Analytical perspectives on performance­based  management: an outline of theoretical assumptions in the  existing literature

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Standard

Analytical perspectives on performance­based  management: an outline of theoretical assumptions in the  existing literature. / Wadmann, Sarah; Johansen, Sarah; Møldrup, Ane Lind; Birk, Hans Okkels; Hoeyer, Klaus.

I: Health Economics, Policy and Law, Bind 8, Nr. 4, 14.03.2013, s. 511-527.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Wadmann, S, Johansen, S, Møldrup, AL, Birk, HO & Hoeyer, K 2013, 'Analytical perspectives on performance­based  management: an outline of theoretical assumptions in the  existing literature', Health Economics, Policy and Law, bind 8, nr. 4, s. 511-527. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413311300011X

APA

Wadmann, S., Johansen, S., Møldrup, A. L., Birk, H. O., & Hoeyer, K. (2013). Analytical perspectives on performance­based  management: an outline of theoretical assumptions in the  existing literature. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 8(4), 511-527. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413311300011X

Vancouver

Wadmann S, Johansen S, Møldrup AL, Birk HO, Hoeyer K. Analytical perspectives on performance­based  management: an outline of theoretical assumptions in the  existing literature. Health Economics, Policy and Law. 2013 mar. 14;8(4):511-527. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413311300011X

Author

Wadmann, Sarah ; Johansen, Sarah ; Møldrup, Ane Lind ; Birk, Hans Okkels ; Hoeyer, Klaus. / Analytical perspectives on performance­based  management: an outline of theoretical assumptions in the  existing literature. I: Health Economics, Policy and Law. 2013 ; Bind 8, Nr. 4. s. 511-527.

Bibtex

@article{e84990f04ba04d05b3bad5ed3d1c4d43,
title = "Analytical perspectives on performance­based  management: an outline of theoretical assumptions in the  existing literature",
abstract = "Performance-based management (PBM) has become a dominant formof governance in health care and there is a need for careful assessment of itsfunction and effects. This article contains a cross-disciplinary literature synthesisof current studies of PBM. Literature was retrieved by database searches andcategorized according to analytical differences and similarities concerning(1) purpose and (2) governance mechanism of PBM. The literature couldbe grouped into three approaches to the study of PBM, which we termed:the {\textquoteleft}functionalist{\textquoteright}, the {\textquoteleft}interpretive{\textquoteright} and the {\textquoteleft}post-modern{\textquoteright} perspective. In thefunctionalist perspective, PBM is perceived as a management tool aimed atimproving health care services by means of market-based mechanisms. In theinterpretive perspective, the adoption of PBM is understood as consequenceof institutional and individual agents striving for public legitimacy. In thepost-modern perspective, PBM is analysed as a form of governance, which hasbecome so ingrained in Western culture that health care professionals internalizeand understand their own behaviour and goals according to the values expressedin these governance systems. The recognition of differences in analyticalperspectives allows appreciation of otherwise implicit assumptions and potentialimplications of PBM. Re¿ections on such differences are important to ensurevigilant appropriation of shifting management tools in health quality governance",
keywords = "Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, performance-based management, Quality assessment, hospital management, public reporting of quality data, literature synthesis, cross-disciplinary research",
author = "Sarah Wadmann and Sarah Johansen and M{\o}ldrup, {Ane Lind} and Birk, {Hans Okkels} and Klaus Hoeyer",
year = "2013",
month = mar,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1017/S174413311300011X",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "511--527",
journal = "Health Economics, Policy and Law",
issn = "1744-1331",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analytical perspectives on performance­based  management: an outline of theoretical assumptions in the  existing literature

AU - Wadmann, Sarah

AU - Johansen, Sarah

AU - Møldrup, Ane Lind

AU - Birk, Hans Okkels

AU - Hoeyer, Klaus

PY - 2013/3/14

Y1 - 2013/3/14

N2 - Performance-based management (PBM) has become a dominant formof governance in health care and there is a need for careful assessment of itsfunction and effects. This article contains a cross-disciplinary literature synthesisof current studies of PBM. Literature was retrieved by database searches andcategorized according to analytical differences and similarities concerning(1) purpose and (2) governance mechanism of PBM. The literature couldbe grouped into three approaches to the study of PBM, which we termed:the ‘functionalist’, the ‘interpretive’ and the ‘post-modern’ perspective. In thefunctionalist perspective, PBM is perceived as a management tool aimed atimproving health care services by means of market-based mechanisms. In theinterpretive perspective, the adoption of PBM is understood as consequenceof institutional and individual agents striving for public legitimacy. In thepost-modern perspective, PBM is analysed as a form of governance, which hasbecome so ingrained in Western culture that health care professionals internalizeand understand their own behaviour and goals according to the values expressedin these governance systems. The recognition of differences in analyticalperspectives allows appreciation of otherwise implicit assumptions and potentialimplications of PBM. Re¿ections on such differences are important to ensurevigilant appropriation of shifting management tools in health quality governance

AB - Performance-based management (PBM) has become a dominant formof governance in health care and there is a need for careful assessment of itsfunction and effects. This article contains a cross-disciplinary literature synthesisof current studies of PBM. Literature was retrieved by database searches andcategorized according to analytical differences and similarities concerning(1) purpose and (2) governance mechanism of PBM. The literature couldbe grouped into three approaches to the study of PBM, which we termed:the ‘functionalist’, the ‘interpretive’ and the ‘post-modern’ perspective. In thefunctionalist perspective, PBM is perceived as a management tool aimed atimproving health care services by means of market-based mechanisms. In theinterpretive perspective, the adoption of PBM is understood as consequenceof institutional and individual agents striving for public legitimacy. In thepost-modern perspective, PBM is analysed as a form of governance, which hasbecome so ingrained in Western culture that health care professionals internalizeand understand their own behaviour and goals according to the values expressedin these governance systems. The recognition of differences in analyticalperspectives allows appreciation of otherwise implicit assumptions and potentialimplications of PBM. Re¿ections on such differences are important to ensurevigilant appropriation of shifting management tools in health quality governance

KW - Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences

KW - performance-based management

KW - Quality assessment

KW - hospital management

KW - public reporting of quality data

KW - literature synthesis

KW - cross-disciplinary research

U2 - 10.1017/S174413311300011X

DO - 10.1017/S174413311300011X

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 23506797

VL - 8

SP - 511

EP - 527

JO - Health Economics, Policy and Law

JF - Health Economics, Policy and Law

SN - 1744-1331

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 45029763