Patients' preference for exercise setting and its influence on the health benefits gained from exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Patients' preference for exercise setting and its influence on the health benefits gained from exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation. / Tang, Lars H.; Berg, Selina Kikkenborg; Christensen, Jan; Lawaetz, Jannik; Doherty, Patrick; Taylor, Rod S.; Langberg, Henning; Zwisler, Ann Dorthe.

I: International Journal of Cardiology, Bind 232, 01.04.2017, s. 33-39.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Tang, LH, Berg, SK, Christensen, J, Lawaetz, J, Doherty, P, Taylor, RS, Langberg, H & Zwisler, AD 2017, 'Patients' preference for exercise setting and its influence on the health benefits gained from exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation', International Journal of Cardiology, bind 232, s. 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.126

APA

Tang, L. H., Berg, S. K., Christensen, J., Lawaetz, J., Doherty, P., Taylor, R. S., Langberg, H., & Zwisler, A. D. (2017). Patients' preference for exercise setting and its influence on the health benefits gained from exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation. International Journal of Cardiology, 232, 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.126

Vancouver

Tang LH, Berg SK, Christensen J, Lawaetz J, Doherty P, Taylor RS o.a. Patients' preference for exercise setting and its influence on the health benefits gained from exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation. International Journal of Cardiology. 2017 apr. 1;232:33-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.126

Author

Tang, Lars H. ; Berg, Selina Kikkenborg ; Christensen, Jan ; Lawaetz, Jannik ; Doherty, Patrick ; Taylor, Rod S. ; Langberg, Henning ; Zwisler, Ann Dorthe. / Patients' preference for exercise setting and its influence on the health benefits gained from exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation. I: International Journal of Cardiology. 2017 ; Bind 232. s. 33-39.

Bibtex

@article{bd3115b737fc4b0b90d0a84f84021666,
title = "Patients' preference for exercise setting and its influence on the health benefits gained from exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To assess patient preference for exercise setting and examine if choice of setting influences the long-term health benefit of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation.METHODS: Patients participating in a randomised controlled trial following either heart valve surgery, or radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation were given the choice to perform a 12-week exercise programme in either a supervised centre-based, or a self-management home-based setting. Exercise capacity and physical and mental health outcomes were assessed for up to 24months after hospital discharge. Outcomes between settings were compared using a time×setting interaction using a mixed effects regression model.RESULTS: Across the 158 included patients, an equivalent proportion preferred to undertake exercise rehabilitation in a centre-based setting (55%, 95% CI: 45% to 63%) compared to a home-based setting (45%, 95% CI: 37% to 53%, p=0.233). At baseline, those who preferred a home-based setting reported better physical health (mean difference in physical component score: 5.0, 95% CI 2.3 to 7.4; p=0.001) and higher exercise capacity (mean between group difference 15.9watts, 95% CI 3.7 to 28.1; p=0.011). With the exception of the depression score in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (F(3.65), p=0.004), there was no evidence of a significant difference in outcomes between settings.CONCLUSION: The preference of patients to participate in home-based and centre-based exercise programmes appears to be equivalent and provides similar health benefits. Whilst these findings support that patients should be given the choice between exercise-settings when initiating cardiac rehabilitation, further confirmatory evidence is needed.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Tang, {Lars H.} and Berg, {Selina Kikkenborg} and Jan Christensen and Jannik Lawaetz and Patrick Doherty and Taylor, {Rod S.} and Henning Langberg and Zwisler, {Ann Dorthe}",
note = "Copyright {\^A}{\textcopyright} 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2017",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.126",
language = "English",
volume = "232",
pages = "33--39",
journal = "International Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0167-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patients' preference for exercise setting and its influence on the health benefits gained from exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation

AU - Tang, Lars H.

AU - Berg, Selina Kikkenborg

AU - Christensen, Jan

AU - Lawaetz, Jannik

AU - Doherty, Patrick

AU - Taylor, Rod S.

AU - Langberg, Henning

AU - Zwisler, Ann Dorthe

N1 - Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To assess patient preference for exercise setting and examine if choice of setting influences the long-term health benefit of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation.METHODS: Patients participating in a randomised controlled trial following either heart valve surgery, or radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation were given the choice to perform a 12-week exercise programme in either a supervised centre-based, or a self-management home-based setting. Exercise capacity and physical and mental health outcomes were assessed for up to 24months after hospital discharge. Outcomes between settings were compared using a time×setting interaction using a mixed effects regression model.RESULTS: Across the 158 included patients, an equivalent proportion preferred to undertake exercise rehabilitation in a centre-based setting (55%, 95% CI: 45% to 63%) compared to a home-based setting (45%, 95% CI: 37% to 53%, p=0.233). At baseline, those who preferred a home-based setting reported better physical health (mean difference in physical component score: 5.0, 95% CI 2.3 to 7.4; p=0.001) and higher exercise capacity (mean between group difference 15.9watts, 95% CI 3.7 to 28.1; p=0.011). With the exception of the depression score in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (F(3.65), p=0.004), there was no evidence of a significant difference in outcomes between settings.CONCLUSION: The preference of patients to participate in home-based and centre-based exercise programmes appears to be equivalent and provides similar health benefits. Whilst these findings support that patients should be given the choice between exercise-settings when initiating cardiac rehabilitation, further confirmatory evidence is needed.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To assess patient preference for exercise setting and examine if choice of setting influences the long-term health benefit of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation.METHODS: Patients participating in a randomised controlled trial following either heart valve surgery, or radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation were given the choice to perform a 12-week exercise programme in either a supervised centre-based, or a self-management home-based setting. Exercise capacity and physical and mental health outcomes were assessed for up to 24months after hospital discharge. Outcomes between settings were compared using a time×setting interaction using a mixed effects regression model.RESULTS: Across the 158 included patients, an equivalent proportion preferred to undertake exercise rehabilitation in a centre-based setting (55%, 95% CI: 45% to 63%) compared to a home-based setting (45%, 95% CI: 37% to 53%, p=0.233). At baseline, those who preferred a home-based setting reported better physical health (mean difference in physical component score: 5.0, 95% CI 2.3 to 7.4; p=0.001) and higher exercise capacity (mean between group difference 15.9watts, 95% CI 3.7 to 28.1; p=0.011). With the exception of the depression score in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (F(3.65), p=0.004), there was no evidence of a significant difference in outcomes between settings.CONCLUSION: The preference of patients to participate in home-based and centre-based exercise programmes appears to be equivalent and provides similar health benefits. Whilst these findings support that patients should be given the choice between exercise-settings when initiating cardiac rehabilitation, further confirmatory evidence is needed.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.126

DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.126

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 28159358

VL - 232

SP - 33

EP - 39

JO - International Journal of Cardiology

JF - International Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0167-5273

ER -

ID: 173737993