Interpretation as luxury: Heart patients living with data doubt, hope and anxiety

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Standard

Interpretation as luxury : Heart patients living with data doubt, hope and anxiety. / Lomborg, Stine; Langstrup, Henriette; Andersen, Tariq Osman.

I: Big Data & Society, Bind 7, Nr. 1, 2020.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Lomborg, S, Langstrup, H & Andersen, TO 2020, 'Interpretation as luxury: Heart patients living with data doubt, hope and anxiety', Big Data & Society, bind 7, nr. 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720924436

APA

Lomborg, S., Langstrup, H., & Andersen, T. O. (2020). Interpretation as luxury: Heart patients living with data doubt, hope and anxiety. Big Data & Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720924436

Vancouver

Lomborg S, Langstrup H, Andersen TO. Interpretation as luxury: Heart patients living with data doubt, hope and anxiety. Big Data & Society. 2020;7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720924436

Author

Lomborg, Stine ; Langstrup, Henriette ; Andersen, Tariq Osman. / Interpretation as luxury : Heart patients living with data doubt, hope and anxiety. I: Big Data & Society. 2020 ; Bind 7, Nr. 1.

Bibtex

@article{f95f3c5bee52477c832bec994f6a4447,
title = "Interpretation as luxury: Heart patients living with data doubt, hope and anxiety",
abstract = "Personal health technologies such as apps and wearables that generate health and behavior data close to the individual patient are envisioned to enable personalized healthcare - and self-care. And yet, they are consumer devices. Proponents of these devices presuppose that measuring will be helpful, and that data will be meaningful. However, a growing body of research suggests that self-tracking data does not necessarily make sense to users. Drawing together data studies and digital health research, we aim to further research on data ambivalence, a term we use to refer to the ambiguities and uncertainties people experience when interpreting their own data, as well as the critical obligation towards cultivating ethically sound uses and responses to such data in context. We develop the relationship between data, interpretation, and context as a central theoretical and practical problem in the datafication of healthcare. We then show how interpretation and context matter for data ambivalence through an empirical study of heart patients with an implanted advanced pacemaker who were offered a Fitbit wristband for self-tracking as part of a research project. We argue that the hope, anxiety, and doubt connected to the promise and accuracy of data are tempered by the context and purpose of self-tracking, and by individual circumstances. Finally, we link the findings on context-sensitivity in data interpretation to questions about response-ability in cloud-based care infrastructures. We discuss the ethical dilemmas associated with the use of commercial wellness-technologies in healthcare, and with researching such emerging practices.",
author = "Stine Lomborg and Henriette Langstrup and Andersen, {Tariq Osman}",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1177/2053951720924436",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "Big Data & Society",
issn = "2053-9517",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpretation as luxury

T2 - Heart patients living with data doubt, hope and anxiety

AU - Lomborg, Stine

AU - Langstrup, Henriette

AU - Andersen, Tariq Osman

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Personal health technologies such as apps and wearables that generate health and behavior data close to the individual patient are envisioned to enable personalized healthcare - and self-care. And yet, they are consumer devices. Proponents of these devices presuppose that measuring will be helpful, and that data will be meaningful. However, a growing body of research suggests that self-tracking data does not necessarily make sense to users. Drawing together data studies and digital health research, we aim to further research on data ambivalence, a term we use to refer to the ambiguities and uncertainties people experience when interpreting their own data, as well as the critical obligation towards cultivating ethically sound uses and responses to such data in context. We develop the relationship between data, interpretation, and context as a central theoretical and practical problem in the datafication of healthcare. We then show how interpretation and context matter for data ambivalence through an empirical study of heart patients with an implanted advanced pacemaker who were offered a Fitbit wristband for self-tracking as part of a research project. We argue that the hope, anxiety, and doubt connected to the promise and accuracy of data are tempered by the context and purpose of self-tracking, and by individual circumstances. Finally, we link the findings on context-sensitivity in data interpretation to questions about response-ability in cloud-based care infrastructures. We discuss the ethical dilemmas associated with the use of commercial wellness-technologies in healthcare, and with researching such emerging practices.

AB - Personal health technologies such as apps and wearables that generate health and behavior data close to the individual patient are envisioned to enable personalized healthcare - and self-care. And yet, they are consumer devices. Proponents of these devices presuppose that measuring will be helpful, and that data will be meaningful. However, a growing body of research suggests that self-tracking data does not necessarily make sense to users. Drawing together data studies and digital health research, we aim to further research on data ambivalence, a term we use to refer to the ambiguities and uncertainties people experience when interpreting their own data, as well as the critical obligation towards cultivating ethically sound uses and responses to such data in context. We develop the relationship between data, interpretation, and context as a central theoretical and practical problem in the datafication of healthcare. We then show how interpretation and context matter for data ambivalence through an empirical study of heart patients with an implanted advanced pacemaker who were offered a Fitbit wristband for self-tracking as part of a research project. We argue that the hope, anxiety, and doubt connected to the promise and accuracy of data are tempered by the context and purpose of self-tracking, and by individual circumstances. Finally, we link the findings on context-sensitivity in data interpretation to questions about response-ability in cloud-based care infrastructures. We discuss the ethical dilemmas associated with the use of commercial wellness-technologies in healthcare, and with researching such emerging practices.

U2 - 10.1177/2053951720924436

DO - 10.1177/2053951720924436

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

JO - Big Data & Society

JF - Big Data & Society

SN - 2053-9517

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 239445398