Delphi consensus statement on intrapartum fetal monitoring in low-resource settings

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

Natasha Housseine, Marieke C. Punt, Joyce L. Browne, Janneke van ‘t Hooft, Nanna Maaløe, Tarek Meguid, Gerhard B. Theron, Arie Franx, Diederick E. Grobbee, Gerard H.A. Visser, Marcus J. Rijken

Objective: To determine acceptable and achievable strategies of intrapartum fetal monitoring in busy low-resource settings. Methods: Three rounds of online Delphi surveys were conducted between January 1 and October 31, 2017. International experts with experience in low-resource settings scored the importance of intrapartum fetal monitoring methods. Results: 71 experts completed all three rounds (28 midwives, 43 obstetricians). Consensus was reached on (1) need for an admission test, (2) handheld Doppler for intrapartum fetal monitoring, (3) intermittent auscultation (IA) every 30 minutes for low-risk pregnancies during the first stage of labor and after every contraction for high-risk pregnancies in the second stage, (4) contraction monitoring hourly for low-risk pregnancies in the first stage, and (5) adjunctive tests. Consensus was not reached on frequency of IA or contraction monitoring for high-risk women in the first stage or low-risk women in the second stage of labor. Conclusion: There is a gap between international recommendations and what is physically possible in many labor wards in low-resource settings. Research on how to effectively implement the consensus on fetal assessment at admission and use of handheld Doppler during labor and delivery is crucial to support staff in achieving the best possible care in low-resource settings.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Vol/bind146
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)8-16
Antal sider9
ISSN0020-7292
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2019

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk


Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 218080785