Implications of Non-Specific Effects for Testing, Approving, and Regulating Vaccines
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Implications of Non-Specific Effects for Testing, Approving, and Regulating Vaccines. / Benn, Christine Stabell; Amenyogbe, Nelly; Bjorkman, Anders; Dominguez-Andres, Jorge; Fish, Eleanor N.; Flanagan, Katie L.; Klein, Sabra L.; Kollmann, Tobias R.; Kyvik, Kirsten Ohm; Netea, Mihai G.; Rod, Naja Hulvej; Schaltz-Buchholzer, Frederik; Shann, Frank; Selin, Liisa; Thysen, Sanne M.; Aaby, Peter.
I: Drug Safety, Bind 46, 2023, s. 439-448.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Implications of Non-Specific Effects for Testing, Approving, and Regulating Vaccines
AU - Benn, Christine Stabell
AU - Amenyogbe, Nelly
AU - Bjorkman, Anders
AU - Dominguez-Andres, Jorge
AU - Fish, Eleanor N.
AU - Flanagan, Katie L.
AU - Klein, Sabra L.
AU - Kollmann, Tobias R.
AU - Kyvik, Kirsten Ohm
AU - Netea, Mihai G.
AU - Rod, Naja Hulvej
AU - Schaltz-Buchholzer, Frederik
AU - Shann, Frank
AU - Selin, Liisa
AU - Thysen, Sanne M.
AU - Aaby, Peter
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - The current framework for testing and regulating vaccines was established before the realization that vaccines, in addition to their effect against the vaccine-specific disease, may also have "non-specific effects" affecting the risk of unrelated diseases. Accumulating evidence from epidemiological studies shows that vaccines in some situations can affect all-cause mortality and morbidity in ways that are not explained by the prevention of the vaccine-targeted disease. Live attenuated vaccines have sometimes been associated with decreases in mortality and morbidity that are greater than anticipated. In contrast, some non-live vaccines have in certain contexts been associated with increases in all-cause mortality and morbidity. The non-specific effects are often greater for female than male individuals. Immunological studies have provided several mechanisms that explain how vaccines might modulate the immune response to unrelated pathogens, such as through trained innate immunity, emergency granulopoiesis, and heterologous T-cell immunity. These insights suggest that the framework for the testing, approving, and regulating vaccines needs to be updated to accommodate non-specific effects. Currently, non-specific effects are not routinely captured in phase I-III clinical trials or in the post-licensure safety surveillance. For instance, an infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae occurring months after a diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccination would not be considered an effect of the vaccination, although evidence indicates it might well be for female individuals. Here, as a starting point for discussion, we propose a new framework that considers the non-specific effects of vaccines in both phase III trials and post-licensure.
AB - The current framework for testing and regulating vaccines was established before the realization that vaccines, in addition to their effect against the vaccine-specific disease, may also have "non-specific effects" affecting the risk of unrelated diseases. Accumulating evidence from epidemiological studies shows that vaccines in some situations can affect all-cause mortality and morbidity in ways that are not explained by the prevention of the vaccine-targeted disease. Live attenuated vaccines have sometimes been associated with decreases in mortality and morbidity that are greater than anticipated. In contrast, some non-live vaccines have in certain contexts been associated with increases in all-cause mortality and morbidity. The non-specific effects are often greater for female than male individuals. Immunological studies have provided several mechanisms that explain how vaccines might modulate the immune response to unrelated pathogens, such as through trained innate immunity, emergency granulopoiesis, and heterologous T-cell immunity. These insights suggest that the framework for the testing, approving, and regulating vaccines needs to be updated to accommodate non-specific effects. Currently, non-specific effects are not routinely captured in phase I-III clinical trials or in the post-licensure safety surveillance. For instance, an infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae occurring months after a diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccination would not be considered an effect of the vaccination, although evidence indicates it might well be for female individuals. Here, as a starting point for discussion, we propose a new framework that considers the non-specific effects of vaccines in both phase III trials and post-licensure.
KW - DIPHTHERIA-TETANUS-PERTUSSIS
KW - TITER MEASLES IMMUNIZATION
KW - BCG VACCINATION
KW - MALE MORTALITY
KW - GUINEA-BISSAU
KW - SEX
KW - FEMALE
KW - TRIALS
KW - INFANTS
KW - POLIO
U2 - 10.1007/s40264-023-01295-3
DO - 10.1007/s40264-023-01295-3
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37074598
VL - 46
SP - 439
EP - 448
JO - Drug Safety
JF - Drug Safety
SN - 0114-5916
ER -
ID: 347530995