European legislation impedes critical care research and fails to protect patients' rights

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

European legislation impedes critical care research and fails to protect patients' rights. / Berg, Ronan M G; Møller, Kirsten; Rossel, Peter J Hancke.

I: Critical Care, Bind 15, Nr. 2, 2011, s. 148.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Berg, RMG, Møller, K & Rossel, PJH 2011, 'European legislation impedes critical care research and fails to protect patients' rights', Critical Care, bind 15, nr. 2, s. 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10113

APA

Berg, R. M. G., Møller, K., & Rossel, P. J. H. (2011). European legislation impedes critical care research and fails to protect patients' rights. Critical Care, 15(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10113

Vancouver

Berg RMG, Møller K, Rossel PJH. European legislation impedes critical care research and fails to protect patients' rights. Critical Care. 2011;15(2):148. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10113

Author

Berg, Ronan M G ; Møller, Kirsten ; Rossel, Peter J Hancke. / European legislation impedes critical care research and fails to protect patients' rights. I: Critical Care. 2011 ; Bind 15, Nr. 2. s. 148.

Bibtex

@article{eff727944d76496abafe0034a9c480af,
title = "European legislation impedes critical care research and fails to protect patients' rights",
abstract = "The European Clinical Trials Directive requires an informed consent from the patient or a proxy in drug trials. Although informed consent is a valuable tool to protect patients' rights in clinical trials, this requirement largely impedes research in critical care settings, and if pursued in this context, it does not provide the patient with adequate protection. Instead of insisting on informed consent, we suggest that the focus should be shifted towards two other ethically relevant elements in human experimentation: risk assessment and selection of research subjects. When reviewing protocols in which a waiver of consent is deemed necessary, the Ethical Review Board should ensure that non-therapeutic risks are minimal, that the research is specifically designed to benefit critically ill patients, and that it cannot be conducted under circumstances where an informed consent can be obtained. If the European Directive is changed accordingly, this permits clinical trials in critical care settings, while adequate protection from risky non-therapeutic procedures is ensured and exploitation of the patient as an easily accessible research subject is prevented.",
keywords = "Biomedical Research/ethics, Critical Care/ethics, Humans, Intensive Care Units/ethics, Risk Assessment",
author = "Berg, {Ronan M G} and Kirsten M{\o}ller and Rossel, {Peter J Hancke}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1186/cc10113",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "148",
journal = "Critical Care",
issn = "1364-8535",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - European legislation impedes critical care research and fails to protect patients' rights

AU - Berg, Ronan M G

AU - Møller, Kirsten

AU - Rossel, Peter J Hancke

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The European Clinical Trials Directive requires an informed consent from the patient or a proxy in drug trials. Although informed consent is a valuable tool to protect patients' rights in clinical trials, this requirement largely impedes research in critical care settings, and if pursued in this context, it does not provide the patient with adequate protection. Instead of insisting on informed consent, we suggest that the focus should be shifted towards two other ethically relevant elements in human experimentation: risk assessment and selection of research subjects. When reviewing protocols in which a waiver of consent is deemed necessary, the Ethical Review Board should ensure that non-therapeutic risks are minimal, that the research is specifically designed to benefit critically ill patients, and that it cannot be conducted under circumstances where an informed consent can be obtained. If the European Directive is changed accordingly, this permits clinical trials in critical care settings, while adequate protection from risky non-therapeutic procedures is ensured and exploitation of the patient as an easily accessible research subject is prevented.

AB - The European Clinical Trials Directive requires an informed consent from the patient or a proxy in drug trials. Although informed consent is a valuable tool to protect patients' rights in clinical trials, this requirement largely impedes research in critical care settings, and if pursued in this context, it does not provide the patient with adequate protection. Instead of insisting on informed consent, we suggest that the focus should be shifted towards two other ethically relevant elements in human experimentation: risk assessment and selection of research subjects. When reviewing protocols in which a waiver of consent is deemed necessary, the Ethical Review Board should ensure that non-therapeutic risks are minimal, that the research is specifically designed to benefit critically ill patients, and that it cannot be conducted under circumstances where an informed consent can be obtained. If the European Directive is changed accordingly, this permits clinical trials in critical care settings, while adequate protection from risky non-therapeutic procedures is ensured and exploitation of the patient as an easily accessible research subject is prevented.

KW - Biomedical Research/ethics

KW - Critical Care/ethics

KW - Humans

KW - Intensive Care Units/ethics

KW - Risk Assessment

U2 - 10.1186/cc10113

DO - 10.1186/cc10113

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 21542880

VL - 15

SP - 148

JO - Critical Care

JF - Critical Care

SN - 1364-8535

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 236993795