Reliability and construct validity of a new Danish translation of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire in a population of Danish amputees

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Reliability and construct validity of a new Danish translation of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire in a population of Danish amputees. / Christensen, Jan; Doherty, Patrick; Bjorner, Jakob Bue; Langberg, Henning.

I: Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Bind 41, Nr. 5, 01.10.2017, s. 469-475.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Christensen, J, Doherty, P, Bjorner, JB & Langberg, H 2017, 'Reliability and construct validity of a new Danish translation of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire in a population of Danish amputees', Prosthetics and Orthotics International, bind 41, nr. 5, s. 469-475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364616682387

APA

Christensen, J., Doherty, P., Bjorner, J. B., & Langberg, H. (2017). Reliability and construct validity of a new Danish translation of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire in a population of Danish amputees. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 41(5), 469-475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364616682387

Vancouver

Christensen J, Doherty P, Bjorner JB, Langberg H. Reliability and construct validity of a new Danish translation of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire in a population of Danish amputees. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 2017 okt. 1;41(5):469-475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364616682387

Author

Christensen, Jan ; Doherty, Patrick ; Bjorner, Jakob Bue ; Langberg, Henning. / Reliability and construct validity of a new Danish translation of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire in a population of Danish amputees. I: Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 2017 ; Bind 41, Nr. 5. s. 469-475.

Bibtex

@article{dbfc48296c564ffbb0a4a389181f655b,
title = "Reliability and construct validity of a new Danish translation of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire in a population of Danish amputees",
abstract = "Background:Most amputees live with their prostheses for a long time. Therefore, quality of life is an important outcome for lower limb amputees.Objective:To translate the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) and evaluate psychometric properties.Study Design:Methodological research.Methods:Lower limb amputees responded to electronic versions of the PEQ and SF-36v2 at baseline (n=64), after two weeks (n=51), and after 12 weeks (n=50). Reliability was assessed using Cronbach{\textquoteright}s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analyses of the baseline and two weeks test-retest data. Estimates for standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated based on reliability estimates. Construct validity was evaluated by testing using hypotheses testing.Results:Reliability estimates (ICC/Cronbach{\textquoteright}s alpha) for the nine subscales were: Social Burden (0.85/0.76), Appearance (0.85/0.72), Residual Limb Health (0.80/0.69), Well-Being (0.78/0.90), Utility (0.76/0.89), Frustration (0.74/0.90), Perceived Response (0.62/0.80), Ambulation (0.61/0.94), Sounds (0.51/0.65). Construct validity was supported in three out of four subscales evaluated.Conclusions:The subscales Social Burden, Appearance, Well-Being, Utility and Frustration had consistent high reliability, supporting their use in assessing the prosthesis related quality of life in lower limb amputees. Results were mixed on three other scales (Residual Limb Health, Perceived Response, and Ambulation), while one scale, Sounds, had consistent low reliability.Clinical relevance:For the first time a patient reported disease specific quality of life measure for lower limb amputees is available in Danish. Health care providers can now identify patients with reduced quality of life and measure treatment and rehabilitation effects over time.",
keywords = "Rehabilitation of amputees, rehabilitation, physiotherapy, rehabilitation of prostheses users",
author = "Jan Christensen and Patrick Doherty and Bjorner, {Jakob Bue} and Henning Langberg",
year = "2017",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0309364616682387",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "469--475",
journal = "Prosthetics and Orthotics International",
issn = "0309-3646",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and construct validity of a new Danish translation of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire in a population of Danish amputees

AU - Christensen, Jan

AU - Doherty, Patrick

AU - Bjorner, Jakob Bue

AU - Langberg, Henning

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Background:Most amputees live with their prostheses for a long time. Therefore, quality of life is an important outcome for lower limb amputees.Objective:To translate the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) and evaluate psychometric properties.Study Design:Methodological research.Methods:Lower limb amputees responded to electronic versions of the PEQ and SF-36v2 at baseline (n=64), after two weeks (n=51), and after 12 weeks (n=50). Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analyses of the baseline and two weeks test-retest data. Estimates for standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated based on reliability estimates. Construct validity was evaluated by testing using hypotheses testing.Results:Reliability estimates (ICC/Cronbach’s alpha) for the nine subscales were: Social Burden (0.85/0.76), Appearance (0.85/0.72), Residual Limb Health (0.80/0.69), Well-Being (0.78/0.90), Utility (0.76/0.89), Frustration (0.74/0.90), Perceived Response (0.62/0.80), Ambulation (0.61/0.94), Sounds (0.51/0.65). Construct validity was supported in three out of four subscales evaluated.Conclusions:The subscales Social Burden, Appearance, Well-Being, Utility and Frustration had consistent high reliability, supporting their use in assessing the prosthesis related quality of life in lower limb amputees. Results were mixed on three other scales (Residual Limb Health, Perceived Response, and Ambulation), while one scale, Sounds, had consistent low reliability.Clinical relevance:For the first time a patient reported disease specific quality of life measure for lower limb amputees is available in Danish. Health care providers can now identify patients with reduced quality of life and measure treatment and rehabilitation effects over time.

AB - Background:Most amputees live with their prostheses for a long time. Therefore, quality of life is an important outcome for lower limb amputees.Objective:To translate the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) and evaluate psychometric properties.Study Design:Methodological research.Methods:Lower limb amputees responded to electronic versions of the PEQ and SF-36v2 at baseline (n=64), after two weeks (n=51), and after 12 weeks (n=50). Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analyses of the baseline and two weeks test-retest data. Estimates for standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated based on reliability estimates. Construct validity was evaluated by testing using hypotheses testing.Results:Reliability estimates (ICC/Cronbach’s alpha) for the nine subscales were: Social Burden (0.85/0.76), Appearance (0.85/0.72), Residual Limb Health (0.80/0.69), Well-Being (0.78/0.90), Utility (0.76/0.89), Frustration (0.74/0.90), Perceived Response (0.62/0.80), Ambulation (0.61/0.94), Sounds (0.51/0.65). Construct validity was supported in three out of four subscales evaluated.Conclusions:The subscales Social Burden, Appearance, Well-Being, Utility and Frustration had consistent high reliability, supporting their use in assessing the prosthesis related quality of life in lower limb amputees. Results were mixed on three other scales (Residual Limb Health, Perceived Response, and Ambulation), while one scale, Sounds, had consistent low reliability.Clinical relevance:For the first time a patient reported disease specific quality of life measure for lower limb amputees is available in Danish. Health care providers can now identify patients with reduced quality of life and measure treatment and rehabilitation effects over time.

KW - Rehabilitation of amputees

KW - rehabilitation

KW - physiotherapy

KW - rehabilitation of prostheses users

U2 - 10.1177/0309364616682387

DO - 10.1177/0309364616682387

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 28946825

VL - 41

SP - 469

EP - 475

JO - Prosthetics and Orthotics International

JF - Prosthetics and Orthotics International

SN - 0309-3646

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 187012072