and practice.MethodA scoping review was conducted using the framework of Arksey and O’Malley and Levac et al. Pubmed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane database, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for references in English, Danish, Norwegian and Swedish using the search string “Polypharmacy” AND “Appropriate” OR “Inappropriate”. Data was extracted on author information, aims and objectives, methodology, study population and setting, country of origin, main findings and implications, and all text including the words “appropriate,” “inappropriate,” and “polypharmacy.” Qualitative meaning condensation analysis was used and data charted using descriptive and thematic analysis.ResultsOf 3982 references, a total of 92 references were included in the review. Most references were from 2016-2021, from fields related to medicine or pharmacy, and occurred within primary and secondary healthcare settings. Based on the qualitative analysis, a framework were assembled consisting of Context, three domains (Standardization, Practices and Values & Concerns) and Patient Perspective.ConclusionInappropriate polypharmacy is a concept loaded by its heterogeneity and the usefulness of a single definition is doubtful. Instead, the framework suggested in this article representing different dimensions of inappropriate polypharmacy may serve as an initial strategy for focusing research and practice on polypharmacy in old age

AB - IntroductionPolypharmacy is a common concern, especially in the older population. In some countries more that 50% of all individuals over 60 receive five or more drugs, most often due to multimorbidity and increased longevity. However, polypharmacy is associated with multiple adverse events, and more medication may not always be the answer. The terms “appropriate” and “inappropriate” are often used to distinguish between “much” and “too much” medications in relation to polypharmacy in research and practice, but no explicit definition exists to describe what these terms encompass. The aim of this review is to unfold the different understandings of and perspectives on (in)appropriate polypharmacy and suggest a framework for further research and practice.MethodA scoping review was conducted using the framework of Arksey and O’Malley and Levac et al. Pubmed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane database, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for references in English, Danish, Norwegian and Swedish using the search string “Polypharmacy” AND “Appropriate” OR “Inappropriate”. Data was extracted on author information, aims and objectives, methodology, study population and setting, country of origin, main findings and implications, and all text including the words “appropriate,” “inappropriate,” and “polypharmacy.” Qualitative meaning condensation analysis was used and data charted using descriptive and thematic analysis.ResultsOf 3982 references, a total of 92 references were included in the review. Most references were from 2016-2021, from fields related to medicine or pharmacy, and occurred within primary and secondary healthcare settings. Based on the qualitative analysis, a framework were assembled consisting of Context, three domains (Standardization, Practices and Values & Concerns) and Patient Perspective.ConclusionInappropriate polypharmacy is a concept loaded by its heterogeneity and the usefulness of a single definition is doubtful. Instead, the framework suggested in this article representing different dimensions of inappropriate polypharmacy may serve as an initial strategy for focusing research and practice on polypharmacy in old age

U2 - 10.1186/s12889-023-15013-2

DO - 10.1186/s12889-023-15013-2

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36739368

VL - 23

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

M1 - 245

ER -

ID: 305870736