Spiritual Care in General Practice: Rushing in or Fearing to Tread? An Integrative Review of Qualitative Literature

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Spiritual Care in General Practice : Rushing in or Fearing to Tread? An Integrative Review of Qualitative Literature. / Appleby, Alistair; Wilson, Philip; Swinton, John.

I: Journal of Religion and Health, Bind 57, Nr. 3, 2018, s. 1108-1124.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Appleby, A, Wilson, P & Swinton, J 2018, 'Spiritual Care in General Practice: Rushing in or Fearing to Tread? An Integrative Review of Qualitative Literature', Journal of Religion and Health, bind 57, nr. 3, s. 1108-1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0581-7

APA

Appleby, A., Wilson, P., & Swinton, J. (2018). Spiritual Care in General Practice: Rushing in or Fearing to Tread? An Integrative Review of Qualitative Literature. Journal of Religion and Health, 57(3), 1108-1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0581-7

Vancouver

Appleby A, Wilson P, Swinton J. Spiritual Care in General Practice: Rushing in or Fearing to Tread? An Integrative Review of Qualitative Literature. Journal of Religion and Health. 2018;57(3):1108-1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0581-7

Author

Appleby, Alistair ; Wilson, Philip ; Swinton, John. / Spiritual Care in General Practice : Rushing in or Fearing to Tread? An Integrative Review of Qualitative Literature. I: Journal of Religion and Health. 2018 ; Bind 57, Nr. 3. s. 1108-1124.

Bibtex

@article{9a175b0268a5484abdff83942857dac7,
title = "Spiritual Care in General Practice: Rushing in or Fearing to Tread? An Integrative Review of Qualitative Literature",
abstract = "Guidance for medical staff reminds employees of the responsibility to deliver spiritual care in its broadest sense, respecting the dignity, humanity, individuality and diversity of the people whose cultures, faiths and beliefs coexist in society. This is no small or simple task, and although GPs (family practitioners) have been encouraged to deliver spiritual care, we suggest this is proving to be challenging and needs further careful debate. This literature review critiques and analyses existing studies and points to four categories of attitude to spiritual care, and two related but distinct concepts of spirituality in use by GPs. Our aims were to search for, summarise and critique the qualitative literature regarding general practitioners' views on spirituality and their role in relation to spiritual care. An integrative review was made by a multidisciplinary team using a critical realism framework. We searched seven databases and completed thematic and matrix analyses of the qualitative literature. A number of good-quality studies exist and show that some but not all GPs are willing to offer spiritual care. Four patterns of attitude towards delivering spiritual care emerge from the studies which indicate different levels of engagement with spiritual care: embracing, pragmatic, guarded and rejecting. Further research is needed to identify whether these four views are fixed or fluid, whether training in spiritual care modifies these and whether they relate to patterns of care in practice, or patient outcomes. The authors suggest that some of the difference in viewpoint relate to the lack of clear philosophical framework. The authors suggest critical realism as having potential to facilitate interdisciplinary research and create clearer concepts of spiritual care for GPs.",
keywords = "Attitude of Health Personnel, Delivery of Health Care, Fear, General Practice, General Practitioners/psychology, Humans, Physician's Role/psychology, Physician-Patient Relations, Primary Health Care, Religion, Spirituality",
author = "Alistair Appleby and Philip Wilson and John Swinton",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/s10943-018-0581-7",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "1108--1124",
journal = "Journal of Religion and Health",
issn = "0022-4197",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spiritual Care in General Practice

T2 - Rushing in or Fearing to Tread? An Integrative Review of Qualitative Literature

AU - Appleby, Alistair

AU - Wilson, Philip

AU - Swinton, John

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Guidance for medical staff reminds employees of the responsibility to deliver spiritual care in its broadest sense, respecting the dignity, humanity, individuality and diversity of the people whose cultures, faiths and beliefs coexist in society. This is no small or simple task, and although GPs (family practitioners) have been encouraged to deliver spiritual care, we suggest this is proving to be challenging and needs further careful debate. This literature review critiques and analyses existing studies and points to four categories of attitude to spiritual care, and two related but distinct concepts of spirituality in use by GPs. Our aims were to search for, summarise and critique the qualitative literature regarding general practitioners' views on spirituality and their role in relation to spiritual care. An integrative review was made by a multidisciplinary team using a critical realism framework. We searched seven databases and completed thematic and matrix analyses of the qualitative literature. A number of good-quality studies exist and show that some but not all GPs are willing to offer spiritual care. Four patterns of attitude towards delivering spiritual care emerge from the studies which indicate different levels of engagement with spiritual care: embracing, pragmatic, guarded and rejecting. Further research is needed to identify whether these four views are fixed or fluid, whether training in spiritual care modifies these and whether they relate to patterns of care in practice, or patient outcomes. The authors suggest that some of the difference in viewpoint relate to the lack of clear philosophical framework. The authors suggest critical realism as having potential to facilitate interdisciplinary research and create clearer concepts of spiritual care for GPs.

AB - Guidance for medical staff reminds employees of the responsibility to deliver spiritual care in its broadest sense, respecting the dignity, humanity, individuality and diversity of the people whose cultures, faiths and beliefs coexist in society. This is no small or simple task, and although GPs (family practitioners) have been encouraged to deliver spiritual care, we suggest this is proving to be challenging and needs further careful debate. This literature review critiques and analyses existing studies and points to four categories of attitude to spiritual care, and two related but distinct concepts of spirituality in use by GPs. Our aims were to search for, summarise and critique the qualitative literature regarding general practitioners' views on spirituality and their role in relation to spiritual care. An integrative review was made by a multidisciplinary team using a critical realism framework. We searched seven databases and completed thematic and matrix analyses of the qualitative literature. A number of good-quality studies exist and show that some but not all GPs are willing to offer spiritual care. Four patterns of attitude towards delivering spiritual care emerge from the studies which indicate different levels of engagement with spiritual care: embracing, pragmatic, guarded and rejecting. Further research is needed to identify whether these four views are fixed or fluid, whether training in spiritual care modifies these and whether they relate to patterns of care in practice, or patient outcomes. The authors suggest that some of the difference in viewpoint relate to the lack of clear philosophical framework. The authors suggest critical realism as having potential to facilitate interdisciplinary research and create clearer concepts of spiritual care for GPs.

KW - Attitude of Health Personnel

KW - Delivery of Health Care

KW - Fear

KW - General Practice

KW - General Practitioners/psychology

KW - Humans

KW - Physician's Role/psychology

KW - Physician-Patient Relations

KW - Primary Health Care

KW - Religion

KW - Spirituality

U2 - 10.1007/s10943-018-0581-7

DO - 10.1007/s10943-018-0581-7

M3 - Review

C2 - 29476299

VL - 57

SP - 1108

EP - 1124

JO - Journal of Religion and Health

JF - Journal of Religion and Health

SN - 0022-4197

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 217944520